Literature DB >> 22806487

Responsiveness and interpretability of incontinence severity scores and FIQL in patients with fecal incontinence: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

E M J Bols1, H J M Hendriks, L C M Berghmans, C G M I Baeten, R A de Bie.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to assess the responsiveness and interpretability of the Vaizey score, Wexner score, and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) for use in the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence (FI).
METHODS: Eighty patients with FI with a mean age of 59.3 (SD ± 11.9) were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. The patient-reported outcomes were tested for internal and external responsiveness, longitudinal construct validity, and interpretability.
RESULTS: All total scores proved to have both adequate to excellent responsiveness and longitudinal construct validity, and changes were in agreement with subjective improvement. Due to variability in minimally important change estimates (Vaizey score -5 to -3, Wexner score -3 to -2, FIQL 1.1 to 1.2), they should be used as indicators. All patient-reported outcomes showed psychometric or practical limitations.
CONCLUSIONS: The instruments available to date to evaluate severity and quality of life in FI do not yet attain the highest levels of psychometric soundness. As the focus of patients may differ from that of physicians, it is recommended that several measures should be included for evaluation. So far, there are suggestions that the Wexner score is most suitable for severity assessment and the FIQL for evaluating quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806487     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1886-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  31 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation.

Authors:  K Salter; J W Jutai; R Teasell; N C Foley; J Bitensky; M Bayley
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Selecting an outcome measure for evaluating treatment in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marije Deutekom; Maaike P Terra; Annette C Dobben; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Jaap Stoker; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Fecal incontinence in primary care: prevalence, diagnosis, and health care utilization.

Authors:  Gena C Dunivan; Steve Heymen; Olafur S Palsson; Michael von Korff; Marsha J Turner; Jennifer L Melville; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A new condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with anal incontinence.

Authors:  G J Bug; E S Kiff; G Hosker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 8.  Questionnaires to assess urinary and anal incontinence: review and recommendations.

Authors:  K N L Avery; J L H R Bosch; M Gotoh; M Naughton; S Jackson; S C Radley; L Valiquette; J Batista; J L Donovan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Todd H Rockwood
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Berend Terluin; Dirk L Knol; Leo D Roorda; Lidwine B Mokkink; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Erik J M Hendriks; Lex M Bouter; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  19 in total

1.  Strong agreement between interview-obtained and self-administered Wexner and St. Mark's scores using a single questionnaire.

Authors:  Stig Norderval; Mona Birgitte Rydningen; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Arvid Stordahl; Hege Hølmo Johannessen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

3.  Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; T J C Paulides; N A Wijffels; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence.

Authors:  C E Koh; M J Solomon
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Obstetric anal sphincter injury: a follow-up questionnaire study on longer-term outcomes.

Authors:  Simone Cornelisse; Linda Petra Arendsen; Sander Martijn Job van Kuijk; Kirsten Birgit Kluivers; Jeroen van Dillen; Mirjam Weemhoff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Validation of a new scoring system: Rapid assessment faecal incontinence score.

Authors:  Fernando de la Portilla; Arantxa Calero-Lillo; Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; Maria L Reyes; Manuela Segovia-González; María Victoria Maestre; Ana M García-Cabrera
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

Review 7.  Dutch evidence statement for pelvic physical therapy in patients with anal incontinence.

Authors:  L C M Berghmans; J A M Groot; I C van Heeswijk-Faase; E M J Bols
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) using item response theory reveals limitations and suggests revisions.

Authors:  Alexander C Peterson; Jason M Sutherland; Guiping Liu; R Trafford Crump; Ahmer A Karimuddin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome after a low anterior resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilhelmina S Visser; Wouter W Te Riele; Djamila Boerma; Bert van Ramshorst; Henderik L van Westreenen
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-23

10.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.