Literature DB >> 30060086

Influence of yeast culture and feed antibiotics on ruminal fermentation and site and extent of digestion in beef heifers fed high grain rations1.

Yizhao Shen1,2, Hongrong Wang1, Tao Ran2,3, Ilkyu Yoon4, Atef Mohamed Saleem2,5, Wenzhu Yang2.   

Abstract

The study objective was to investigate the effects of site of delivering Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (SCFP) on ruminal pH and fermentation characteristics, and the site and extent of feed digestion in the digestive tract of beef heifers fed high-grain diets. Examining the ruminal and postruminal effects of SCFP is important for understanding the potential use of SCFP as an alternative for current industry-standard antibiotics used in beef cattle rations. Five beef heifers (initial BW = 561 ± 11.7 kg) equipped with ruminal and duodenal cannulas were used in a 5 × 5 Latin square design with 28-d periods, including 21 d for adaption and 7 d for data collection. Five treatments were as follows: 1) control diet that contained 10% barley silage and 90% barley concentrate mix (DM basis); 2) control diet supplemented with antibiotics (ANT; 330-mg monensin/d and 110-mg tylosin/d per head); 3) ruminal (top dress) delivery of SCFP (rSCFP; NaturSafe, Diamond V, 18-g SCFP/d); 4) duodenal delivery of SCFP (dSCFP; 18-g SCFP/d, via duodenal cannula); and 5) a combination of rSCFP and dSCFP (rdSCFP; 18-g rSCFP and 18-g dSCFP). Intake of DM tended (P < 0.10) to be greater by heifers fed rdSCFP than those fed control, ANT and rSCFP diets. Minimum ruminal pH was greater (P < 0.05) with rSCFP than control and rdSCFP treatments. The duration of ruminal pH < 5.6 tended (P < 0.10) to be less with rSCFP than control and ANT. Heifers fed the rSCFP diet had greater (P < 0.03) protozoa counts and proportion of acetate than the other treatments. Nutrient flows to the duodenum did not differ (P > 0.19), whereas the amount of truly fermented OM was greater (P < 0.03) with rdSCFP than the other treatments. Ruminal OM digestibility was highest with rSCFP and rdSCFP, intermediate with dSCFP and ANT, and lowest with control (P < 0.03). Intestinal digestibility was similar among treatments. As a result, total tract digestibility of OM (P < 0.07) and NDF (P < 0.01) was greater with rSCFP and rdSCFP than control and ANT. Fecal IgA concentration was highest with ANT, intermediate with dSCFP and rdSCFP, and lowest with control and rSCFP (P < 0.03). These results demonstrate that feeding SCFP improved stability of ruminal pH and digestibility of OM and NDF. Delivery of SCFP to the duodenum appeared to have little effect on nutrient digestibility but improved intestinal immune response. Feeding SCFP performed better or at least equal to antibiotics currently used in beef cattle rations and could be a natural alternative for beef cattle production. © Crown copyright 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product; antibiotics; beef heifers; rumen pH and fermentation; site and extent of digestion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30060086      PMCID: PMC6127774          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  29 in total

1.  Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws.

Authors:  S X Tang; G O Tayo; Z L Tan; Z H Sun; L X Shen; C S Zhou; W J Xiao; G P Ren; X F Han; S B Shen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of increasing levels of corn dried distillers grains with solubles and monensin on intake, digestion, and ruminal fermentation in beef heifers fed high-barley grain diets.

Authors:  L Xu; Y Jin; M L He; C Li; T A McAllister; W Z Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Applying technology with newer feed ingredients in feedlot diets: do the old paradigms apply?

Authors:  N DiLorenzo; M L Galyean
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Impact of hard vs. soft wheat and monensin level on rumen acidosis in feedlot heifers.

Authors:  W Z Yang; L Xu; Y L Zhao; L Y Chen; T A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product as an alternative to monensin on growth performance, cost of gain, and carcass characteristics of heavy-weight yearling beef steers.

Authors:  K L Swyers; J J Wagner; K L Dorton; S L Archibeque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effect of monensin on the performance and nitrogen utilization of lactating dairy cows consuming fresh forage.

Authors:  R Ruiz; G L Albrecht; L O Tedeschi; G Jarvis; J B Russell; D G Fox
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation.

Authors:  L M Rode; W Z Yang; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on dairy calves: Ruminal fermentation, gastrointestinal morphology, and microbial community.

Authors:  J X Xiao; G M Alugongo; R Chung; S Z Dong; S L Li; I Yoon; Z H Wu; Z J Cao
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on in vitro fermentation and microbial communities of low-quality forages and mixed diets.

Authors:  Hui-ling Mao; Hua-long Mao; J K Wang; J X Liu; I Yoon
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences.

Authors:  J C Plaizier; D O Krause; G N Gozho; B W McBride
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.688

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ruminally protected and unprotected Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers1.

Authors:  Yizhao Shen; Taylor Davedow; Tao Ran; Atef M Saleem; Ilkyu Yoon; Claudia Narvaez; Tim Angus Mcallister; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Peixin Jiao; Ousama AlZahal; Xiaolai Xie; Karen A Beauchemin; Dongyan Niu; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Evaluation of different inclusion levels of dry live yeast impacts on various rumen parameters and in situ digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber in growing and finishing beef cattle.

Authors:  Caitlyn M Cagle; Luiz Fernando D Batista; Robin C Anderson; Mozart A Fonseca; Maztt D Cravey; Christine Julien; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Rumen fermentative metabolomic and blood insights into the effect of yeast culture supplement on growing bulls under heat stress conditions.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Huan Liang; Lanjiao Xu; Bicheng Zou; Tingzhou Zhang; Fuguang Xue; Mingren Qu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.