Marie-Rose B S Crombag1,2, Jacobine G C van Doremalen1,3, Julie M Janssen1,2, Hilde Rosing1, Jan H M Schellens2,3,4, Jos H Beijnen1,2,3, Neeltje Steeghs2,4, Alwin D R Huitema1,2,5. 1. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and MC Slotervaart, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Division of Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIM: Pharmacokinetics of small molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) used in cancer treatment may alter with increasing age, but results are conflicting. This study aims to compare exposure to KIs between older and younger patients (≥70 and <70 years) in clinical practice. METHODS: KI plasma concentrations of routinely treated patients were measured using validated assays. Calculated trough concentrations were compared in both age groups. For KIs with a clinically meaningful target concentration (erlotinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and vemurafenib), influence of older age on target attainment was assessed. RESULTS: We analysed 616 samples from 454 patients (median age: 61; range 20-93 years), treated with dabrafenib (n = 105), erlotinib (n = 49), imatinib (n = 165), pazopanib (n = 63), sunitinib (n = 87), trametinib (n = 95) and vemurafenib (n = 52). Older age did not significantly influence exposure to erlotinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, trametinib and vemurafenib. Elderly patients had significantly higher dabrafenib trough concentrations than younger patients (P = 0.02; 62 ng ml-1 (coefficient of variation [CV] 41%), vs. 53 ng ml-1 (CV 46%), respectively). For KIs with a predefined target concentration, 68% of older and 61% of younger patients reached target. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, exposure to most included KIs was comparable in older and younger patients, except for dabrafenib, which showed higher exposure in older patients. In the absence of an absolute target for this KI, clinical relevance remains unclear. For all other included KIs, our data suggest no clinically relevant influence of older age on KI exposure.
AIM: Pharmacokinetics of small molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) used in cancer treatment may alter with increasing age, but results are conflicting. This study aims to compare exposure to KIs between older and younger patients (≥70 and <70 years) in clinical practice. METHODS: KI plasma concentrations of routinely treated patients were measured using validated assays. Calculated trough concentrations were compared in both age groups. For KIs with a clinically meaningful target concentration (erlotinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and vemurafenib), influence of older age on target attainment was assessed. RESULTS: We analysed 616 samples from 454 patients (median age: 61; range 20-93 years), treated with dabrafenib (n = 105), erlotinib (n = 49), imatinib (n = 165), pazopanib (n = 63), sunitinib (n = 87), trametinib (n = 95) and vemurafenib (n = 52). Older age did not significantly influence exposure to erlotinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, trametinib and vemurafenib. Elderly patients had significantly higher dabrafenib trough concentrations than younger patients (P = 0.02; 62 ng ml-1 (coefficient of variation [CV] 41%), vs. 53 ng ml-1 (CV 46%), respectively). For KIs with a predefined target concentration, 68% of older and 61% of younger patients reached target. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, exposure to most included KIs was comparable in older and younger patients, except for dabrafenib, which showed higher exposure in older patients. In the absence of an absolute target for this KI, clinical relevance remains unclear. For all other included KIs, our data suggest no clinically relevant influence of older age on KI exposure.
Authors: N Widmer; L A Decosterd; C Csajka; S Leyvraz; M A Duchosal; A Rosselet; B Rochat; C B Eap; H Henry; J Biollaz; T Buclin Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Jacobine G C van Doremalen; Julie M Janssen; Hilde Rosing; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Huixin Yu; Neeltje Steeghs; Cynthia M Nijenhuis; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Remy B Verheijen; Sander Bins; Ron H J Mathijssen; Martijn P Lolkema; Leni van Doorn; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Marlies H G Langenberg; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Huixin Yu; Nielka van Erp; Sander Bins; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: R B Verheijen; L E Swart; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens; A D R Huitema; N Steeghs Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Jacobine G C van Doremalen; Julie M Janssen; Hilde Rosing; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Lauriane Goldwirt; B Louveau; C Lebbé; S Mourah; B Baroudjian; C Allayous; F Jouenne; L Da Meda; L-T Vu; H Sauvageon; F Herms; J Delyon Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.333