Literature DB >> 19438878

Assessment of posterior compartment prolapse: a comparison of evacuation proctography and 3D transperineal ultrasound.

A B Steensma1, D M J Oom, C W Burger, W R Schouten.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evacuation proctography (EP) is considered to be the gold standard investigation for the diagnosis of posterior compartment prolapse. 3D transperineal ultrasound (3DTPUS) imaging of the pelvic floor is a noninvasive investigation for detection of pelvic floor abnormalities. This study compared EP with 3DTPUS in diagnosing posterior compartment prolapse.
METHOD: In a prospective observational study, patients with symptoms related to posterior compartment prolapse participated in a standardized interview, clinical examination, 3DTPUS and EP. Both examinations were analysed separately by two experienced investigators, blinded against the clinical data and against the results of the other imaging technique. After the examinations, all patients were asked to fill out a standardized questionnaire concerning their subjective experience.
RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2007, 75 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (range 22-83). The Cohen's Kappa Index for enterocole was 0.65 (good) and for rectocele it was 0.55 (moderate). The level of correlation for intussusception was fair (kappa = 0.21).
CONCLUSION: This study showed moderate to good agreement between 3DTPUS and EP for detecting enterocele and rectocele.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19438878     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01936.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  20 in total

1.  Digitation associated with defecation: what does it mean in urogynaecological patients?

Authors:  Cao Hai-Ying; Rodrigo Guzmán Rojas; Jessica Caudwell Hall; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what's in it for the surgeon?

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Accuracy of integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound compared to defaecatory MRI in females with pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction.

Authors:  Alison J Hainsworth; Sophie A Pilkington; Catherine Grierson; Elizabeth Rutherford; Alexis M P Schizas; Karen P Nugent; Andrew B Williams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Functional Disorders of Constipation: Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction and Increased Perineal Descent.

Authors:  Isaac Payne; Leander M Grimm
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

5.  Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; T J C Paulides; N A Wijffels; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Transperineal ultrasound compared to evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions.

Authors:  M Weemhoff; K B Kluivers; B Govaert; J L H Evers; A G H Kessels; C G Baeten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Marc Beer-Gabel; Dan Carter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Digital rectal examination in the evaluation of rectovaginal septal defects.

Authors:  Suneetha Rachaneni; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Association between vaginal parity and rectocele.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz; Mariángeles Gómez; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Caroline S Wanderley Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Female pelvic floor dysfunction--an imaging perspective.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.