Literature DB >> 24831652

Erlotinib: another candidate for the therapeutic drug monitoring of targeted therapy of cancer? A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic systematic review of literature.

Emilie Petit-Jean1, Thierry Buclin, Monia Guidi, Elisabeth Quoix, Bénédicte Gourieux, Laurent A Decosterd, Anne-Cécile Gairard-Dory, Geneviève Ubeaud-Séquier, Nicolas Widmer.   

Abstract

Erlotinib is currently marketed at fixed standard dosage against pancreatic cancer and non-small-cell lung carcinoma. However, erlotinib pharmacokinetics (PK) is characterized by significant variability that may affect efficacy and tolerability. The aim of this review is to assess evidence that would justify therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and provide key information for the interpretation of erlotinib plasma concentrations. Literature was systematically reviewed to evaluate the standard criteria defining the potential clinical usefulness of TDM. Assessment was focused on the existence of unpredictable and wide PK variability and of consistent PK-pharmacodynamic relationships. PK parameters actually show marked variability (apparent clearance estimated to 4.85 ± 4.71 L/h, elimination half-life to 21.86 ± 28.35 hours, and apparent volume of distribution to 208 ± 133 L). Many covariates influence these parameters (CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors, food, age, liver impairment), but most sources of variability still have to be identified. Some studies have demonstrated a relationship between exposure to erlotinib and clinical outcomes or skin toxicity. Erlotinib activity and target concentrations furthermore depend on tumor characteristics (eg, mutations on epidermal growth factor receptor and on K-ras). These results are in favor of TDM in addition to treatment adjustment for tumor biomarkers, but prospective clinical trials validating its clinical benefits are lacking. This review provides all the relevant information available to assist clinical interpretation of erlotinib plasma measurements. PK percentile curves and consideration to covariates yield information on whether a concentration measured is expected, whereas half maximal inhibitory concentration values determined in vitro provide preliminary insights on target concentration values to reach. Eventually, dosage adaptation might be considered in patients with intolerable toxicity because of excessive plasma levels or conversely nonresponse imputable to insufficient exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24831652     DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  9 in total

1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of small molecule kinase inhibitors in oncology in a real-world cohort study: does age matter?

Authors:  Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Jacobine G C van Doremalen; Julie M Janssen; Hilde Rosing; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420 in infants and children with primary brain tumors.

Authors:  Samuel J Reddick; Olivia Campagne; Jie Huang; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Alberto Broniscer; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Vemurafenib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with efficacy and safety in outpatients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Authors:  N Kramkimel; A Thomas-Schoemann; L Sakji; Jl Golmard; G Noe; E Regnier-Rosencher; N Chapuis; E Maubec; M Vidal; Mf Avril; F Goldwasser; L Mortier; N Dupin; B Blanchet
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 4.  Germline oncopharmacogenetics, a promising field in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Pesenti; Milena Gusella; Silvia M Sirchia; Monica Miozzo
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.730

5.  Preclinical assessment of the interactions between the antiretroviral drugs, ritonavir and efavirenz, and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib.

Authors:  John F Deeken; Jan H Beumer; Nicole M Anders; Teresia Wanjiku; Milan Rusnak; Michelle A Rudek
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Phase Ib trial combining capecitabine, erlotinib and bevacizumab in pancreatic adenocarcinoma - REBECA trial.

Authors:  Christian Dittrich; Robert Königsberg; Martina Mittlböck; Klaus Geissler; Azra Sahmanovic-Hrgovcic; Johannes Pleiner-Duxneuner; Martin Czejka; Philipp Buchner
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 7.  Review of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors administration to non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  Chou-Chin Lan; Po-Chun Hsieh; Chun-Yao Huang; Mei-Chen Yang; Wen-Lin Su; Chih-Wei Wu; Yao-Kuang Wu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

8.  Developing an Agent-Based Drug Model to Investigate the Synergistic Effects of Drug Combinations.

Authors:  Hongjie Gao; Zuojing Yin; Zhiwei Cao; Le Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  The Steps to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Structured Approach Illustrated With Imatinib.

Authors:  Thierry Buclin; Yann Thoma; Nicolas Widmer; Pascal André; Monia Guidi; Chantal Csajka; Laurent A Decosterd
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.