Arti Hurria1, Stuart M Lichtman. 1. Cancer and Aging Research Program, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA. ahurria@coh.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of individuals aged 65 years and older is growing rapidly, and the majority of cancers are diagnosed in this age group. Age-related changes in physiology can affect chemotherapy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older patients. METHODS: We review the literature regarding the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of commonly used chemotherapy drugs and discuss age-related changes in physiology and pharmacology that can affect chemotherapy tolerance in older patients. RESULTS: The data on age-related changes in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics are conflicting. While a few studies report age-related differences in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics, most found no significant difference or subtle differences in pharmacokinetics with aging. A difference in pharmacodynamics was commonly seen, however, with older patients at increased risk of myelosuppression and toxicity from age-related decline in organ function. The majority of these studies were performed in a small cohort of patients, thus limiting the generalizability of these results. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies are needed to address the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer therapies in the older patient. Multicenter pharmacokinetic studies of adequate sample size, which include a thorough evaluation of physiologic factors and geriatric assessment parameters, would provide further insight into the factors affecting treatment tolerance. These studies would also help to guide appropriate chemotherapy dosing and interventions in order to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity in the older patient.
BACKGROUND: The number of individuals aged 65 years and older is growing rapidly, and the majority of cancers are diagnosed in this age group. Age-related changes in physiology can affect chemotherapy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older patients. METHODS: We review the literature regarding the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of commonly used chemotherapy drugs and discuss age-related changes in physiology and pharmacology that can affect chemotherapy tolerance in older patients. RESULTS: The data on age-related changes in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics are conflicting. While a few studies report age-related differences in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics, most found no significant difference or subtle differences in pharmacokinetics with aging. A difference in pharmacodynamics was commonly seen, however, with older patients at increased risk of myelosuppression and toxicity from age-related decline in organ function. The majority of these studies were performed in a small cohort of patients, thus limiting the generalizability of these results. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies are needed to address the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer therapies in the older patient. Multicenter pharmacokinetic studies of adequate sample size, which include a thorough evaluation of physiologic factors and geriatric assessment parameters, would provide further insight into the factors affecting treatment tolerance. These studies would also help to guide appropriate chemotherapy dosing and interventions in order to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity in the older patient.
Authors: Arti Hurria; M Suzette Blanchard; Timothy W Synold; Joanne Mortimer; Cathie T Chung; Thehang Luu; Vani Katheria; Arnold J Rotter; Carol Wong; Anthony Choi; Tao Feng; Rupal Ramani; Caroline M Doan; Jaycen Brown; George Somlo Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-12-09
Authors: Magali Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand; Ana María Aldea-Perona; Carlos Boada-Fernández Del Campo; Almudena Areosa-Sastre; Consuelo Rodríguez-Jiménez; Marcelino García Sánchez-Colomer; Eduardo Fernández Quintana; Mercedes Plasencia-Nuñez; Paula Masiero-Aparicio; Candelaria Grillo-Grillo; Andrés Orellana-Mobilli; Mar García Sáiz; Carmen Duarte Diéguez; Mercedes Hornillos Calvo; Juan Antonio Avellana Zaragoza; Nicolás Martínez Velilla; Domingo de Guzmán Pérez Hernández; Mario Ruiz González; Encarnación Blanco Reina; Carmen Asensio Ostos; Ana Peiró; Lourdes Cabrera García; Fuensanta Hortigüela Moro; Herlinda Pérez Alayón; Iriana Espárrago García; Javier Santana Quilez; Javier Alonso Ramírez; Carlos Fernández Oropesa; Mª José López Varona; Mª Teresa Acín Gerico; Emilio Sanz Alvarez; María Ángeles Martín de la Sierra; María José Peñalver; Teresa Falomir Gómez; Jesús Ruiz Salazar; Gabriela Elizondo Rivas; Edmundo Rey Rodríguez Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Jacobine G C van Doremalen; Julie M Janssen; Hilde Rosing; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kathelijn Sophie Versteeg; Susanne Blauwhoff-Buskermolen; Laurien M Buffart; Marian A E de van der Schueren; Jacqueline A E Langius; Henk M W Verheul; Andrea B Maier; Inge R Konings Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-12-08
Authors: Terri S Armstrong; Yumei Cao; Michael E Scheurer; Elizabeth Vera-Bolaños; Rochelle Manning; Mehmet F Okcu; Melissa Bondy; Renke Zhou; Mark R Gilbert Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Marie-Rose B S Crombag; Aurelia H M de Vries Schultink; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.923