James J H Chong1, Xiulan Yang2, Creighton W Don3, Elina Minami4, Yen-Wen Liu2, Jill J Weyers2, William M Mahoney2, Benjamin Van Biber2, Savannah M Cook5, Nathan J Palpant2, Jay A Gantz6, James A Fugate2, Veronica Muskheli2, G Michael Gough7, Keith W Vogel7, Cliff A Astley7, Charlotte E Hotchkiss7, Audrey Baldessari7, Lil Pabon2, Hans Reinecke2, Edward A Gill3, Veronica Nelson8, Hans-Peter Kiem9, Michael A Laflamme2, Charles E Murry10. 1. 1] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [3] Department of Cardiology Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia [4] School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia [5] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [6] University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia and Westmead Millennium Institute and Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. 2. 1] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [3] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 3. Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 4. 1] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [3] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [4] Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 5. Department of Comparative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. 6. 1] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [3] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [4] Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 7. Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 8. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. 9. 1] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [2] Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. 10. 1] Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [2] Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA [3] Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [4] Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA [5] Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells provide a potential solution to current epidemic rates of heart failure by providing human cardiomyocytes to support heart regeneration. Studies of human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) in small-animal models have shown favourable effects of this treatment. However, it remains unknown whether clinical-scale hESC-CM transplantation is feasible, safe or can provide sufficient myocardial regeneration. Here we show that hESC-CMs can be produced at a clinical scale (more than one billion cells per batch) and cryopreserved with good viability. Using a non-human primate model of myocardial ischaemia followed by reperfusion, we show that cryopreservation and intra-myocardial delivery of one billion hESC-CMs generates extensive remuscularization of the infarcted heart. The hESC-CMs showed progressive but incomplete maturation over a 3-month period. Grafts were perfused by host vasculature, and electromechanical junctions between graft and host myocytes were present within 2 weeks of engraftment. Importantly, grafts showed regular calcium transients that were synchronized to the host electrocardiogram, indicating electromechanical coupling. In contrast to small-animal models, non-fatal ventricular arrhythmias were observed in hESC-CM-engrafted primates. Thus, hESC-CMs can remuscularize substantial amounts of the infarcted monkey heart. Comparable remuscularization of a human heart should be possible, but potential arrhythmic complications need to be overcome.
Pluripotent stem cells provide a potential solution to current epidemic rates of heart failure by providing human cardiomyocytes to support heart regeneration. Studies of human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) in small-animal models have shown favourable effects of this treatment. However, it remains unknown whether clinical-scale hESC-CM transplantation is feasible, safe or can provide sufficient myocardial regeneration. Here we show that hESC-CMs can be produced at a clinical scale (more than one billion cells per batch) and cryopreserved with good viability. Using a non-human primate model of myocardial ischaemia followed by reperfusion, we show that cryopreservation and intra-myocardial delivery of one billion hESC-CMs generates extensive remuscularization of the infarcted heart. The hESC-CMs showed progressive but incomplete maturation over a 3-month period. Grafts were perfused by host vasculature, and electromechanical junctions between graft and host myocytes were present within 2 weeks of engraftment. Importantly, grafts showed regular calcium transients that were synchronized to the host electrocardiogram, indicating electromechanical coupling. In contrast to small-animal models, non-fatal ventricular arrhythmias were observed in hESC-CM-engrafted primates. Thus, hESC-CMs can remuscularize substantial amounts of the infarcted monkey heart. Comparable remuscularization of a human heart should be possible, but potential arrhythmic complications need to be overcome.
Human pluripotent stem cells have indisputable cardiomyocyte generating abilities and
have been extensively investigated for repair of the injured heart [3,4,6-10]. These
stem cells are derived either from developing blastocytsts (human Embryonic Stem Cells; hESCs)
or from reprogrammed somatic cells (Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; iPSC) [11]. Whilst iPSCs have promising therapeutic potential
[10,12] a number of factors are likely to slow their regulatory approval [2]. hESC derivatives, on the other hand, are already
being tested in humans for retinal diseases and spinal cord injury [13,14]. These
indications require small numbers of differentiated cells, ranging from 104 to
107. In contrast, cardiac repair will require orders of magnitude more cells,
since a billion cardiomyocytes are lost after a typical infarct [2]. It is currently unknown whether this large-scale
production of hESC-CMs is feasible. Furthermore, it remains unclear if the favorable cardiac
repair findings in small animal models will be reproduced in more clinically relevant large
animal models. As an important translational step towards creating a viable clinical therapy,
we investigated the ability of exogenously delivered hESC-CMs to engraft and electrically
couple to infarcted host myocardium in a non-human primate (NHP) model of myocardial
infarction (MI). Significantly, this model provides a heart size and rate more comparable to
the human.Extrapolating results from our previous studies [6-8,15], we reasoned that significant engraftment in the larger NHP heart
required delivery of 1 × 109 cells. Feasibility of this large-scale hESC-CM
delivery requires cryopreservation of cells, which we validated in an established
immunodeficientmouse model of MI [15].
Similar to previous reports, [16] we found no
adverse impact of cryopreservation on hESC-CM graft size (Extended Data Fig. 1). Therefore, delivery of cryopreserved hESC-CMs appears to be a
sound strategy for large-scale transplantation in large animals or humans.
Extended Data Figure 1
Cryopreservation does not affect hESC-CM engraftment
(a) Schematic representation of experimental design for
cryopreservation testing experiments. (b) Human genomes detected after
injection of cryopreserved or non-cryopreserved hESC-CM were not significantly different
(p>0.05, t-test). Mean ± standard error is shown (n=9 biological
replicates).
We previously used zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)-mediated gene targeting to create
hESC-CMs (H7 parental ESC line) stably expressing the genetically encoded fluorescent calcium
indicator, GCaMP3, from the AAVS1 locus (Extended Data Fig.
2) [7]. These were used to prove
exogenously delivered hESC-CMs could electrically couple to the host heart in a guinea pig MI
model [7]. For the initial NHP experiments we
used this same cell line. Routine karyotyping after two experiments revealed duplication of
the long arm of chromosome 20 (Extended Data Fig. 3a).
Reanalysis of two previous karyotypes from this line revealed this subtle duplication to be
present in cells delivered to both monkeys. Since the effect of this abnormality on hESC-CM
engraftment and function is unknown, we created another karyoptyically normal GCaMP3 hESC cell
line for comparison. The ZFN approach was again used to target the GCaMP3 construct to the
AAVS1 locus (Extended Data Fig. 2a) in Rockefeller
University Embryonic Stem Cell line 2 (RUES2) hESCs. Southern blotting revealed correct
targeting of the construct (Extended Data Fig. 2b) and
karyotyping was normal after expansion (Extended Data Fig.
3b). For both of these hESC-GCaMP3 lines we used our well-established monolayer
protocol of directed differentiation (as above) to produce a high yield of cardiomyoctes
[8]. Flow cytometry was used to assess
cardiomyocyte purity, and the hESC-CMs used in these studies were
73+/−12% positive for cardiac TroponinT (cTnT; Extended Data Fig. 4). Spontaneous beating was observed in
vitro for hESC-GCaMP3-CM with robust fluorescence with each contractile cycle
(Supplementary Videos
1–2).
Extended Data Figure 2
Creation and validation of the GCaMP3-expressing hESC lines
(a) Targeting construct for zinc finger nuclease engineering of
GCaMP3 into the AAVS1 locus. The endogenous genomic probe and neomycin resistance gene
probe binding sites used for Southern blotting are shown. (b) Southern blot
analysis demonstrates a single integration event by hybridization for neomycin
resistance cassette (left) and heterozygous AAVS1 integration by genomic probe labelling
(right).
Extended Data Figure 3
Chromosomal analysis of hESCs modified to encode GCaMP3
(a) H7-GCaMP3 ESC line demonstrate an isochrome of the chromosome
20 long arm (arrow). (b) RUES2-GCaMP3 ESC line show normal karyotype.
Extended Data Figure 4
Flow cytometry for cardiomyocyte differentiation of hESCs
Representative histogram of hESC-CM after differentiation shows 73%
cTnT-expressing cells. cTnT = cardiac troponin T.
Seven pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) were used for the study
without randomization (Table 1). MI was created by
percutaneous ischemia-reperfusion 2 weeks prior and immunosuppression commenced 5 days prior
to hESC-CM delivery (see methods and Extended Data Fig.
5). hESC-CMs were delivered into the infarct region and surrounding border zones
under direct surgical visualization using a method optimized to aid cell retention (Extended Data Fig. 6). All macaques underwent full necropsy
after sacrifice. Consistent with our previous results [6-8,15] no macroscopic or microscopic evidence of teratoma or other tumor was
detected, and human cells were not identified outside the heart. All macaques had patchy
transmural MIs. Infarct sizes in sham-treated hearts (14 and 28 d) were 7.3 and 10.4%
of the left ventricle (LV; Table 1), whereas infarcts
in cell-treated hearts ranged from 3.7–9.5% of the LV (mean of 5.2±1.5
% of LV; Table 1). All hESC-CM-treated monkeys
showed significant remuscularization of the infarct areas (Fig.
1 a–g, Extended Data Fig. 7). Graft
size, calculated on the basis of green fluorescence protein (GFP) expression, ranged from
0.7–5.3% of the LV (mean of 2.1±1.1 % of LV, Table 1), averaging 40% of the infarct volume. Greater than
98% of engrafted human cells expressed the sarcomeric protein α-actinin (Extended Data Fig. 8a), indicating that almost all graft
cells were cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, these hESC-CM displayed increased maturation from 14 d
to 84 d, evidenced by increased myofibril alignment, sarcomere registration and cardiomyocyte
diameter (Fig. 2 a–c, Extended Data Fig 8 b–f). As these conclusions are drawn from
small animal numbers per time-point (n=1 each for 14 d and 84 d, n=2 for 28
d), maturation will require further validation. Cardiomyocyte diameter of 84 d grafts was
10.9±2 μm, approximately the size of normal adult monkey cardiomyocytes (10.1
μm) and approaching the 11–13 μm diameter of normal adult human
hearts[17]. Additionally, a maturation
gradient was apparent, with cardiomyocytes at the edge of grafts exhibiting greater maturation
than those within the central core (Fig. 2 f–k).
There were frequent host-graft contacts (Fig. 1 g) where
nascent intercalated disks formed and expressed the adherens junction protein N-cadherin and
the gap junction protein connexin 43. From 14 d to 84 d the expression of these junctional
proteins increased significantly (Fig. 2 d–e,
l–q). Few CD3+ T-lymphocytes or CD20+
B-lymphocytes were found within or around the hESC-CM grafts, suggesting our immunosuppression
successfully prevented graft rejection (Extended Data Fig.
9).
Table 1
Characteristics of macaques used in the study with summary of morphometry and calcium
imaging.
ID
Sex
Age
Body Weight (kg)
Heart Weight (g)
LV Weight (g)
Treatment
Endpoint
Infarct Mass (g)
Infarct Size (%LV)
Graft Mass (g)
Graft Size (%LV)
Graft Coupled (%)
P2
F
10y6m
8.6
39
23.3
No-cell control
2 weeks (sham)
1.7
7.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
P3
F
11y8m
9.2
38
14.9
H7-GCAMP3 CM
2 weeks (cells)
0.8
5.3
0.2
1.3
100
P4
M
9y5m
9.5
37
19.9
H7-GCAMP3 CM
4 weeks (cells)
1.9
9.5
0.2
0.7
100
P5
M
6y
12.3
52
20.7
RUES2-GCAMP3 CM
4 weeks (cells)
0.5
2.5
1.1
5.3
100
P6
M
5y
9.7
48
29.3
RUES2-GCAMP3 CM
12 weeks (cells)
1.1
3.7
0.3
1.0
100
P7
F
14y
8.37
36
19.5
No-cell control
4 weeks (sham)
2.0
10.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
ID = animal identifier. LV = left ventricle.
Extended Data Figure 5
Schematic representation of experimental design
Myocardial infarction (MI) was created by advancing a balloon catheter into
the distal left anterior descending artery and inflating it to create ischemia (90
minutes) followed by reperfusion. The infarct was induced 14 days prior to hESC-CM
delivery via left thoracotomy. Immunosuppression using cyclosporine A,
methylprednisolone and abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) was delivered 5 days prior to cell delivery
continuing until euthanasia of animals. Primary endpoints were 1) histologically based
morphometric calculations of infarct and graft size with analysis of graft composition,
2) ex vivo analysis of graft-host electromechanical coupling enabled by
GCaMP3 fluorescence detection. Secondary endpoints were 1) detection of arrhythmias by
telemetric electrocardiogram analysis and 2) analysis of left ventricular functional
change by trans-esophageal echocardiography.
Extended Data Figure 6
Technique for hESC-CM injection to infarct region and border zones using
“mattress” suture strategy
(a) The macaque infarcted ventricular apex is seen by blanched
region (dotted line) during left thoracotomy. A total of 15 aliquots, each containing
100 μL of hESC-CM in pro-survival cocktail, were delivered via 5 epicardial
puncture sites (arrows, note one further puncture site not seen is on posterior aspect).
(b) hESC-CM retention after injection was increased by use of a
“matress suture”. X = insertion points of suture with dotted
lines representing path of suture (exaggerated size for diagrammatic representation).
Needle tip was inserted into the resulting rectangular area and suture tightened after
series of three injections (altering trajectory of needle) but before withdrawal of
needle tip. (c) Quantitation of India ink retention after injection into
left ventricular myocardium of anaesthetised macaques with or without use of the
mattress suture technique (n=3 each group). A trend favouring greater retention
with the mattress suture is seen.
Figure 1
Remuscularization of the infarcted macaque heart with human cardiomyocytes
Confocal immunofluorescence of macaque hearts subjected to myocardial infarction and
transplantation of hESC-CM. Grafts studied at 14 days (a–g) and 84
days post-engraftment (h–i). (a) Remuscularization of a
substantial portion of the infarct region (dashed line) with hESC-CM co-expressing green
fluorescent protein (GFP). The contractile protein α-Actinin (red) is expressed by
both monkey and human cardiomyocytes. Scale bar, 1000 μm.
(b–f) Images from the peri-infarct region of the same heart shown
in (a), demonstrating significant hESC-CM engraftment. Scale bar, 1000
μm. (g) Graft-host interface at 14 days with interconnected
α-Actinin (red) expressing cardiomyocytes (arrows). Note host sarcomeric
cross-striations (asterisk) show greater alignment than hESC-CM graft. Scale bar 25
μm (h–i) Day-84 hESC-CM grafts contain host-derived blood
vessels lined by CD31+ endothelial cells. Scale bar 20 μm. Inset scale bar
10 μm.
Extended Data Figure 7
Remuscularization of the infarcted macaque heart
(a–f) Single channels of confocal immunofluorescence
shown in Fig. 1 (a–f). Macaque heart shown
was subjected to myocardial infarction and transplantation of hESC-CM 14 days prior to
sacrifice. GFP=green fluorescence protein.
(a′–f′) Picrosirius Red staining of
sections in close proximity to confocal immunofluorescence in (a–f) shows lack
of fibrosis within hESC-CM grafts.
Extended Data Figure 8
Remuscularized infarct region is composed of engrafted cardiomyocytes that increase
in size with time
(a) Quantification of the sarcomeric protein α-Actinin expression in
green fluoresnce protein (GFP) expressing grafts. The vast majority (>98%) of
GFP-expressing cells co-expressed α-Actinin. P3-P6 represent individual animals
(n=1) sacrificed at 2 weeks (2 wk) 1 month (m) or 3 months after hESC-CM
delivery. 500–700 cells were counted from 3 different graft regions of each
heart. Percentage of cells GFP/α-Actinin double positive and GFP
positive/α-Actinin negative are shown as mean +/− SD. (b) Normal
curve from histograms showing the distribution of hESC derived cardiomyocyte diameters
(graft) in monkey hearts 2 weeks, 1 or 3 months after cell delivery. (e–f)
Individual histograms with superimposed normal curve of each animal P3-P6 (as
above).
Figure 2
Human cardiomyocyte grafts exhibit maturation with time from engraftment
(a) Cardiomyocyte diameter of hESC-CM shows significant increase from 14
(n=1) to 28 (n=2) days and from 28 to 84 (n=1) days after
engraftment. Adult monkey (n=2). From each animal (n), 200–400 cells were
counted from 3 histological sections at varied left ventricular levels. Mean ±
standard error is shown. (b–q) Confocal immunofluorescence of macaque
hearts subjected to myocardial infarction and transplantation of hESC-CM 14 days
(b,d, f–h, l–n) or 84 days (c,e, i–k,
o–q) after engraftment. Increased sarcomere alignment, cardiomyocyte size
in hESC-CM (GFP+) is seen in longer term grafts
(b–c). Cx43 expression is not evident in hESC-CM grafts at 14 days
but is seen at 84 days (d–e). Cardiomyocytes at the edges of grafts
(g,j,m,p) display greater maturation compared to those at central core
(h,k,n,q) evidenced by increased size, α-actinin staining
intensity, sarcomere alignment (g–k) and N-cadherin expression
(m–q). Scale bar for panels f,i,l and
o = 200μm. All other scale bars 25 μm. GFP
= green fluorescent protein. Cx43 = connexin 43. Yellow and white boxes
correspond to higher power fields of graft edge and core respectively.
Extended Data Figure 9
No evidence of human graft rejection
Representative low (d–f) and high
(a–c and g–i) power magnification of hESC-CM
graft 28 days after cell delivery to infarcted macaque heart. Representative low
(j–k) and high (l–m) power magnification of
infarct region from control macaque 28 days after sham treatment. The hESC-CM graft is
detected by anti-green fluorescent protein primary antibody with
3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection of secondary antibody (brown). Few
CD3+ T-lymphocytes or CD20+ B-lymphocytes are
seen surrounding the hESC-CM grafts. Comparable numbers of T and B cells are seen in
control infarcts receiving no hESC-CM treatment. Boxed inset regions show areas of
higher magnification.
hESC-CM grafts were perfused by host vessels, evidenced by anti-CD31 immunostaining
without GFP co-expression (Fig. 1 h). Microcomputed
tomography was used to image the 3-dimensional (3D) structure of coronary vasculature and
correlated to aligned histological sections, permitting analysis of coronary anatomy within
the graft, scar and remote myocardium (Fig. 3
a–d, Supplementary Video
3). Graft and scar regions were integrated into the 3D vascular network, revealing
arteries and veins supplying the hESC-CM graft that were connected to the host system. This
shows, for the first time, that large hESC-CM grafts are successfully perfused by host
vasculature and are viable long term.
Figure 3
Blood vessels extend from the host coronary network into the graft
(a–c) 3-dimensional rendered microcomputed tomography of heart
perfused with Microfil at 3 months after hESC-CM injection. (b) shows higher
power view of boxed area from (a). (c) shows cross-sectional cut
plane through the heart at the location of the dotted line in (a). Arteries
perfusing the graft are red, other vessels are gray in the uninjured cardiac tissue, or
white within the graft. The vessels within the graft are better visualized in Supplementary Video 6.
(d) Histological section of heart shown in (a–c)
immunostained with an anti-green fluorescence protein antibody to mark the hESC-CM graft
(brown). This section corresponds to the same location of the cross-sectional cut plane in
panel (c). Black dots are Microfil within coronary vessels.
To investigate electromechanical coupling of hESC-CM grafts to the host, hearts from
all macaques were subjected to ex vivo fluorescent imaging using a modified
Langendorff perfusion system (Supplementary
Video 4). Hearts were perfused with 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM, a myosin
crossbridge inhibitor) to uncouple electrical cardiomyocyte excitation from mechanical
contraction. This removed confounding motion artifact and prevented indirect graft activation
by passive stretching. Epicardial fluorescent calcium transients were seen in all
hESC-CM-treated hearts, indicating electrical activation of the cardiomyocyte grafts (Figs. 4 a–d and Supplementary Videos 5–6). Furthermore, 100% of the visible
hESC-CM grafts in every monkey showed electromechanical coupling to the host heart (Table 1). Graft-host coupling was evidenced by epicardial
fluorescent transients that were synchronous with the host electrocardiogram (ECG) QRS
complexes during spontaneous depolarization (Fig. 4 e).
hESC-CM grafts retained 1:1 coupling to host myocardium during atrial pacing at rates of up to
240 beats per minute, the highest rate tested (Fig. 4
f–h).
Figure 4
Human cardiomyocytes are electrically coupled 1:1 to the infarcted host macaque heart
after transplantation
(a) Diagram showing regions of the infarcted macaque heart visualized in
(b–d). Analysis shown is from ex vivo imaging 14
days after hESC-CM delivery. (b) Still image from low power fluorescence
video showing regions of hESC-CM engraftment (red and blue rectangles).
(c–d) Still images of calcium indicator GCaMP3-positive hESC-CM
grafts (bottom left of panel b) during diastole and systole. Note the gain of
fluorescence during systole. (e–h) GCaMP3 fluorescence intensity (AU
= arbitrary units) and electrocardiogram (ECG) versus time for the grafted regions
of interest shown in (b). Each graft region shows 1:1 coupling synchronous
with host ventricular contraction (ECG QRS complex) during (e) spontaneous
rhythm or (f–h) atrial pacing. All hESC-CM grafts identified in every
transplanted animal showed 1:1 coupling.
To explore the electrophysiological consequences of our hESC-CM grafts, we analyzed
ECGs obtained by telemetry from the time of infarction until sacrifice. Continuous ECG
recordings were taken regularly and 24-hour periods (midnight to midnight) analyzed. Control
macaques with MI and sham (vehicle only) injection maintained normal sinus rhythm with heart
rates of 100–130 beats/min throughout the experiment (Fig. 5 a). No arrhythmias were noted in hESC-CM treated monkeys during the period
after MI but before hESC-CM delivery (Fig. 5
e–h). In contrast, all macaques that received hESC-CMs displayed arrhythmias.
These included premature ventricular contractions and runs of ventricular tachycardia (VT,
defined as wide QRS complex (>60 ms) with rate > 180 beats/min (Fig. 5c)). Frequent wide QRS complex rhythms with rates similar to
baseline (accelerated idioventricular rhythm; AIVR (Fig.
5b)) were also observed. Significantly, all animals remained conscious and in no
distress during all periods of arrhythmia.
Figure 5
Ventricular arrhythmias after hESC-CM transplantation
(a–d) Representative traces from macaque telemetric
electrocardiogram recordings showing (a) Normal sinus rhythm (SR),
(b) Accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR) (c) Ventricular
tachycardia (VT) and (d) Non-sustained VT (NSVT). Scale bar 1 sec.
(e–h) Frequency of arrhythmias is highest within the first 2 weeks
after hESC-CM transplantation. P2-7 designations are animal identifiers. Animals receiving
vehicle only (no cells, P2 and P7) remained in SR throughout. Interrupted Y-axis in
(e–f) denotes reduced number of episodes but increased total duration of
arrhythmias (VT or AIVR more than 18 hr per 24 hr period).
To investigate LV function, we performed transesophageal echocardiography prior to
MI, prior to hESC-CM delivery and prior to animal sacrifice (Extended Data Fig. 10b). Multiple transesophageal and deep transgastric views were
analyzed by cardiologists blinded to experimental details. One control animal did not have
images of sufficient quality for analysis. The other control demonstrated a decline in
ejection fraction after MI that was unchanged after sham cell injection. The hearts receiving
hESC-CM showed variable responses, some showing increased ejection fraction after treatment
and others showing no improvement. Due to the small group sizes, no statistically significant
effects were noted.
Extended Data Figure 10
Summary of ventricular tachycardia and echocardiographic assessment of left
ventricular function
(a) Table characterizing episodes of ventricular tachycardia
after engraftment of hESC-CM (detailed in Fig. 5).
Note that P5 demonstrated no discernible sinus rhythm on telemetric recording of
electrocardiogram 14 days after hESC-CM delivery. Although QRS morphology varied the
tachyarrhythmia comprised sustained periods of stable monomorphic QRS morphology.
LBBB=left bundle branch block. RBBB=Right bundle branch block.
ms=milliseconds. bpm=beats per minute. (b) Left ventricular
function was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography at the following time points:
prior to myocardial infarct (MI) creation, prior to hESC-CM delivery (2 weeks after MI)
and prior to euthanasia (2, 4 or 12 weeks after MI). P7 received no-cells/vehicle only.
All other animals received hESC-CM. Results shown are for left ventricular ejection
fraction calculated by two blinded cardiologists from the 2-chamber view of the left
ventricle. Note that this view best captures the infarcted antero-apical wall. The
vehicle-treated control monkey showed a modest diminution in ejection fraction
post-infarction. The cell-treated animals showed variable responses, with some having
increased function and some having decreased function. Because of small group size, no
statistical effects of hESC-CM therapy can be discerned. (c) Table of antibodies used.
Abbreviations: DSHB = Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank.
These experiments demonstrate that hESCs can be grown, differentiated into
cardiomyocytes and cryopreserved at a scale sufficient to treat a large animal model of MI.
With further refinements in manufacturing, scale up to trials in humanpatients appears
feasible. Large animal models are important forerunners to human trials, because they impart
real-world rigor to issues such as cell production, delivery and end-point analyses, while
permitting mechanistic studies not possible in patients [18,19]. We observed extensive
remuscularization of the infarcts in all animals, with grafts averaging 40% of infarct
mass. Importantly, all of the human cardiomyocytes showed complete electrical coupling to the
primate heart and responded normally to pacing up to 240 beats/min (the fastest rate
attempted). The coupling in the current study was greater than observed in our guinea pig
model, where only 60% of recipient hearts had grafts that were synchronized with the
host [7]. Enhanced coupling may result from the
use of an ischemia-reperfusion model in the current study, which gives patchier infarcts with
more peninsulas of viable host tissue than the guinea pig cryoinjury model.Our previous studies in mice [15],
rats [6,8] and guinea pigs [7] gave no
evidence of arrhythmias after hESC-CM engraftment, whereas arrhythmias were consistently
observed in the current study. There are several possible mechanisms for the observed
arrhythmias, including re-entrant circuits or graft automaticity [20-22]. Further
studies are required to distinguish between these possibilities. In considering why
arrhythmias were observed in monkeys and not smaller animals, the two most likely reasons
appear to be differences in heart size and rate. Regarding size, the larger hearts of adult
macaques (37–52 g) compared to hearts of mice (0.15 g), rats (1 g) and guinea pigs (3
g) allows for more hESC-CMs to be delivered, and resultant grafts are approximately 10-fold
larger than the largest obtained in other species [7]. Ventricular depolarization over integrated but relatively immature hESC-CM
grafts may slow conduction of the overall wave-front. Whilst not problematic over short
distances in small grafts, over longer distances (in large grafts) this may favor formation of
reentrant loops. It is noteworthy that the animal (P5) with the largest hESC-CM graft size
also had the highest frequency of arrhythmia. Another important factor is the species-specific
heart rates (macaques: 100–130 beats/min, vs. guinea-pigs: 230, rats: ~400, mice
~600). Faster spontaneous rates will favor ventricular capture from native conduction pathways
rather than graft automaticity or re-entrant loops, and this would likely prevent sustained
ventricular arrhythmias. These factors are relevant to clinical translation given that the
human heart is larger (300g) with a slower basal rate (70 beats/min) than macaques used in
this study.The principal limitations of this study are the small numbers of animals used and
their relatively small infarct sizes. Both limitations stem from the high cost/value of the
primate model. Consequently, we cannot determine with statistical certainty that the observed
arrhythmias directly result from transplanted hESC-CM. Larger studies will be required to
assess this and treatment effects on cardiac function. Importantly, infarct sizes in this
study were smaller than the clinically severe infarcts that might benefit most from hESC-CM
therapy. Larger infarcts, in human hearts, might manifest more arrhythmias. Because
ventricular arrhythmias can be life-threatening, they need to be understood mechanistically
and managed en route to safe clinical translation. Nevertheless, the extent of
remuscularization and electromechanical coupling seen here encourages further development of
human cardiomyocyte transplantation as a clinical therapy for heart failure.
Methods
Cell preparation
Undifferentiated H7 [24] or
RUES2 hESCs [25] were expanded using mouse
embryonic fibroblast-conditioned medium (MEF-CM) [26] supplemented with basic fibroblast growth factor (R&D Systems).
H7 line was obtained from WiCEll and RUES2 line from Rockefeller University. Both lines
were regularly karyotyped and tested for mycoplasma. hESCs were then differentiated into
cardiomyocytes using a previously reported directed differentiation protocol. Briefly,
activin A (R&D Systems) and bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4, R&D) are applied
to defined, serum-free, monolayer culture conditions [27,28]. hESC-CMs were collected
and cryopreserved after 16 to 20 days of CM differentiation. One day before collection,
cells were subjected to a pro-survival “cocktail” (PSC) protocol,
previously shown to enhance engraftment after transplantation [28]. Briefly, cultures were heat-shocked with a 30-min
exposure to 43°C medium, followed by RPMI-B27 medium supplemented with IGF1 (100
ng ml−1, Peprotech) and cyclosporine A (0.2 mM, Sandimmune, Novartis).
One day later, cultures were collected with 0.25% trypsin per 0.5 mM EDTA
(Invitrogen) and cryopreserved as described previously [29]. Immediately before transplantation, cells were thawed
at 37 °C, washed with RPMI, and suspended in a 1.5 ml volume (per animal) of
modified PSC consisting of 50% (v/v) growth factor–reduced Matrigel,
supplemented with, Bcl-XL BH4 (cell-permeant TAT peptide, 50 nM, Calbiochem), cyclosporine
A (200 nM, Wako), IGF1 (100 ng ml−1, Peprotech) and pinacidil (50 mM,
Sigma).
Generation of the GCaMP reporter hESC line
A transgene encoding for the constitutive expression of GCaMP3 was inserted into
the AAVS1 locus in H7 and RUES2 hESCs, using methods adapted from a previous study
[30] (see Extended Data Fig. 2). In brief, the right and left arms of an
AAVS1-specific ZFN were de novo synthesized (Genscript) and cloned into a single
polycistronic plasmid in which the expression of each was driven by an independent human
PGK promoter. A second polycistronic vector was generated in which (approximately 800-bp)
homology arms flanking the AAVS1 ZFN cut site (pZDonor, Sigma Aldrich) surrounded a 5.1-kb
insert with two elements: a cassette in which the CAG promoter drives expression of GCaMP3
(Addgene, plasmid #22692) and a second cassette encoding for PGK-driven expression
of neomycin resistance. AAVS1 ZFN (5-mg) and AAVS1 CAG GCaMP3 targeting vector plasmids
were co-electroporated (Lonza, Nucleofection system) into hESCs cultured in MEF-CM
supplemented with 10 mM Y-27632. Green fluorescent colonies were isolated and expanded and
selected with 40 to 100 μg/ml G418 (Invitrogen) for 5 to 10 days.
Southern blot analysis
Wild-type and transgenic GCaMP3-positive hESC genomic DNA were digested with the
restriction enzyme NdeI and NheI, run on 1% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to
a membrane (BioRad Zeta Probe). The membrane was washed in 2xSSC and dried at 80°C
in a hybridization oven for 2 h, followed by 1h of pre-hybridization in 50%
formamide, 0.12 M NaH2PO4, 0.25 M NaCl, 7% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA at 43 degrees
Celsius. A genomic probe was generated using the following primers: GGAGGTGGTGCGCTTCTTGG
(forward), CGCATCCCCTCCCAGAAAGAC (reverse), and neomycin cassette probe:
ATGGGATCGGCCATTGAACAAG (forward), GAAGAACTCGTCAAGAAGGCG (reverse). The probes were labeled
with p32dCTP (Amersham Megaprime DNA labeling system) and hybridized overnight in
hybridization buffer at 43 degrees Celsius. After 24 hours, the membrane was washed for 20
min with 2xSSC/0.1% SDS followed by 20 min in 0.1xSSC/0.1% SDS. The
membrane was then exposed to autoradiographic film for 3 days.
Animal Models
All procedures complied with and were approved by the University of Washington
Animal Care and Use Committee.
Mouse Surgery
SCID-BEIGE mice (Taconic Farm) were anaesthetized with Avertin, intubated and
ventilated before undergoing thoracotomy and ligation of the left anterior descending
artery. Immediately after ligation 1 x105 hESC-CM (freshly isolated or
cryopreserved) in a volume of 5μL was injected directly into the infarct region
and surrounding border zones. Five days after MI creation mice were sacrificed and hearts
collected for analysis for detection of human cell grafts by methods previously described
[31] (see below and Extended Data Fig. 1).
Non-Human Primate Surgery
Macaca nemestrina (8.6–12.3 kg, Washington National
Primate Center) of either sex were used for these experiments. Macaques first underwent a
2 week period of acclimation and training to wear a mesh jacket to prevent removal of
intravenous (IV) catheter. Five days prior to MI, macaques were treated with amiodarone
100 mg daily with feed 5 days prior to MI and continued for further 10 days after MI. For
all major surgery macaques were anaesthetized with ketamine and propofol, intubated and
ventilated using sevoflurane to maintain anesthesia. Fentanyl and buprenorphine were
administered to provide perioperative and postoperative pain relief. Prior to each major
surgery transesophageal echocardiography was performed using a Phillips HD-11XE ultrasound
machine with an S7-2 MHz transesophageal probe.Prior to MI creation IVlidocaine bolus 1mg/kg and infusion 20 mcg/kg/min was
used to prevent ventricular arrhythmias. Heparin was delivered IV to maintain activated
clotting times of 250–350 seconds to prevent thrombosis. Under fluoroscopic
guidance a 9F coronary catheter was used to engage the left main coronary artery. A guide
wire and angioplasty balloon was passed into the mid-left anterior descending artery and
the balloon inflated for 90 minutes. MI was confirmed by ST segment elevation on ECG and
by subsequent serum assays for cardiac troponin and creatine kinase. For telemetric
monitor implantation a CTA-D70 (Data Sciences International) transmitter was placed
subcutaneously over the abdomen with leads tunneled subcutaneously in a modified lead II
configuration. Immune suppression was achieved by methylprednisolone IV 500mg on day of
hESC-CM delivery then maintenance doses of 0.1–1.5 mg/kg until sacrifice,
cyclosporine to maintain serum trough levels of 200–250 μg/L from 5 days
prior hESC-CM delivery until sacrifice and Abatacept (CTLA4 immunoglobulin) 12.5 mg/kg on
day prior to hESC-CM and every 2 weeks thereafter. To prevent opportunistic infections
broad spectrum antibiotics and anti-fungal agents were administered.On day 14 after MI, macaques were anaesthetized and underwent left thoracotomy.
The heart was exposed and a pericardial cradle created. The infarct region was directly
visualized and hESC-CM delivered intramyocardially into the infarct region and adjacent
border-zones, via 15 injections each of 100 μL volume. Needle tips were placed
within a preformed mattress suture, and 3 injections were delivered via the same
epicardial puncture, changing the trajectory of the needle for each. Before withdrawal of
the needle the mattress suture was closed around the needle tip. For control macaques, an
equal volume of PSC-RPMI was injected in the same manner as for hESC-CM delivery. hESC-CM
treated animals also received epicardial application of 1–3 tissue-engineering
constructs where hESC-CM were seeded in a collagen scaffold. (These tissue engineered
constructs did not adhere to the epicardial surface and were not recovered at the end of
the experiment.) Euthanasia, was induced by IV injection of pentobarbital and phenytoin
(Beuthanasia-D) followed by supersaturated KCl and Beuthanasia (CIII). Hearts were removed
and perfused retrogradely with University of Wisconsin cardioplegia solution before
transportation on ice for calcium imaging experiments. Eight macaques were subjected to
myocardial infarction. One was euthanized two days post-infarction (no treatment) because
of lower limb ischemia secondary to arterial thrombosis and was the only animal excluded
from analysis. All others survived to the completion of the experiment. Two macaques (1
cell-treated and 1 vehicle-only control) were sacrificed at 14 d, 3 macaques (2
cell-treated and 1 vehicle-only control) were sacrificed at 28 d, and 1 cell-treated
monkey was sacrificed 84 d (3 m) after hESC-CM delivery.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) detection of hESC grafts
A high throughput method of human cell detection was used as previously reported
[31]. Briefly, hearts from mice
engrafted with hESC-CM were washed, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized using a
dis-membranator (Braun). Samples were resuspended in 200 μL of RNase/DNase free
water supplemented with proteinase K and Chelex beads. Samples were centrifuged and a 2
μL sample of the DNA containing supernatant removed for subsequent PCR using
Alu-specific primers. Data were compared to standard curves generated with known human DNA
quantities.
Imaging of GCaMP3-expresssing grafts
Intravital imaging of hearts with GCaMP3-positive grafts was performed on days
14, 28 or 84 after hESC-CM transplantation using ex vivo preparation. For these
experiments, the heart was mounted on a gravity-fed Langendorff apparatus and then
perfused at 100 mm Hg with modified Tyrode solution at 37 °C. The epicardial
GCaMP3 signal was then recorded before and after supplementation of the perfusate with
2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM, 20 mM) [32,33]. GCAMP3 signal was visualized using an
epifluorescence stereomicroscope (Nikon, SMZ 1000) equipped with an EXFO X-Cite
illumination source. GCaMP3 was excited at 450 to 490 nm and bandpass filtered (500 to 550
nm) before detection by an electron-multiplying, charge-coupled device camera (Andor iXon
860 EM-CCD) controlled by Andor Solis software. GCaMP3 image acquisition was typically at
80 to 140 frames per second (f.p.s.). Signals from the charge-coupled device (CCD) camera
and the surface ECG were fed through a computer for digital storage and off-line analysis
using Andor software and Labchart.
Echocardiography
Images were acquired with a HD11-XE (Phillips) with S7-2MHz transesophageal
probe. Transesophageal 4-Chamber, 2-Chamber and short Axis views were collected together
with deep trans-gastric short-axis views. Functional analysis was performed using XCelera
(Phillips) software by two independent cardiologists blinded to experimental
conditions.
Telemetric electrocardiography
ECG recordings were acquired from conscious, freely mobile animals using a
Dataquest ART telemetry system (DSI). Recordings from 24 hour periods (midnight to
midnight) were obtained from macaques with MI with or without hESC-CMs, delivery. All ECG
traces were evaluated manually by a cardiologist using Ponemah software (DSI) who
determined the total number and frequency of events. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was
defined as a run of 4 or more premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) with ventricular rate
of more than 180 beats per minute. Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm (AIVR) was defined
as 4 or more PVCs with rate of less than 180 bpm. VT or AIVR were considered sustained if
duration was greater than 30 seconds.
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
Histological studies were carried out as detailed previously by our group
[28,34,35] with some adaptation. For
immunohistochemistry, we used the primary antibodies detailed in Table S3, then either fluorescent secondary
antibodies (Alexa-conjugated, species-specific antibodies from Molecular Probes) or the
avidin biotin reaction followed by chromogenic detection (ABC kits from VectorLabs).
Paraformaldahyde fixed macaque hearts dissected to remove the atria and right ventricle
before cross-sections were obtained by sectioning parallel to the shortaxis at ~3 mm
thickness on a commerclial slicer (Berkel). Whole heart, left ventricle and each slice
were weighed prior to tissue processing. For morphometry, infarct regions were identified
by Picrosirius red staining and areas calculated using Nanozoomer scanning and software
(Hamamatsu). Graft sizes were calculated by anti-GFP staining. All immunofluorescent
images were collected by a Nikon A1 Confocal System attached to a Nikon Ti-E inverted
microscope platform and using water-immersion Nikon 60x CFI Plan Apo objective lens with
1.2 NA. Image acquisition was performed at room temperature using Nikon NIS Elements 3.1
software to capture 12-bit raw files that were then rescaled to 16-bit images for further
processing. All images were collected as a single scan with the pinhole adjusted to 1 Airy
unit at 1024×1024 pixel density. For figure preparation, images were exported into
Photoshop CS3 (Adobe). If necessary, brightness and contrast were adjusted for the entire
image and the image was cropped. Live cell imaging was performed using a Nikon Eclipse
TS100 inverted microscope with white light source and an X-Cite Series 120Q Laser. For
calculation of cardiomyocyte diameter, longitudinally sectioned cardiomyocytes were chosen
for measurement. Transversely or obliquely cut cardiomyocytes were excluded from
morphometric analysis. A point-to-point perpendicular measured line at the position of
midnucleus level and the diameter measured using software “Image J”
software (version 1.47). At least two hundred cardiomyocytes were measured in each
animal.
Microcomputerised Tomography Scanning and Image Analysis
Microfilled hearts were imaged in a Skyscan 1076 μCT scanner at 35
μm spatial resolution using the following settings: 55 kV, 180 mA, 0.5 mm Aluminum
filter, 220 ms exposure, rotation step of 0.5°, 180° scan, and 10X frame
averaging. Raw scan data were reconstructed to a 3D slice dataset with an isotropic
resolution of 35 μm using the software NRecon V1.6.1.0 (Skyscan, Belgium), and
analyzed using CTan (Skyscan) and Analyze 10.0 (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) as follows.
Samples were thresholded to a level where vessels separated into distinct entities to
allow visualization of individual networks. Non-vascular Microfil (e.g.: in the atria,
aorta, coronary sinus, etc.) was digitally removed in Analyze using the “Image
Segmentation” module. Then, delineation of graft and/or scar tissue was drawn in
CTan: histological sections of each heart slice (sliced at 2 mm thickness) stained to
highlight the graft and scar (Picrosirius red (scar), and GFP (graft) – see below)
were imported into the μCT 3D dataset by aligning and replacing 2D μCT
slices at 2 mm intervals. The graft and scar regions were manually outlined on these
histological pictures, and the region of interest (ROI) interpolation function in CTan
extended the ROI from the manually outlined slices across all slices to produce a 3D
representation of the graft or scar (Volume of Interest, VOI). The resulting graft/scar
VOI was then used to distinguish vessel location (i.e. graft, scar or uninjured cardiac
tissue) in subsequent analyses. Individual vessel segmentation to determine vessel
identity and branching pattern was performed using Analyze with the graft/scar VOI
imported from CTan. Arterial/venous identity in 3D renderings was assigned by determining
the origin of each vascular network (e.g. aorta, coronary sinus, etc).
Statistical analysis
All values were expressed as mean +/− standard error.
Statistical analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism software, with the threshold for
significance level set at P<0.05. For murine cryopreservation graft analysis study and
india ink injection experiments, paired t-test analysis of means was used.
Cryopreservation does not affect hESC-CM engraftment
(a) Schematic representation of experimental design for
cryopreservation testing experiments. (b) Human genomes detected after
injection of cryopreserved or non-cryopreserved hESC-CM were not significantly different
(p>0.05, t-test). Mean ± standard error is shown (n=9 biological
replicates).
Creation and validation of the GCaMP3-expressing hESC lines
(a) Targeting construct for zinc finger nuclease engineering of
GCaMP3 into the AAVS1 locus. The endogenous genomic probe and neomycin resistance gene
probe binding sites used for Southern blotting are shown. (b) Southern blot
analysis demonstrates a single integration event by hybridization for neomycin
resistance cassette (left) and heterozygous AAVS1 integration by genomic probe labelling
(right).
Chromosomal analysis of hESCs modified to encode GCaMP3
(a) H7-GCaMP3 ESC line demonstrate an isochrome of the chromosome
20 long arm (arrow). (b) RUES2-GCaMP3 ESC line show normal karyotype.
Flow cytometry for cardiomyocyte differentiation of hESCs
Representative histogram of hESC-CM after differentiation shows 73%
cTnT-expressing cells. cTnT = cardiac troponin T.
Schematic representation of experimental design
Myocardial infarction (MI) was created by advancing a balloon catheter into
the distal left anterior descending artery and inflating it to create ischemia (90
minutes) followed by reperfusion. The infarct was induced 14 days prior to hESC-CM
delivery via left thoracotomy. Immunosuppression using cyclosporine A,
methylprednisolone and abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) was delivered 5 days prior to cell delivery
continuing until euthanasia of animals. Primary endpoints were 1) histologically based
morphometric calculations of infarct and graft size with analysis of graft composition,
2) ex vivo analysis of graft-host electromechanical coupling enabled by
GCaMP3 fluorescence detection. Secondary endpoints were 1) detection of arrhythmias by
telemetric electrocardiogram analysis and 2) analysis of left ventricular functional
change by trans-esophageal echocardiography.
Technique for hESC-CM injection to infarct region and border zones using
“mattress” suture strategy
(a) The macaque infarcted ventricular apex is seen by blanched
region (dotted line) during left thoracotomy. A total of 15 aliquots, each containing
100 μL of hESC-CM in pro-survival cocktail, were delivered via 5 epicardial
puncture sites (arrows, note one further puncture site not seen is on posterior aspect).
(b) hESC-CM retention after injection was increased by use of a
“matress suture”. X = insertion points of suture with dotted
lines representing path of suture (exaggerated size for diagrammatic representation).
Needle tip was inserted into the resulting rectangular area and suture tightened after
series of three injections (altering trajectory of needle) but before withdrawal of
needle tip. (c) Quantitation of India ink retention after injection into
left ventricular myocardium of anaesthetised macaques with or without use of the
mattress suture technique (n=3 each group). A trend favouring greater retention
with the mattress suture is seen.
Remuscularization of the infarcted macaque heart
(a–f) Single channels of confocal immunofluorescence
shown in Fig. 1 (a–f). Macaque heart shown
was subjected to myocardial infarction and transplantation of hESC-CM 14 days prior to
sacrifice. GFP=green fluorescence protein.
(a′–f′) Picrosirius Red staining of
sections in close proximity to confocal immunofluorescence in (a–f) shows lack
of fibrosis within hESC-CM grafts.
Remuscularized infarct region is composed of engrafted cardiomyocytes that increase
in size with time
(a) Quantification of the sarcomeric protein α-Actinin expression in
green fluoresnce protein (GFP) expressing grafts. The vast majority (>98%) of
GFP-expressing cells co-expressed α-Actinin. P3-P6 represent individual animals
(n=1) sacrificed at 2 weeks (2 wk) 1 month (m) or 3 months after hESC-CM
delivery. 500–700 cells were counted from 3 different graft regions of each
heart. Percentage of cells GFP/α-Actinin double positive and GFP
positive/α-Actinin negative are shown as mean +/− SD. (b) Normal
curve from histograms showing the distribution of hESC derived cardiomyocyte diameters
(graft) in monkey hearts 2 weeks, 1 or 3 months after cell delivery. (e–f)
Individual histograms with superimposed normal curve of each animal P3-P6 (as
above).
No evidence of human graft rejection
Representative low (d–f) and high
(a–c and g–i) power magnification of hESC-CM
graft 28 days after cell delivery to infarcted macaque heart. Representative low
(j–k) and high (l–m) power magnification of
infarct region from control macaque 28 days after sham treatment. The hESC-CM graft is
detected by anti-green fluorescent protein primary antibody with
3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) detection of secondary antibody (brown). Few
CD3+ T-lymphocytes or CD20+ B-lymphocytes are
seen surrounding the hESC-CM grafts. Comparable numbers of T and B cells are seen in
control infarcts receiving no hESC-CM treatment. Boxed inset regions show areas of
higher magnification.
Summary of ventricular tachycardia and echocardiographic assessment of left
ventricular function
(a) Table characterizing episodes of ventricular tachycardia
after engraftment of hESC-CM (detailed in Fig. 5).
Note that P5 demonstrated no discernible sinus rhythm on telemetric recording of
electrocardiogram 14 days after hESC-CM delivery. Although QRS morphology varied the
tachyarrhythmia comprised sustained periods of stable monomorphic QRS morphology.
LBBB=left bundle branch block. RBBB=Right bundle branch block.
ms=milliseconds. bpm=beats per minute. (b) Left ventricular
function was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography at the following time points:
prior to myocardial infarct (MI) creation, prior to hESC-CM delivery (2 weeks after MI)
and prior to euthanasia (2, 4 or 12 weeks after MI). P7 received no-cells/vehicle only.
All other animals received hESC-CM. Results shown are for left ventricular ejection
fraction calculated by two blinded cardiologists from the 2-chamber view of the left
ventricle. Note that this view best captures the infarcted antero-apical wall. The
vehicle-treated control monkey showed a modest diminution in ejection fraction
post-infarction. The cell-treated animals showed variable responses, with some having
increased function and some having decreased function. Because of small group size, no
statistical effects of hESC-CM therapy can be discerned. (c) Table of antibodies used.
Abbreviations: DSHB = Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank.
Authors: Steven D Schwartz; Jean-Pierre Hubschman; Gad Heilwell; Valentina Franco-Cardenas; Carolyn K Pan; Rosaleen M Ostrick; Edmund Mickunas; Roger Gay; Irina Klimanskaya; Robert Lanza Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James J H Chong; Hans Reinecke; Mineo Iwata; Beverly Torok-Storb; April Stempien-Otero; Charles E Murry Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Rafael Lozano; Mohsen Naghavi; Kyle Foreman; Stephen Lim; Kenji Shibuya; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Timothy Adair; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Suzanne Barker-Collo; David H Bartels; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Kavi Bhalla; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Soufiane Boufous; Chiara Bucello; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Jonathan Carapetis; Honglei Chen; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Nabila Dahodwala; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Majid Ezzati; Valery Feigin; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Richard Franklin; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Yara A Halasa; Diana Haring; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Bruno Hoen; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Summer Lockett Ohno; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Leslie Mallinger; Lyn March; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; John McGrath; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Catherine Michaud; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Charles Mock; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Ali A Mokdad; Andrew Moran; Kim Mulholland; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Kiumarss Nasseri; Paul Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; David Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; C Arden Pope; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Murugesan Raju; Dharani Ranganathan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Felipe Rodriguez De León; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; Maria Segui-Gomez; Donald S Shepard; David Singh; Jessica Singleton; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Andrew Steer; Jennifer A Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; Imad M Tleyjeh; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Eduardo A Undurraga; N Venketasubramanian; Lakshmi Vijayakumar; Theo Vos; Gregory R Wagner; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; James D Wilkinson; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Paul Yip; Azadeh Zabetian; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jill J Weyers; Stephen M Schwartz; Elina Minami; Dara D Carlson; Sarah K Dupras; Kevin Weitz; Michael Simons; Timothy C Cox; Charles E Murry; William M Mahoney Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jay A Gantz; Nathan J Palpant; Robert E Welikson; Stephen D Hauschka; Charles E Murry; Michael A Laflamme Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yuji Shiba; Sarah Fernandes; Wei-Zhong Zhu; Dominic Filice; Veronica Muskheli; Jonathan Kim; Nathan J Palpant; Jay Gantz; Kara White Moyes; Hans Reinecke; Benjamin Van Biber; Todd Dardas; John L Mignone; Atsushi Izawa; Ramy Hanna; Mohan Viswanathan; Joseph D Gold; Michael I Kotlikoff; Narine Sarvazyan; Matthew W Kay; Charles E Murry; Michael A Laflamme Journal: Nature Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: I M Carvalho; P B Coelho; P C Costa; C S Marques; R S Oliveira; D C Ferreira Journal: Neuromolecular Med Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: LouJin Song; Daniel W Awari; Elizabeth Y Han; Eugenia Uche-Anya; Seon-Hye E Park; Yoko A Yabe; Wendy K Chung; Masayuki Yazawa Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 6.940