Literature DB >> 30091068

Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.

Hang Feng1, Haoxi Li1, Zhaoyu Ba1, Zhaoxiong Chen1, Xinhua Li1, Desheng Wu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate and comprehensive data on cervical endplates is essential for developing and improving cervical devices. However, current literature on vertebral disc geometry is scarce or not suitable. The aim of this study was to obtain quantitative parameters of cervical endplates and provide morphometric references for designing cervical devices.
METHODS: In this study, 19 human cervical spine cadaveric specimens were considered. Employing a reverse engineering system, the surface information of each endplate was recorded in digital cloud and then 3D reconstructed. A measurement protocol that included three sagittal and three frontal surface curves was developed. The information of surface curves and endplate concavity were obtained and analyzed. The parametric equations of endplate surfaces were deduced based on coordinates of landmarks, and the reliability was verified.
RESULTS: The cervical endplate surface had a trend that to be transversely elongated gradually. The concavity depths of inferior endplates (1.88 to 2.13 mm) were significantly larger than those of superior endplates (0.62 to 0.84 mm). The most-concave points in inferior endplates were concentrated in the central portion, while always located in post-median region in superior endplates.
CONCLUSION: These results will give appropriate guidelines to design cervical prostheses without sacrificing valuable bone stock. The parametric equations applied for generating surface profile of cervical endplates may provide great convenience for subsequent studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Cervical prostheses; Cervical vertebra endplates; Morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30091068     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4053-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans.

Authors:  S H Tan; E C Teo; H C Chua
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Carrie M Ballester; Frank Hammond; Ehren T Carine; Richard A Balderston; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Impact of screw location and endplate preparation on pullout strength for anterior plates and integrated fixation cages.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Vivek Palepu; Jonathan H Peck; Melvin D Helgeson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; J Duranceau; V Goel; T Oxland; K Takata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Lin; Heesuk Kang; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Scott J Hollister; Frank La Marca
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Reducing subsidence risk by using rapid manufactured patient-specific intervertebral disc implants.

Authors:  Neal de Beer; Cornie Scheffer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction.

Authors:  Priyan R Landham; Angus S Don; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate.

Authors:  M J Silva; C Wang; T M Keaveny; W C Hayes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Clinical magnification error in lateral spinal digital radiographs.

Authors:  Bheeshma Ravi; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michaela Gstoettner; Gstoettner Michaela; Denise Heider; Heider Denise; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Michael Bach; Bach Christian Michael
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cervical endplate bone density distribution measured by CT osteoabsorptiometry and direct comparison with mechanical properties of the endplate.

Authors:  Takeshi Hara; Yukoh Ohara; Eiji Abe; Kaosu Takami; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Hajime Arai; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliability and reproducibility of measurements in para-sagittal planes on sub-axial cervical vertebral bodies: a morphometric study of endplates in three-dimensional models.

Authors:  Long Wang; Hao T Luo; Wei Lu; Xing Bo Cai; Chen Yu; Sheng Lu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.