| Literature DB >> 30065932 |
A Y M Nevame1, R M Emon2, M A Malek2, M M Hasan2,3, Md Amirul Alam4, Farrah Melissa Muharam5, Farzad Aslani6, M Y Rafii3,6, M R Ismail3.
Abstract
Occurrence of chalkiness in rice is attributed to genetic and environmental factors, especially high temperature (HT). The HT induces heat stress, which in turn compromises many grain qualities, especially transparency. Chalkiness in rice is commonly studied together with other quality traits such as amylose content, gel consistency, and protein storage. In addition to the fundamental QTLs, some other QTLs have been identified which accelerate chalkiness occurrence under HT condition. In this review, some of the relatively stable chalkiness, amylose content, and gel consistency related QTLs have been presented well. Genetically, HT effect on chalkiness is explained by the location of certain chalkiness gene in the vicinity of high-temperature-responsive genes. With regard to stable QTL distribution and availability of potential material resources, there is still feasibility to find out novel stable QTLs related to chalkiness under HT condition. A better understanding of those achievements is essential to develop new rice varieties with a reduced chalky grain percentage. Therefore, we propose the pyramiding of relatively stable and nonallelic QTLs controlling low chalkiness endosperm into adaptable rice varieties as pragmatic approach to mitigate HT effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065932 PMCID: PMC6051336 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1653721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Principal environmental causal factors and the mechanism pathways of the chalkiness formation in rice. Up arrows designate upregulation of the starch synthase genes and down arrows designate downregulation of synthase starch genes. Yellow box constituted the causal factor of the chalkiness formation, the purple boxes are the major physiological processes involved in endosperm formation, the light blue represents the regulatory pathways resulting in chalkiness formation, and red box is chalkiness formation. Source: Chen et al. [25].
Some major effect and relatively stable QTLs associated with chalkiness trait in rice.
| Type of chalkiness | QTLs | Chrx | Associated markers | Physical map position (Mb) | Parents | Population type | LOD | Add effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chalkiness |
| 1 | RM7124 | 24.38 | Sasanishiki/Habataki | ILs | 4.965 | 0.22 | Bian et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness |
| 1 | RM7600 | 39.16 | Sasanishiki/Habataki | ILs | 4.546 | 0.21 | Bian et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness |
| 2 | RM5699 | 8.98 | Sasanishiki/Habataki | ILs | 4.211 | 0.17 | Bian et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness |
| 11 | RM1341 | 20.80 | Sasanishiki/Habataki | ILs | 4.119 | 0.17 | Bian et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness |
| 4 | RM7585 | 0.21 | Sasanishiki/Habataki | ILs | 3.929 | 0.17 | Bian et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness |
| 9 | P414D03 | d | Sasanishiki/Habataki | ILs | 4.198 | 0.12 | Bian et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness |
| 5 | M413–RM169 | d | “N22”/“Nanjing35” | F2 | 2.75 | −10.37 | B. Y. Lu et al. (2013) |
| Chalkiness |
| 6 | R2869-R1952 | d | Kasalath/Koshihikari | CSSL | 8.13 | 14.77 | Zheng et al. (2012) |
| Chalkiness |
| 2 | C1419-C560 | d | Kasalath/Koshihikari | CSSL | 2.68 | 12.91 | Zheng et al. (2012) |
| Chalkiness |
| 3 | S879-S1513 | d | Kasalath/Koshihikari | CSSL | 3.01 | 8.14 | Zheng et al. (2012) |
| Chalkiness |
| 2 | RM145-RM3284 | 4.86–18.55 |
| ILs | 6.7 | −14.6 | P. R. Yuan et al. (2010) |
| Chalkiness |
| 7 | RM234 | 17.50 | PA64s/9311 | CSSL | 27.75 | 22.63 | Zhou et al. (2009) |
| Chalkiness |
| 8 | SA1656-RA2676 | d | Koshihikari/Nonabokra | CSSL | NA | −1.96 | Hao et al. (2009) |
| White-back |
| 3 | RM4512 | 11.28 | Hanaechizen/Niigatawase | RILs | 4.60 | 0.73 | Kobayashi et al. (2007) |
| White-back |
| 4 | RM3288 | 27.51 | Hanaechizen/Niigatawase | RILs | 4.36 | 0.53 | Kobayashi et al. (2007) |
| White-back |
| 6 | RM3034 | 42.57 | Hanaechizen/Niigatawase | RILs | 13.39 | 1.14 | Kobayashi et al. (2007) |
| White-back/basal-white |
| 5 | C10987-RM6645 | 12.99–15.00c | Koshihikari/Kasalath | NA | NA | NA | Ebitani et al. (2006) |
| White-back/basal-white |
| 5 | E10886-RM3476 | 20.13–23.82c | Koshihikari/Kasalath | NA | NA | NA | Ebitani et al. (2006) |
| Basal-white |
| 2 | RM3294 | 5.20 | Koshihikari/Kasalath | NA | 12.4 | 9.6 | Ebitani et al. (2005) |
| Basal-white |
| 12 | RM1208 | 1.07c | Koshihikari/Kasalath | NA | 4.1 | 7.1 | Ebitani et al. (2005) |
| Chalkiness |
| 8 | G1149-R727 | 19.17–26.23c | Asominori/IR24 | CSSLs | 5.2–7.3 | 21.8–33.7 | Wan et al. (2005) |
| Chalkiness |
| 9 | XNpb36-XNpb103 | 1.81–10.8c | Asominori/IR24 | CSSLs | 3.0–5.0 | 16.8–33.8 | Wan et al. (2005) |
| White-core |
| 12 | RZ397 | 5.76c | V20A/IRGC 103544 | BC3F1 | 3.8 | 9.87 | Li et al. (2004) |
| White-core |
| 3 | RM148 | 35.78c | V20A/IRGC 103544 | BC3F1 | 4.5 | 14.79 | Li et al. (2004) |
| Chalkiness |
| 1 | C161-R753 | 0.83c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 2.6 | 1.97 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| Chalkiness |
| 5 | RG360-C734 | 7.78c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 29.3 | 30.91 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| Chalkiness |
| 5 | RG528-C1447 | 27.86c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 5.8 | 13.74 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| Chalkiness |
| 6 | R1952-C226 | 2.90c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 2.5 | 8.24 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| Chalkiness |
| 10 | R2625-C223 | 21.78c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 2.5 | 8.57 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| White-belly |
| 5 | RG360-C734 | 10.65c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 35.2 | 72.9 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| White-belly |
| 7 | R1245-R1789 | 25.86c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 2.7 | 24.5 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| White-core |
| 5 | RG360-C734 | 14.26c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 4.5 | 12.2 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| White-core |
| 6 | Wx-R1952 | 1.77c | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3 | 4.0 | 9.8 | Tan et al. (2000) |
| Chalkiness |
| 4 | id4007289-id4008855 | 22.01–25.15 | Lemont/Teqing | RILs | NA | 2.8 | X. Zhao et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 4 | id4007289-id4008855 | 22.01–25.15 | Lemont/Teqing | RILs | NA | 9.2 | X. Zhao et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 4 | id4007289-id4008855 | 22.01–25.15 | Lemont/Teqing | RILs | NA | 11.1 | X. Zhao et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 7 | S07_22019132 | 3.51 | Using GWAS | 272 rice varieties | NA | −1.04 | X. Qiu et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 11 | D11_7124485 | 8.76 | Using GWAS | 272 rice varieties | NA | 0.12 | X. Qiu et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 2 | S02_30688426 | 8.86 | Using GWAS | 272 rice varieties | NA | 1.78 | X. Qiu et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 2 | D02_25652984 | 1.96 | Using GWAS | 272 rice varieties | NA | −4.75 | X. Qiu et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 1 | S01_5811836 | 8.66 | Using GWAS | 272 rice varieties | NA | 11.18 | X. Qiu et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 10 | 68923-PGC | NA | Zhenshan 97A/Minghui 63 | RILs | NA | NA | X. Liu et al. (2015) |
| Chalkiness |
| 8 | Bin 393 | 4.6–26.1 | Nipponbare/Zhenshan 97A | CSSL | NA | 0.045 | W. Sun et al. (2015) |
| White-belly rate |
| 1 | RM490-RM600 | 9.4 | Zhenshan 97A/Nanyangzhan | RILs | 3.3 | 12.61 | B. Peng et al. (2014) |
| White-belly rate |
| 8 | RM264-RM477 | 28.1 | Zhenshan 97A/Nanyangzhan | RILs | 3.0 | 11.05 | B. Peng et al. (2014) |
| White-belly rate |
| 12 | RM101-RM519 | 20 | Zhenshan 97A/Nanyangzhan | RILs | 3.6 | 14.55 | B. Peng et al. (2014) |
| Chalkiness rate |
| 5 | MRG5972-RM480 | 27.2 | Zhenshan 97A/DL208 | RILs | 3.2 | 10.5 | B. Peng et al. (2014) |
| White-core rate |
| 7 | RM445-RM418 | 18.1 | Zhenshan 97A/DL208 | RILs | 2.7 | −6.78 | B. Peng et al. (2014) |
x indicates chromosome in abbreviation; b indicates QTLs named tentatively by Yamakawa et al. (2008) in their report;c indicates physical map position calculated by Yamakawa et al. (2008) in their report; d indicates insufficiency of information to calculate physical map position for the related loci in this report; s indicates relatively stable QTLs detected throughout different growing conditions. NA: data is not available.
Certain content QTLs associated with amylose content trait in rice.
| QTLs | Chrx | Associated markers | Parents | Population type | LOD | Add effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4 | M13.4-M15.9z | 9311/Nipponbare | CSSLs | 4.93 | NA | Zhang et al. (2014) |
|
| 8 | M0.7-M1z | 9311/Nipponbare | CSSLs | 6.19 | NA | Zhang et al. (2014) |
|
| 8 | M8.7-M21.2z | 9311/Nipponbare | CSSLs | 5.59 | NA | Zhang et al. (2014) |
|
| 10 | M19.8-M20.5z | 9311/Nipponbare | CSSLs | 5.20 | NA | Zhang et al. (2014) |
|
| 8 | RM5911-SA1656 | Koshihikari/Nonabokra | CSSLs | NA | −0.05 | Hao et al. (2009) |
|
| 6 | RM314–RM3 | Swarna/IRGC81848 | BC2F2 | 2.60 | 0.86 | Swamy et al. (2012) |
|
| 6 | RA1952-RA2349 | Koshihikari/Nonabokra | CSSLs | NA | 5.19 | Hao et al. (2009) |
|
| 4 | R1854-RA0288 | Koshihikari/Nonabokra | CSSLs | NA | −0.02 | Hao et al. (2009) |
|
| 8 | G1149–R727 | Asominori and IR25 | CSSLs | 3.70 | 1.00 | X. Y. Wan et al. (2004) |
|
| 9 | XNpb36–XNpb103 | Asominori and IR26 | CSSLs | 2.50 | 1.40 | X. Y. Wan et al. (2004) |
|
| 9 | C609–C506 | Asominori and IR27 | CSSLs | 3.00 | 0.80 | X. Y. Wan et al. (2004) |
|
| 12 | XNpb189-2–XNpb24-2 | Asominori and IR28 | CSSLs | 2.30 | 0.80 | X. Y. Wan (2004) |
|
| 8 | RM230–RM264 | Caiapo/IRGC 103544 | DHs | 3.10 | −1.85 | G. Aluko (2004) |
|
| 6 | RM190–RM253 | Caiapo/IRGC 103544 | DHs | 19.30 | −2.60 | G. Aluko (2004) |
|
| 3 | RM7–RM251 | Caiapo/IRGC 103544 | DHs | 3.70 | −2.73 | G. Aluko (2004) |
|
| 6 | R2869-R1962 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 35.60 | −5.28 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 6 | R2869-R1962 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 43.50 | −4.40 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 3 | R1927-R3226 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 2.50 | 0.71 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 4 | C1100-R1783 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 3.20 | −0.90 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 5 | C624-C128 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 2.80 | −0.92 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 6 | RM170 | IR64/IRGC105491 | BC2F2 | 14.63 | −0.88 | E. M. Septiningsih et al. (2003) |
|
| 7 | RG375/RG477 | IR64/Azucena | DHs | 2.61 | 0.76 | J. S. Bao et al. (2002) |
|
| 6 | R565(F2:3); C952-C1496(RILs)g | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3; RILs | 69.00 | NA | Y. F. Tan et al. (1999) |
|
| 5 | RG573-C624 | ZYQ8/JX17 | DHs | 2.67 | −3.32 | P. He et al. (1999) |
|
| 6 |
| ZYQ8/JX17 | DHs | 28.39 | −8.52 | P. He et al. (1999) |
x indicates chromosome in abbreviation; f indicates amylose content QTL named tentatively in this report; g indicates the associated markers reported based on type of population used; z indicates associated markers tentatively named in this report based on the physical map position of the related QTLs. NA: data is not available; HT: QTL detected for amylose content in response to high temperature.
Certain QTLs associated with gel consistency trait detected in rice.
| QTLs | Chrx | Associated markers | Parents | Population ype | LOD | Add effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | RM499–RM428 | Swarna/IRGC81848 | BC2F2 | 3.90 | 5.67 | Swamy et al. (2012) |
|
| 1 | RM580–RM81 | Swarna/IRGC81848 | BC2F2 | 3.20 | 6.45 | Swamy et al. (2012) |
|
| 11 | RM209–RM21 | Swarna/IRGC81848 | BC2F2 | 2.90 | 4.25 | Swamy et al. (2012) |
|
| 1 | C122-R886 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 3.00 | 5.34 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 2 | R712-G227 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 4.00 | 6.11 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 2 | G1314B-G132 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 2.20 | 4.47 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 6 | L688-G200 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 4.60 | −7.65 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 6 | C556-R2071 | Nipponbare/Kasalath | BILs | 2.50 | −4.99 | Li et al. (2003) |
|
| 6 | RM50 | IR64/IRGC 105491 | BC2F2 | 4.02 | 3.57 | Septiningsih et al. (2003) |
|
| 1 | RG331/RG810 | IR64/Azucena | DHs | 2.71 | −3.70 | Bao et al. (2002) |
|
| 7 | RG477/PGMSO.7 | IR64/Azucena | DHs | 3.54 | −4.65 | Bao et al. (2002) |
|
| 6 | R565(F2:3); C952-C1496(RILs)g | Zhenshan 97/Minghui 63 | F2:3; RILs | 57.00 | NA | Tan et al. (1999) |
|
| 2 | RG171-G243A | ZYQ8/JX17 | DHs | 4.14 | 17.60 | He et al. (1999) |
|
| 7 | TCT122-RG769 | ZYQ8/JX17 | DHs | 3.26 | 17.00 | He et al. (1999) |
x indicates chromosome in abbreviation; f indicates gel consistency QTL named tentatively in this report; g indicates the associated markers reported based on type of population used. NA: data is not available.
Certain white-back chalkiness related QTLs detected under heat stress condition in rice.
| QTLs | Chrx | Associated markers | Physical map position (Mb) | Parentsd | Heat treatment condition | Population type | LOD | Add effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | RM7075 | 15.10 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 4.02 | –3.82 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 8 | RM72 | 18.75 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 4.34 | –1.44 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 2 | RM5470 | 27.17 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 2.93 | –1.17 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 6 | RM20429 | 25.04 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 2.78 | 1.40 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 12 | RM1986 | 21.28 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 3.35 | 1.60 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 3 | RM4853 | 1.37 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 8.90 | –8.39 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 8 | RM3689 | 19.33 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 2.21 | –4.45 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 3 | RM4853 | 1.37 | Tsukushiroman/Chikushi 52 | >27°C (irrigated with hot water, 35°C) | RILs | 4.59 | –1.41 | Takuya et al. (2015) |
|
| 3 | RM4383 | 14.72 | Niigatawase/Hanaechizen | >27°C | RILs | 5.18 | −3.11 | Kobayashi et al. (2007, 2013) |
|
| 4 | RM3288 | 27.51 | Niigatawase/Hanaechizen | >27°C | RILs | 4.30 | −2.42 | Kobayashi et al. (2007, 2013) |
|
| 6 | RM8125 | 3.16 | Niigatawase/Hanaechizen | >27°C | RILs | 18.11 | −5.40 | Kobayashi et al. (2007, 2013) |
|
| 9 | RM2482 | 22.27 | Niigatawase/Hanaechizen | >27°C | RILs | 7.63 | 4.35 | Kobayashi et al. (2007, 2013) |
|
| 6 | RM3034 | 4.25 | Niigatawase/Hanaechizen | >27°C | RILs | 7.80 | 0.19 | Kobayashi et al. (2007, 2013) |
|
| 1 | RM8068 | 1.65 | Chiyonishiki/Koshijiwase | 25–27°C at night/30–32°C at daylight | RILs | 3.4 | 8.9 | Tabata et al. (2007) |
|
| 1 | RM5501 | 34.54 | Chiyonishiki/Koshijiwase | 25–27°C at night/30–32°C at daylight | RILs | 5.6 | 15.0 | Tabata et al. (2007) |
|
| 2 | RM5916 | 34.08 | Chiyonishiki/Koshijiwase | 25–27°C at night/30–32°C at daylight | RILs | 3.8 | 9.3 | Tabata et al. (2007) |
|
| 8 | RM2680 | 0.14 | Chiyonishiki/Koshijiwase | 25–27°C at night/30–32°C at daylight | RILs | 3.6 | 9.2 | Tabata et al. (2007) |
|
| 1 | S13781 | 35.11c | Kokoromachi/Tohoku 168 | NA | NA | 4.3 | 4.6 | Shirasawa et al. (2006) |
|
| 6 | WxCT | 1.77c | Tohoku 168/Kokoromachi | NA | NA | 8.6 | 5.6 | Shirasawa et al. (2006) |
x indicates chromosome in abbreviation; b indicates QTLs named tentatively by Yamakawa et al. (2008) in their report;c indicates physical map position calculated by Yamakawa et al. (2008) in their report; d indicates parent with decreasing chalky grain percentage allele. NA: data is not available.
Figure 2Heat stress affects HS responsive and starch-metabolizing genes. HS: heat shock. Arrows in bold indicate the mechanism pathways described by Yamakawa et al. [26, 27]. Dashed arrows are unclear regulation pathways or genetic interaction, which may be responsible for the chalkiness formation. Sample arrows represent HS effects transduction that leads to expression of HS protein genes expression [28]. ROS: reactive oxygen species.
Figure 3Distribution and evolution of relatively stable QTLs related to chalkiness, amylose content, gel consistency, and high temperature-induced chalkiness QTLs. (a) Distribution of stable quality related QTLs over the 12 rice chromosomes. (b) Evolution of some of the relatively stable QTLs reported in rice. (c) Proportion of each of quality trait related QTLs as compared with the total 4 rice quality related QTLs studied (diagram showing the percentage of each type of QTLs among the 4 stable grain quality QTLs studied).
Figure 4Proposed approach for mitigating heat stress damage in plant. (1) Oxidative stresses from higher temperature. (2) Reactive oxygen species production. (3) Heat stress signal transduction in the plant and change in metabolic activity and genes expression. (4) Plant response to heat stress. (5) Heat stress tolerance via the natural metabolic defense. (6) Defect in HS tolerance and chalkiness formation. Heat stress tolerance via heat tolerance genes pyramiding. Stress tolerance and less chalky grain formation. Heat stress effect on plant fertility and yield reduction. Heat stress on plant water content. Water lost and grain filling rate (GFR) reduction. Effect of GFR on grain yield. Effect of GFR on chalkiness formation in rice. Yellow lines indicated detrimental effect of HS on the rice plant with weak tolerance. Green lines showed tolerance for the HS from strengthened metabolic defense. Black lines indicate the detrimental action of ROS and transcriptional responsiveness of the plant.