Literature DB >> 19092097

Routine use of positive oral contrast material is not required for oncology patients undergoing follow-up multidetector CT.

Sreemathi Harieaswar1, Arumugam Rajesh, Yvette Griffin, Raman Tyagi, Bruno Morgan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective medical audit was to evaluate the effect of discontinuing routine administration of oral contrast material to oncology patients undergoing follow-up multidetector computed tomography (CT) on reader evaluation of study adequacy. Analysis of 100 patients' experience of CT shows that positive oral contrast material was their least pleasant experience (P < .0001). Abandoning the routine use of positive oral contrast material for follow-up scans in general oncology patients undergoing multidetector CT, with section reconstruction thickness of 2.5 mm, was audited for 447 patents and included 5-13-month follow-up. The patient satisfaction study and clinical audit were performed according to local institutional audit guidelines. Since this was a clinical audit project, ethical approval was not required under UK National Health Service research governance arrangements. No patient needed to be recalled, no related diagnostic error has been reported, and follow-up CT, available in 285 of 447 cases (64%), revealed no error on the audited scan. We conclude that the routine use of positive oral contrast material is unnecessary for follow-up multidetector CT for general oncology indications. (c) RSNA, 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19092097     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493080353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Administration of enteric contrast material before abdominal CT in children: current practices and controversies.

Authors:  Mohamed Mahmoud; John McAuliffe; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11

Review 2.  Use of positive oral contrast agents in abdominopelvic computed tomography for blunt abdominal injury: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Benjamin Haaland; Arul Earnest; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  An evaluation of the use of oral contrast media in abdominopelvic CT.

Authors:  Erica Lauren Buttigieg; Karen Borg Grima; Kelvin Cortis; Sandro Galea Soler; Francis Zarb
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Abdominal and pelvic CT: is positive enteric contrast still necessary? Results of a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  S Kammerer; A J Höink; J Wessling; H Heinzow; R Koch; C Schuelke; W Heindel; B Buerke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Utility of CT oral contrast administration in the emergency department of a quaternary oncology hospital: diagnostic implications, turnaround times, and assessment of ED physician ordering.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen; Katherine J Blair; Ott Le; Jia Sun; Wei Wei; Brinda Rao Korivi; Ajaykumar C Morani; Nicolaus A Wagner-Bartak
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  CT of Ovarian Cancer for Primary Treatment Planning: What the Surgeon Needs to Know-Radiology In Training.

Authors:  Maria Clara Fernandes; Ines Nikolovski; Kara Long Roche; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 29.146

7.  Impact of low-kVp scan technique on oral contrast density at abdominopelvic CT.

Authors:  Douglas H Sheafor; Mark D Kovacs; Philip Burchett; Melissa M Picard; Brenton Davis; Andrew D Hardie
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT.

Authors:  Till F Kaireit; Carolin Huisinga; Matti Peperhove; Frank Wacker; Kristina I Ringe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.