| Literature DB >> 30072656 |
Fengjie Li1, Dorte Janussen2, Christian Peifer3, Ignacio Pérez-Victoria4, Deniz Tasdemir5,6.
Abstract
The Antarctic deep-sea sponge Latrunculia (Latrunculia) biformis Kirkpatrick, 1908 (Class Demospongiae Sollas, Order Poecilosclerida Topsent, Latrunculiidae Topsent) was selected for chemical analyses due to its potent anticancer activity. Metabolomic analysis of its crude extract by HRMS/MS-based molecular networking showed the presence of several clusters of pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids, i.e., discorhabdin and epinardin-type brominated pyridopyrroloquinolines and tsitsikammamines, the non-brominated bis-pyrroloiminoquinones. Molecular networking approach combined with a bioactivity-guided isolation led to the targeted isolation of the known pyrroloiminoquinone tsitsikammamine A (1) and its new analog 16,17-dehydrotsitsikammamine A (2). The chemical structures of the compounds 1 and 2 were elucidated by spectroscopic analysis (one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) NMR, HR-ESIMS). Due to minute amounts, molecular modeling and docking was used to assess potential affinities to potential targets of the isolated compounds, including DNA intercalation, topoisomerase I-II, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase enzymes. Tsitsikammamines represent a small class of pyrroloiminoquinone alkaloids that have only previously been reported from the South African sponge genus Tsitsikamma Samaai & Kelly and an Australian species of the sponge genus Zyzzya de Laubenfels. This is the first report of tsitsikammamines from the genus Latrunculia du Bocage and the successful application of molecular networking in the identification of comprehensive chemical inventory of L.biformis followed by targeted isolation of new molecules. This study highlights the high productivity of secondary metabolites of Latrunculia sponges and may shed new light on their biosynthetic origin and chemotaxonomy.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctica; Latrunculia, molecular networking; deep-sea; marine sponge; molecular docking; tsitsikammamine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30072656 PMCID: PMC6117724 DOI: 10.3390/md16080268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Anticancer activity of Latrunculia biformis crude extract and fraction 3 that yielded tsitsikammamines. The IC50 values are in µg/mL. Positive control doxorubicine.
| Sample | A-375 | HCT-116 | A-549 | MB-231 | Hep G2 | HT-29 | HaCaT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | 2.5 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 3.0 |
| Fraction 3 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 6.5 |
| Positive control | 0.13 | 10.6 | 31.4 | 15.2 | 14.6 | 3.0 | - |
Figure 1Annotated molecular network of the L. biformis extract. Numbers within the nodes indicate parent ions, and edge thickness represents the cosine similarity between nodes. Green nodes represent discorhabdins and epinardins. Purple nodes represent tsitsikammamines. (A) Discorhabdin and epinardin cluster. (A1) Epinardin sub-cluster. (A2) Monobrominated discorhabdin subcluster. (A3) Dibrominated discorhabdin sub-cluster. (B) Tsitsikammamine cluster.
1H NMR data of compounds 1 (DMSO-d6 and CD3OD) and 2 (CD3OD) (600 MHz, δ in ppm).
| Position | 1 a | 1 b | 2 b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.71 d (8.5) | 6.87 d (8.4) | 7.36 d (8.5) | 7.50 d (8.5) | 7.84 d (8.4) |
| 2 | 6.70 d (8.5) | 7.37 d (8.4) | 6.86 d (8.5) | 6.85 d (8.5) | 6.85 d (8.4) |
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | 6.70 d (8.5) | 7.37 d (8.4) | 6.86 d (8.5) | 6.85 d (8.5) | 6.85 d (8.4) |
| 5 | 7.71 d (8.5) | 6.87 d (8.4) | 7.36 d (8.5) | 7.50 d (8.5) | 7.84 d (8.4) |
| 6 | |||||
| 7 | |||||
| 8 | 7.14 d (1.8) | 7.16 d (2.5) | 7.17 d (2.9) | 7.02 s | 7.22 s |
| NH-9 | 12.28 s | 13.28 br s | 13.32 s | ||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| NH-13 | 12.00 s | 13.01 br s | 13.04 s | ||
| 14 | 6.91 s | 7.10 d (1.8) | 7.12 d (2.6) | 6.91 s | 7.93 s |
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | 2.65 t (7.8) | 2.93 t (7.8) | 2.93 t (7.8) | 2.89 t (7.8) | 7.66 d (5.9) |
| 17 | 3.97 t (7.8) | 3.85 t (7.8) | 3.84 t (7.8) | 3.94 t (7.8) | 8.34 d (5.9) |
| 19 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 21 | |||||
| OH | 9.31 br s | 10.60 br s | 10.43 s | ||
a DMSO-d6; b CD3OD; c free base; d data from literature [30]; e TFA salt.
13C NMR data of compounds 1 (DMSO-d6) and 2 (CD3OD) (150 MHz, δ in ppm).
| Position | 1 a | 2 b,c | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 129.8, CH | 116.2, CH | 129.1, CH | 129.8, CH |
| 2 | 114.4, CH | 128.9, CH | 116.4, CH | 114.4, CH |
| 3 | 156.1, C | 157.6, C | 157.7, C | 156.1, C |
| 4 | 114.4, CH | 128.9, CH | 116.4, CH | 114.4, CH |
| 5 | 129.8, CH | 116.2, CH | 129.1, CH | 129.8, CH |
| 6 | 125.1, C | 127.2, C | 127.5, C | 126.1, C |
| 7 | 124.3, C | 122.4, C | 122.5, C | 124.9, C |
| 8 | 122.8, CH | 125.0, CH | 125.2, CH | 123.1, CH |
| 10 | 133.2, C | 134.6, C | 134.8, C | 134.5, C |
| 11 | 167.7, C | 166.3, C | 166.5, C | n.o. |
| 12 | 124.7, C | 127.8, C | 128.0, C | 125.2, C |
| 14 | 121.2, CH | 123.1, CH | 123.3, CH | 123.9, CH |
| 15 | 117.4, C | 119.2, C | 119.4, C | 124.8, C |
| 16 | 17.9, CH2 | 17.6, CH2 | 17.8, CH2 | 114.0, CH |
| 17 | 49.7, CH2 | 45.0, CH2 | 45.0, CH2 | 140.6, CH |
| 19 | 154.1, C | 157.6, C | 157.0, C | 146.7, C |
| 20 | 121.6, C | 113.5, C | 113.5, C | 122.7, C |
| 21 | 121.8, C | 120.7, C | 120.9, C | 120.7, C |
a DMSO-d6; b CD3OD; c Retrieved from HSQC and HMBC spectra; d free base; e data from literature [30]; f TFA salt; n.o: not observed.
Figure 2Chemical structures of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 3Key two-dimensional (2D) NMR correlations observed for compounds 1 and 2. The COSY (in bold), key H→C HMBC (arrows), and H→H NOE (dashed line).
Figure 4(A) Calculated three-dimensional (3D) binding mode of 2 in the crystallographically determined active site of topoisomerase I (pdb 1T8I) also containing a DNA molecule (coloured in red) with a single strand break. (B) Corresponding 2D ligand interaction diagram showing key interactions of 2 to topoisomerase I and DNA. (C) Overlay of the binding pose of 2 (grey) with the original ligand camptothecin (turquoise) indicating similar ligand space occupied by the scaffolds.
Figure 53D binding poses and ligand interaction diagrams of 1 (A, green) and 2 (B, grey) in the crystallographically determined active site of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1) (pdb 6AZW) with key interactions. The binding pocket is shown in a similar orientation, respectively. Ligand docking revealed two different binding poses with 1 buried deeper in the pocket when compared to 2. Noteworthy, similar results were obtained by docking of 1 and 2 in IDO1 structure pdb 6AZV (not shown).