Literature DB >> 30073470

A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy.

Utsana Tonmukayakul1,2, Long Khanh-Dao Le3, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage3, Lidia Engel3, Jessica Bucholc3, Brendan Mulhern4, Rob Carter3, Cathrine Mihalopoulos3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Project aims include the following: (i) to identify reported utility values associated with CP in children aged ≤ 18 years; (ii) to explore utility value elicitation techniques in published studies; and (iii) to examine performance of the measures and/or elicitation approaches.
METHODS: Peer-reviewed studies published prior to March 2017 were identified from six electronic databases. Construct validity, convergent validity, responsiveness, and reliability of instruments were assessed.
RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Utility values of hypothetical general CP states obtained from a general population of parents ranged from 0.55 to 0.88 using time trade off (TTO) and 0.60-0.87 using standard gamble (SG) techniques. Utility values reported by clinicians of three hypothetical spastic quadriplegic CP states, using the Health Utility Index Mark 2 (HUI-2), ranged from 0.40 to 0.13. Other sources of utilities identified were based on both proxy and child ratings using Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) (values ranged from - 0.013 to 0.84 depending on the valuation source) and the Assessment of Quality of Life 4 Dimension instrument, with values ranging from 0.01 to 0.58. Construct validity of the HUI-3 varied from moderate to strong, whereas mixed results were found for convergent validity. Responsiveness and reliability were not reported.
CONCLUSION: There was substantial variation in reported utilities. Indirect techniques (i.e. via multi-attribute utility instruments) were more frequently used than direct techniques (e.g. TTO, SG). Further research is required to improve the robustness of utility valuation of health-related quality of life in children with CP for use in economic evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Cerebral palsy; Children; Quality of life; Quality-adjusted life years; Utility value; Utility weight

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30073470     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1955-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  49 in total

Review 1.  A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics.

Authors:  J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Exclusion Criteria in National Health State Valuation Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lidia Engel; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan; Mary M Doyle-Waters; David G T Whitehurst
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health-State Values for the Child Health Utility-9D Using Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling.

Authors:  Julie Ratcliffe; Elisabeth Huynh; Katherine Stevens; John Brazier; Michael Sawyer; Terry Flynn
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006.

Authors:  Peter Rosenbaum; Nigel Paneth; Alan Leviton; Murray Goldstein; Martin Bax; Diane Damiano; Bernard Dan; Bo Jacobsson
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl       Date:  2007-02

Review 6.  Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.

Authors:  Louise Longworth; Yaling Yang; Tracey Young; Brendan Mulhern; Mónica Hernández Alava; Clara Mukuria; Donna Rowen; Jonathan Tosh; Aki Tsuchiya; Pippa Evans; Anju Devianee Keetharuth; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Utsana Tonmukayakul; Long Khanh-Dao Le; Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage; Lidia Engel; Jessica Bucholc; Brendan Mulhern; Rob Carter; Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Cost-effectiveness of intrathecal baclofen therapy for the treatment of severe spasticity associated with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Gregory de Lissovoy; Louis S Matza; Hannah Green; Meghan Werner; Terence Edgar
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 10.  Is Meta-Analysis for Utility Values Appropriate Given the Potential Impact Different Elicitation Methods Have on Values?

Authors:  Tessa Peasgood; John Brazier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Vasiliki Katsi; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Panagiota Mitropoulou; Konstantinos Kontoangelos; Zoi Kollia; Chara Tzavara; Dimitrios Soulis; Konstantinos Toutouzas; Dimitrios Oikonomou; Alberto Aimo; Konstantinos Tsioufis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Utsana Tonmukayakul; Long Khanh-Dao Le; Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage; Lidia Engel; Jessica Bucholc; Brendan Mulhern; Rob Carter; Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Cerebral palsy in Canada, 2011-2031: results of a microsimulation modelling study of epidemiological and cost impacts.

Authors:  Nana Amankwah; Maryam Oskoui; Rochelle Garner; Christina Bancej; Douglas G Manuel; Ron Wall; Philippe Finès; Julie Bernier; Karen Tu; Kim Reimer
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of cochlear implantation on health-related quality of life in older adults, measured with the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3.

Authors:  Ellen Andries; Annick Gilles; Vedat Topsakal; Olivier Vanderveken; Paul Van de Heyning; Vincent Van Rompaey; Griet Mertens
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparison of the CHU-9D and the EQ-5D-Y instruments in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Ryan; Ellen McKay; Nana Anokye; Marika Noorkoiv; Nicola Theis; Grace Lavelle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A systematic review of health state utility values for thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Houten; Nigel Fleeman; Eleanor Kotas; Angela Boland; Tosin Lambe; Rui Duarte
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.