| Literature DB >> 30071102 |
Masanosuke Ishigami1,2, Hidetoshi Masumoto1,3, Takeshi Ikuno1,3, Takayuki Aoki1, Masahide Kawatou1,3, Kenji Minakata1, Tadashi Ikeda1, Ryuzo Sakata1, Jun K Yamashita3, Kenji Minatoya1.
Abstract
To realize human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based cardiac regenerative therapy, evidence of therapeutic advantages in human-sized diseased hearts are indispensable. In combination with an efficient and simultaneous differentiation of various cardiac lineages from hiPSCs and cell sheet technology, we aimed to generate clinical-sized large cardiac tissue sheets (L-CTSs) and to evaluate the therapeutic potential in porcine infarct heart. We simultaneously induced cardiomyocytes (CMs) and vascular cells [vascular endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular mural cells (MCs)] from hiPSCs. We generated L-CTSs using 10cm-sized temperature-responsive culture dishes. We induced myocardial infarction (MI) in micromini-pigs (15-25 kg) and transplanted the L-CTSs (Tx) 2 weeks after MI induction (4 sheets/recipient) under immunosuppression (Tx: n = 5, Sham: n = 5). Self-pulsating L-CTSs were approximately 3.5cm in diameter with 6.8×106±0.8 of cells containing cTnT+-CMs (45.6±13.2%), VE-cadherin+-ECs (5.3±4.4%) and PDGFRβ+-MCs (14.4±20.7%), respectively (n = 5). In Tx group, echocardiogram indicated a significantly higher systolic function of the left ventricle (LV) compared to that in sham control (Sham vs Tx: fractional shortening: 24.2±8.6 vs 40.5±9.7%; p<0.05). Ejection fraction evaluated by left ventriculogram was significantly higher in Tx group (25.3±6.2% vs 39.8±4.2%; p<0.01). Speckle tracking echocardiogram showed a significant increase of circumference strain in infarct and border regions after transplantation. Fibrotic area was significantly lower in Tx group (23.8±4.5 vs 15.9±3.8%; P<0.001). Capillary density in the border region was significantly higher in Tx group (75.9±42.6/mm2 vs 137.4±44.8/mm2, p<0.001). These data indicate that the L-CTS transplantation attenuated LV remodeling. L-CTSs potentially restore cardiac dysfunction of human-sized infarct heart.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30071102 PMCID: PMC6072021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Generation of large cardiac tissue sheets (L-CTSs).
(A) Optimal view of the L-CTS placed in a 10cm-sized UpCell dish. Scale bar = 1 mm. (B) (C) Calcium transient of L-CTSs. (B) Representative Fluo-8 image of L-CTS (see also S1 video) and region of interests (ROIs). Magnification ×100. (C) Chronologic intensity change of Fluo-8. Note that the peak timings of 4 different ROIs are almost same chronologically.
Fig 2Transplantation of L-CTSs onto porcine infarct hearts.
(A) Time course of the animal experiments. MI, myocardial infarction; UCG, ultrasound cardiogram (echocardiogram); LVG, left ventriculogram; Tx, treatment. (B) Surgical view during L-CTS transplantation. The first L-CTS is shown at black arrow and the second L-CTS is shown at white arrow. (C) M-mode view of the echocardiogram. Dotted yellow lines indicate the endocardial boundary of anterior or posterior wall. PreTx, before transplantation; Tx2w, 2 weeks after transplantation. (D) systolic function after transplantation. *p<0.05 vs Sham, ‡p<0.01 vs PreTx. (E) Left ventriculogram at 4 weeks after transplantation. Red: end-diastolic phase, orange: end-systolic phase. (F) Ejection fraction calculated by left ventriculogram. *p<0.05 vs Sham. PreMI, before MI induction.
Regional wall motion evaluated by circumference strain at base region.
| Base | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infero-Septal | Antero-Septal | Anterior* | Antero-Lateral | Infero-Lateral | Inferior* | ||
| Sham | PreMI (%) | 21.5±15.0 | 21.5±14.6 | 20.5±10.8 | 18.3±2.6 | 24.8±9.3 | 20.8±10.1 |
| PreTx (%) | 23.0±6.0 | 18.4±11.7 | 16.2±8.0 | 15.6±5.4 | 17.8±8.2 | 14.8±10.0 | |
| Tx2w (%) | 24.8±2.7 | 15.6±9.4 | 17.2±8.5 | 19.0±8.5 | 19.2±8.3 | 21.8±5.6 | |
| Tx4w (%) | 20.4±7.0 | 22.4±5.8 | 15.0±6.5 | 20.6±3.4 | 20.0±5.6 | 18.4±5.9 | |
| Tx4w/PreTx(ave.) | 0.89 | 1.22 | 0.93 | 1,32 | 1.12 | 1.24 | |
| Tx | PreMI (%) | 34.3±4.9 | 23.5±7.9 | 28.3±11.4 | 27.8±3.0 | 31.5±3.3 | 25.5±8.3 |
| PreTx (%) | 23.0±6.2 | 18.8±8.7 | 13.6±5.9 | 19.8±4.1 | 21.8±9.2 | 25.2±4.4 | |
| Tx2w (%) | 23.4±5.6 | 26.2±4.0 | 21.8±4.3 | 19.6±7.9 | 21.8±7.6 | 22.4±6.9 | |
| Tx4w (%) | 33.0±11.0 | 27.6±8.1 | 24.8±3.3 | 27.0±6.6 | 30.4±8.4 | 25.4±6.2 | |
| Tx4w/PreTx(ave.) | 1.43 | 1.47 | 1.82 | 1.36 | 1.39 | 1.01 | |
Regional wall motion evaluated by circumference strain at mid region.
| Mid | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infero-Septal | Antero-Septal | Anterior | Antero-Lateral | Infero-Lateral | Inferior | ||
| Sham | PreMI (%) | 35.5±11.9 | 23.8±16.1 | 25.0±15.3 | 28.5±10.9 | 32.0±15.8 | 28.8±17.1 |
| PreTx (%) | 26.4±8.3 | 19.2±4.7 | 11.6±3.8 | 14.4±3.5 | 21.4±4.4 | 18.0±6.7 | |
| Tx2w (%) | 22.8±10.0 | 11.6±5.2 | 10.8±4.1 | 13.0±6.5 | 16.6±10.6 | 15.6±9.7 | |
| Tx4w (%) | 23.6±7.7 | 17.6±4.4 | 15.2±6.5 | 18.8±4.2 | 23.2±9.0 | 22.2±6.2 | |
| Tx4w/PreTx(ave.) | 0.89 | 0.92 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.08 | 1.23 | |
| Tx | PreMI (%) | 34.5±9.5 | 29.0±8.0 | 37.0±7.1 | 32.3±7.1 | 29.8±15.9 | 32.3±7.6 |
| PreTx (%) | 23.8±4.4 | 14.0±8.3 | 11.6±9.4 | 17.0±6.6 | 20.2±3.1 | 25.8±8.0 | |
| Tx2w (%) | 34.6±8.6 | 19.2±8.3 | 20.6±3.5 | 24.8±7.6 | 23.2±4.7 | 23.0±5.4 | |
| Tx4w (%) | 38.0±1.9 | 21.2±6.6 | 21.2±8.1 | 24.0±4.1 | 30.0±6.1 | 26.2±4.4 | |
| Tx4w/PreTx(ave.) | 1.60 | 1.51 | 1.83 | 1.41 | 1.49 | 1.02 | |
*p<0.05 (2-way ANOVA; PreTX, Tx2w and Tx4w),
†p<0.05 (Tukey’s test; PreTx vs Tx4w).
Absolute values are shown.
Fig 3Attenuation of LV remodeling after L-CTS transplantation.
(A) Representative Masson’s trichrome staining at 4 weeks after transplantation. RV, right ventricle (removed). (B) The ratio of fibrotic area to the whole heart area. ***p<0.001. (C) Representative PAS staining of border region at 4 weeks after transplantation. Scale bar = 20 μm. (D) Cardiomyocyte diameter. ***p<0.001. (E) Representative vWF staining 4 weeks after L-CTS transplantation (brown). Scale bar = 20 μm. (F) Capillary density at border region. ***p<0.001. (G) Representative Ku80 staining (brown). Scale bar = 20 μm.