Literature DB >> 30099626

Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines.

E M van der Schans1, T J C Paulides2, N A Wijffels3, E C J Consten2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse-both external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse-is a disabling condition. In view of the overwhelming number of surgical procedures described for the treatment of rectal prolapse, a comprehensive update concerning the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for this condition is required to draw recommendations for clinical practice. This initiative was commissioned by the Dutch Association for Surgery (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Heelkunde) as a multidisciplinary collaboration.
METHODS: Nine questions outlining the diagnostic approach, conservative and surgical management of rectal prolapse were selected. A systematic literature search for evidence was then conducted in the Medline and Embase databases.
RESULTS: Recommendations included diagnostic approach, methods to assess complaints of fecal incontinence and/or obstructive defecation and treatment options, both conservative and surgical. A level of evidence was assigned to each statement following the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines for clinical practice are useful in the diagnosis and treatment of rectal prolapse. There are many statements requiring a higher level of evidence due to a lack of studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Practice guideline; Rectal prolapse; Rectopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30099626     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1830-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  58 in total

Review 1.  AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Michelle E Kho; George P Browman; Jako S Burgers; Francoise Cluzeau; Gene Feder; Béatrice Fervers; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Steven E Hanna; Peter Littlejohns; Julie Makarski; Louise Zitzelsberger
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound.

Authors:  A B Steensma; D M J Oom; C W Burger; W R Schouten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Evacuation proctography in normal volunteers.

Authors:  M G Freimanis; A Wald; B Caruana; D H Bauman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Transperineal ultrasound compared to evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions.

Authors:  M Weemhoff; K B Kluivers; B Govaert; J L H Evers; A G H Kessels; C G Baeten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Responsiveness and interpretability of incontinence severity scores and FIQL in patients with fecal incontinence: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E M J Bols; H J M Hendriks; L C M Berghmans; C G M I Baeten; R A de Bie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.

Authors:  J Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; T Rautio; K Klintrup; H Takala; M Vierimaa; P Ohtonen; J Mäkelä
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  [Indications, technique and results of the STARR procedure].

Authors:  O Schwandner; P Hillemanns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; U Mikkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults.

Authors:  Samson Tou; Steven R Brown; Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24

10.  Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

Authors:  Dominique E N M de Hoog; Jeroen Heemskerk; Fred H M Nieman; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G M I Baeten; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

2.  Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; T Rautio; A Ohinmaa; S Koivurova; P Ohtonen; H Sintonen; J Mäkelä
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse-the preferred procedure for the unfit elderly patient? 10 years experience from a UK tertiary centre.

Authors:  M Alwahid; S R Knight; H Wadhawan; K L Campbell; D Ziyaie; S M P Koch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Absent or impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex as a diagnostic factor for high-grade (grade III-V) rectal prolapse: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Byung-Soo Park; Sung Hwan Cho; Gyung Mo Son; Hyun Sung Kim; Yong-Hoon Cho; Dae Gon Ryu; Su Jin Kim; Su Bum Park; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Tae Un Kim; Dong Soo Suh; Myunghee Yoon; Hong Jae Jo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; M A Boom; M El Moumni; P M Verheijen; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Changing Trend of Rectal Prolapse Surgery in the Era of the Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Suk-Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2019-12-15

7.  Efficacy and safety of Buzhong Yiqi decoction combined with surgery for rectal prolapse: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Yanpeng Xie; Yihua Fan; Chen Yang; Renhong Wan; Xiaoen Cheng; Xiangdong Yang; Yuanzhang Hu; Changyou Deng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Longer prolapsed rectum length increases recurrence risk after Delorme's procedure.

Authors:  Taro Tanabe; Emi Yamaguchi; Takuya Nakada; Risa Nishio; Kinya Okamoto; Tetsuo Yamana
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-07-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.