Douglas H Sheafor1, Mark D Kovacs1, Philip Burchett1, Melissa M Picard1, Brenton Davis1, Andrew D Hardie2. 1. Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, MSC 323, 210 CSB, Charleston, SC, 29425-3230, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, MSC 323, 210 CSB, Charleston, SC, 29425-3230, USA. andrewdhardie@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess quantitative and qualitative effects of kVp on oral contrast density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three readers retrospectively reviewed 100 CT scans performed at a range of high- and low-energy settings, independently determining their preferred window and level settings for evaluation of the oral-contrast-opacified bowel. Contrast density was also assessed quantitatively in the stomach, jejunum, and ileum. Subsequently, a range of oral contrast dilutions were imaged at varying kVp's in a commercially available CIRS tissue equivalent phantom model. RESULTS: In the retrospective patient study, mean oral contrast density increased significantly in the ileum compared to the jejunum (455.2 and 308.8 HU, respectively, p < 0.01). Similar findings were seen in patients regardless of patients' weight. Mean oral contrast density was higher on lower-energy scans, requiring more window/level adjustment. An oral contrast iodine concentration of 5.82-7.77 mg I/mL most closely approximated a target oral contrast density of 200 HU. CONCLUSIONS: Oral contrast density is strongly influenced by kVp, supporting use of more dilute oral contrast when using lower-kVp techniques.
PURPOSE: To assess quantitative and qualitative effects of kVp on oral contrast density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three readers retrospectively reviewed 100 CT scans performed at a range of high- and low-energy settings, independently determining their preferred window and level settings for evaluation of the oral-contrast-opacified bowel. Contrast density was also assessed quantitatively in the stomach, jejunum, and ileum. Subsequently, a range of oral contrast dilutions were imaged at varying kVp's in a commercially available CIRS tissue equivalent phantom model. RESULTS: In the retrospective patient study, mean oral contrast density increased significantly in the ileum compared to the jejunum (455.2 and 308.8 HU, respectively, p < 0.01). Similar findings were seen in patients regardless of patients' weight. Mean oral contrast density was higher on lower-energy scans, requiring more window/level adjustment. An oral contrast iodine concentration of 5.82-7.77 mg I/mL most closely approximated a target oral contrast density of 200 HU. CONCLUSIONS: Oral contrast density is strongly influenced by kVp, supporting use of more dilute oral contrast when using lower-kVp techniques.
Authors: Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Sebastian T Schindera; Samuel Richard; Richard S Youngblood; Terry T Yoshizumi; Ehsan Samei Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Francesca Iacobellis; Donatella Narese; Daniela Berritto; Antonio Brillantino; Marco Di Serafino; Susanna Guerrini; Roberta Grassi; Mariano Scaglione; Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Luigia Romano Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-30