Literature DB >> 34268667

Cervical endplate bone density distribution measured by CT osteoabsorptiometry and direct comparison with mechanical properties of the endplate.

Takeshi Hara1, Yukoh Ohara2, Eiji Abe2, Kaosu Takami3, Alejandro A Espinoza Orías3, Hajime Arai2, Nozomu Inoue3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intervertebral device subsidence is one of the complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The biomechanical properties of vertebral bony endplate may be related to device subsidence. The aim of this study is to measure the cervical endplate bone density distribution using a novel 3D measurement method.
METHODS: Eight human cadaver cervical spines were obtained and levels C3-C7 were dissected and CT scanned. Three-dimensional (3D) CT model was created with the same 3D coordinates of the original DICOM dataset. The regional strength and stiffness of the endplate were determined by indentation testing. The indentation points were recorded by a photograph and the location of the indentation points was projected to the 3D CT model. Three-dimensional coordinates of the indentation point was obtained in the 3D space determined by the DICOM dataset. The area underneath the indentation point was calculated by a trilinear interpolation method directly. Data in HU and correlations with the indentation strength and stiffness were analysed.
RESULTS: A positive correlation was found between HU and strength (r = 0.52) and between HU and stiffness (r = 0.41). Overall, mechanical strength and stiffness and HU in the superior endplate of the caudal vertebra were lower than those in the inferior endplate of the cranial vertebra in the same intervertebral disc.
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical properties and the HU were found to be significantly correlated, which employed a novel 3D HU measurement method, thus demonstrating potential to predict cervical endplate failure risk in a clinical setting.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Bone mineral density; Cervical endplate; Device subsidence; Indentation test

Year:  2021        PMID: 34268667     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06920-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sadayoshi Watanabe; Nozomu Inoue; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Yoshitaka Hirano; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Shintaro Nishida; Yuichi Hirose; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT measured subchondral bone density.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Ordway; Yen-Mou Lu; Xingkai Zhang; Chin-Chang Cheng; Huang Fang; Amir H Fayyazi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Revision rates and complication incidence in single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures: an administrative database study.

Authors:  Anand Veeravagu; Tyler Cole; Bowen Jiang; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 4.  Vertebral subchondral bone.

Authors:  C Nguyen; S Poiraudeau; F Rannou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Structural property distribution of the cervical endplate and the correlation with CT measured subchondral bone density.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Ordway; Yen-Mou Lu; Xingkai Zhang; Chin-Chang Cheng; Huang Fang; Amir H Fayyazi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Factors Influencing Interbody Cage Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Igarashi; Masahiro Hoshino; Keita Omori; Hiromi Matsuzaki; Yasuhiro Nemoto; Takashi Tsuruta; Koji Yamasaki
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: Long-term Changes in Sagittal Alignment and Their Clinical Implications After Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence: A Prospective Study With Standalone Lordotic Tantalum Cages.

Authors:  Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Julián A Morales-Valencia; Javier Moreno-Pérez; Juan Marfil-Pérez; Elena Díaz-Dominguez; Angel R Piñera; Luis Alvarez
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  Cage deviation in the subaxial cervical spine in relation to implant position in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Klaus Christian Mende; Sven Oliver Eicker; Friedrich Weber
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Subsidence after single-level anterior cervical fusion with a stand-alone cage.

Authors:  Jae-Young Park; Ki-Young Choi; Bong Ju Moon; Hyuk Hur; Jae-Won Jang; Jung-Kil Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.961

10.  The distribution of mineral density in the cervical vertebral endplates.

Authors:  Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Stefan Weißer; Ulrich Linsenmeier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Simultaneous decompression of all stenotic regions versus decompression of only the most symptomatic region in patients with tandem spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samarth Mittal; Kaustubh Ahuja; P V Sudhakar; Syed Ifthekar; Gagandeep Yadav; Bhaskar Sarkar; Pankaj Kandwal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Low cervical vertebral CT value increased early subsidence of titanium mesh cage after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wang; Jun Mei; Xiaoning Feng; Chen Deng; Xuefeng Tian; Junqiao Lv; Lin Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.