Literature DB >> 30061468

Downgraded phenomenology: how conscious overflow lost its richness.

Emily J Ward1.   

Abstract

Our in-the-moment experience of the world can feel vivid and rich, even when we cannot describe our experience due to limitations of attention, memory or other cognitive processes. But the nature of visual awareness is quite sparse, as suggested by the phenomena of failures of awareness, such as change blindness and inattentional blindness. I will argue that once failures of memory or failures of comparison are ruled out as explanations for these phenomena, they present strong evidence against rich awareness. To accommodate and explain these massive failures of awareness, any theory of phenomenal consciousness must downgrade phenomenology to a degree where it is functionless or, ironically, does not reflect what we experience.This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  change blindness; inattentional blindness; phenomenology; visual awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30061468      PMCID: PMC6074092          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  26 in total

1.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

3.  Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations.

Authors:  Vincent de Gardelle; Jérôme Sackur; Sid Kouider
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-04-14

Review 4.  Phenomenal and access consciousness in olfaction.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07

5.  Rich conscious perception outside focal attention.

Authors:  Ned Block
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Failure to detect meaning in RSVP at 27 ms per picture.

Authors:  John F Maguire; Piers D L Howe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?

Authors:  G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

Review 8.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Understanding human perception by human-made illusions.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Subjective inflation: phenomenology's get-rich-quick scheme.

Authors:  J D Knotts; Brian Odegaard; Hakwan Lau; David Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-14

2.  Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access: an introduction.

Authors:  Peter Fazekas; Morten Overgaard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Defending subjective inflation: an inference to the best explanation.

Authors:  J D Knotts; Matthias Michel; Brian Odegaard
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2020-12-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.