Literature DB >> 19564765

Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.

Chia-Ying Lin1, Heesuk Kang, Jeffrey P Rouleau, Scott J Hollister, Frank La Marca.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Segmental motion and bone-implant interface stresses were analyzed at C5-C6 levels with Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses using an image-based finite element modeling technique.
OBJECTIVE: To predict stress patterns at the interface between prosthesis and lower vertebral end plate to better understand the underlying mechanisms of subsidence and how the load transfer pattern of each disc design affects segmental motion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Subsidence is one of the most commonly reported device-related complications in intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Although clinical outcomes have been reported regarding many types of cervical prostheses, few reports have analyzed the effects of stress from cervical artificial discs to the vertebral end plate.
METHODS: Three-dimensional voxel finite elements were built for C5-C6 spine unit based on computed tomography images acquired from a patient with indication for cervical disc arthroplasty. Models of facet joints and uncovertebral joints were added and artificial disc designs were placed in the intervertebral disc space. Static analyses were conducted under normal physiologic loads in flexion, extension, and lateral bending with precompression.
RESULTS: Bryan disc recovered highest range of motion (4.75 degrees ) due to the high elastic nucleus, and therefore imposed the lowest stresses superior to C6. The ProDisc-C and Prestige LP discs caused high stress concentrations around their central fins or teeth, and may initiate bone absorption. Analysis of Prestige LP disc may indicate possible subsidence posteriorly caused by the rear-positioned metal-to-metal joint.
CONCLUSION: Rigidity of the cores ("nuclei") in Prestige LP and ProDisc-C prostheses guarantee initial maintenance of disc height, but high contact stress takes place at the bone-end plate interface if they are improperly placed or undersized. Anchorage designs add an additional factor that may increase propensity of subsidence, indicated by the high contact stress occurring at the end plate flanges of Prestige LP, and at midline keel fixation on the end plate of ProDisc-C. Although Bryan disc differs in these 2 concerns, it also creates much larger displacement during motion with more variation in disc height that may theoretically increase the load sharing of facet and/or uncovertebral joints compared to more rigid artificial discs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19564765     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Morphological studies of cartilage endplates in subaxial cervical region.

Authors:  Songchuan Zhao; Dingjun Hao; Yonghong Jiang; Dageng Huang; Chaoyuan Ge; Hang Feng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 3.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.

Authors:  Hang Feng; Haoxi Li; Zhaoyu Ba; Zhaoxiong Chen; Xinhua Li; Desheng Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Sebastian Hartmann; Michaela Gstöttner; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Gabl; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Decompression for cervical disc herniation using the full-endoscopic anterior technique - German version].

Authors:  S Oezdemir; M Komp; P Hahn; S Ruetten
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Nano-Scale Surface Modifications to Advance Current Treatment Options for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD).

Authors:  Anne Yau; Ian Sands; Yupeng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Res Ther       Date:  2019-10-06

8.  A comparison of the shock-absorbing properties of cervical disc prosthesis bearing materials.

Authors:  Michael C Dahl; Stephen Jacobsen; Newton Metcalf; Rick Sasso; Randal P Ching
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-06-01

9.  Footprint mismatch of cervical disc prostheses with Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions.

Authors:  Liang Dong; Ming-Sheng Tan; Qin-Hua Yan; Ping Yi; Feng Yang; Xiang-Sheng Tang; Qing-Ying Hao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Prosthesis Based on the Physiological Curvature of Endplate for Cervical Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Yu; Ding-Jun Hao; Da-Geng Huang; Li-Xiong Qian; Hang Feng; Hou-Kun Li; Song-Chuan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.