| Literature DB >> 36147855 |
Xian Zhang1, Huan Liang1, Lanjiao Xu1, Bicheng Zou1, Tingzhou Zhang2, Fuguang Xue1,3, Mingren Qu1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of yeast culture supplements on the physiological state and growth performance of growing bulls under heat stress conditions and the underlying mechanism. A total of 14 (6.0 ± 1.0 months old) growing bulls with similar body weight were randomly assigned into the control group (YC0g/d ) and yeast culture supplement group (YC40g/d ). YC0g/d contained three replicates, with two bulls in each replicate, which were fed a basal diet. Meanwhile, the YC40g/d treatment contained four replicates, with two bulls in each replicate, which were fed a basal diet supplemented with 40 g/day of yeast culture per cattle. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentable metabolites, serum immunity, serum hormones, and serum antioxidant parameters were measured. Results showed that the average daily gain significantly increased (P < 0.05), while the feed-to-gain ratio significantly decreased (P < 0.01) after YC supplementation compared with the YC0g/d . The digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (P < 0.05) was higher in YC40g/d . There were no significant differences in ruminal pH, NH3-N, butyrate, or acetate/propionate (P > 0.05). Besides, the rumen MCP, acetate, propionate, and total VFA content remarkably increased with the supplement of YC (P < 0.05). Yeast culture supplementation increased the concentration of nicotinamide riboside, neuromedin B, peptides, and formyl-5-hydroxykynurenamine. The YC40g/d group had a significantly (P < 0.05) higher serum triiodothyronine level, serum glutathione peroxidase levels, and total antioxidant capacity while having a lower serum malondialdehyde level than the YC0g/d group. In conclusion, the addition of yeast culture in the diet improves the growth performance of growing bulls under heat stress by increasing nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation function, antioxidant capacity, and rumen metabolites.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant variables; growing bulls; growth performance; heat stress; metabolomics; yeast culture
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147855 PMCID: PMC9486011 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.947822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1The average temperature, average relative humidity, and THI during the trial period.
Ingredients and nutrient levels of the experimental diets (dry matter basis).
| Ingredients, % | Content (%) | Nutrient levels | Content (%) |
| Corn | 31.00 | Dry matter | 72.35 |
| Soybean meal | 6.00 | Crude protein | 13.35 |
| straw | 34.00 | Ash | 8.40 |
| Baijiu fermented grains | 26.00 | Neutral detergent fiber | 43.15 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.80 | Acid detergent fiber | 21.91 |
| NaCl | 0.40 | Ca | 0.89 |
| Premix | 1.80 | P | 0.61 |
One kilogram of premix provided the following: vitamin A, 150,000 IU; vitamin D3, 20,000 IU; vitamin E, 3,000 IU; Fe 3, 750 mg; Mn 3, 200 mg; Zn, 2,000 mg; Cu, 600 mg; I, 20 mg; Se, 10 mg; Co, 10 mg; Ca, 130 g, P, 30 g.
Effect of feeding YC on growth and feed efficiency of growing bulls.
| Items | YC0 | YC40 | |
| ADFI (kg/d) | 3.58 ± 0.05 | 3.70 ± 0.06 | 0.241 |
| IBW (kg) | 112.8 ± 2.99 | 116.6 ± 3.86 | 0.368 |
| FBW (kg) | 151.9 ± 3.18 | 160.9 ± 3.73 | 0.141 |
| ADG (kg/d) | 0.566 ± 0.018b | 0.643 ± 0.019a | 0.035 |
| F:G | 6.33 ± 0.10a | 5.76 ± 0.07b | 0.006 |
The results are presented as the mean value ± SEM. Mean values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
SEM, standard error of the mean; YC, yeast culture; ADFI, average daily feed intake; IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; ADG, average daily gain; F:G, feed to gain ratio.
Effect of feeding YC on nutrient digestibility of growing bulls on days 30 and 62.
| Item | Time (d) | YC0 | YC40 | |||
| Time | YC | Time × YC | ||||
| DM % | 30 | 70.37 ± 1.12 | 70.83 ± 1.46 | 0.342 | 0.558 | 0.776 |
| 62 | 70.63 ± 1.04 | 71.47 ± 0.85 | ||||
| NDF % | 30 | 59.21 ± 1.70 | 63.68 ± 2.84 | 0.081 | 0.037 | 0.644 |
| 62 | 57.23 ± 2.17 | 61.24 ± 2.14 | ||||
| ADF % | 30 | 52.33 ± 0.87 | 52.83 ± 1.26 | 0.003 | 0.366 | 0.201 |
| 62 | 56.36 ± 1.64 | 54.67 ± 1.67 | ||||
| CP % | 30 | 64.80 ± 2.11 | 63.13 ± 4.83 | 0.101 | 0.189 | 0.514 |
| 62 | 59.96 ± 2.25 | 63.73 ± 0.52 | ||||
| CF % | 30 | 79.51 ± 3.14 | 82.40 ± 2.87 | 0.169 | 0.558 | 0.404 |
| 62 | 77.87 ± 2.66 | 76.65 ± 3.77 | ||||
The results are presented as the mean values ± SEM.
SEM, standard error of mean; YC, yeast culture; DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; CP, crude protein; CF, crude fat.
Effect of feeding YC on rumen fermentation of growing bulls.
| Item | YC0 | YC40 | |
| Ruminal pH | 6.28 ± 0.03 | 6.30 ± 0.02 | 0.658 |
| MCP (mg/dL) | 69.09 ± 2.11a | 76.27 ± 2.09b | 0.036 |
| NH3-N (mmol/dL) | 11.09 ± 1.20 | 12.94 ± 1.07 | 0.274 |
| Acetate (mmol/L) | 32.01 ± 1.19 | 38.50 ± 1.70 | 0.011 |
| Propionate (mmol/L) | 8.49 ± 0.68a | 11.50 ± 0.74b | 0.013 |
| Butyrate (mmol/L) | 4.45 ± 0.37 | 5.43 ± 0.40 | 0.103 |
| Acetate/propionate | 3.84 ± 0.19 | 3.42 ± 0.24 | 0.197 |
| Total VFA (mmol/L) | 46.73 ± 2.25a | 57.98 ± 1.92b | 0.004 |
The results are presented as the mean values ± SEM. Mean values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)
SEM, standard error of the mean; YC, yeast culture; MCP, microbial crude protein; NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; VFA, volatile fatty acid.
FIGURE 2(A) A PCA of ruminal metabolites from bulls (n = 6) fed a control diet (control) and bulls fed 40 g/day of YC; (B) an OPLS-DA of ruminal metabolites from bulls (n = 6) fed a control diet (control) and bulls fed 40 g/day of YC.
Different metabolite contents in the rumen of bulls fed a control diet (CON) vs. bulls fed 40 g/day of YC.
| Classification | Metabolites | FC (CON/YC) | VIP | |
| Amino acids and peptides metabolism | ACRL Toxin II | 0.983 | 1.258 | 0.012 |
| Atemoyacin B | 0.987 | 1.212 | 0.004 | |
| Neuromedin B | 0.744 | 4.889 | 0.000 | |
| Phenylalanyl-Lysine | 0.905 | 3.239 | 0.000 | |
| Glycyl-prolyl-hydroxyproline | 0.934 | 2.375 | 0.017 | |
| 2-{[hydroxy(1H-indol-3-yl)methylidene]amino}acetic acid | 0.980 | 1.400 | 0.005 | |
| (S)-2,3,4,5-Tetrahydropiperidine-2-carboxylate | 0.979 | 1.332 | 0.023 | |
| Gamma-Glutamyl-S-methylcysteine sulfoxide | 1.014 | 1.083 | 0.028 | |
| carbohydrates metabolism | Ferulic acid 4-sulfate | 1.247 | 4.044 | 0.006 |
| Nicotinamide riboside | 0.936 | 2.226 | 0.044 | |
| Formyl-5-hydroxykynurenamine | 0.912 | 2.644 | 0.014 | |
| Lipometabolic metabolites | Tributyrin | 0.799 | 4.237 | 0.001 |
| 3-Indolebutyric acid | 0.900 | 2.898 | 0.005 | |
| 6-Hydroxykynurenic acid | 1.105 | 2.903 | 0.014 | |
| Xanthurenic acid | 1.105 | 2.827 | 0.016 | |
| P-Salicylic acid | 1.064 | 2.733 | 0.000 | |
| Hypogeic acid | 0.963 | 1.829 | 0.019 | |
| Eriojaposide B | 1.067 | 2.272 | 0.028 | |
| Gamma-Tocotrienol | 0.945 | 2.400 | 0.004 | |
| (24R)-Ergost-4-ene-3,6-dione | 0.965 | 1.839 | 0.017 | |
| N-[(4E,8E)-1,3-dihydroxyoctadeca-4,8-dien-2-yl]hexadecanamide | 1.039 | 1.814 | 0.013 | |
| 11-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoate glyceryl ester | 0.988 | 1.078 | 0.021 | |
| (6beta,7alpha,12beta,13beta)-7-Hydroxy-11,16-dioxo-8,14-apianadien-22,6-olide | 1.058 | 2.075 | 0.026 | |
| Isofucosterol glucoside | 1.032 | 1.685 | 0.026 | |
| (20R)-Ginsenoside Rh2 | 1.034 | 1.641 | 0.034 | |
| 4,8 dimethylnonanoyl carnitine | 0.976 | 1.469 | 0.020 | |
| 2beta,9xi-Dihydroxy-8-oxo-1(10),4,11(13)-germacratrien-12,6alpha-olide | 0.973 | 1.585 | 0.025 | |
| 27-Norcholestanehexol | 0.988 | 1.119 | 0.004 | |
| Isoamberboin | 1.019 | 1.205 | 0.020 |
All different metabolites listed here are those VIP > 1 and P-value < 0.05.
FC, fold change.
FC values < 1 mean that metabolites are greater in YC and FC values > 1 mean that the metabolite is lower in YC.
FIGURE 3Analysis of the KEGG pathway enriched by differential metabolites in the rumen.
Effect of feeding YC on the immunological function, anti-stress, and antioxidant parameters in the serum on days 30 and 62.
| Item | Time (d) | YC0 | YC40 | |||
| Time | YC | Time × YC | ||||
| IgA, g/L | 30 | 2.00 ± 0.36 | 1.91 ± 0.30 | 0.392 | 0.096 | 0.582 |
| 62 | 2.32 ± 0.42 | 1.98 ± 0.16 | ||||
| IgG, g/L | 30 | 15.21 ± 2.65 | 15.29 ± 3.70 | 0.387 | 0.986 | 0.974 |
| 62 | 16.53 ± 2.92 | 16.51 ± 1.94 | ||||
| IgM, g/L | 30 | 1.39 ± 0.20 | 1.36 ± 0.21 | 0.127 | 0.909 | 0.857 |
| 62 | 1.56 ± 0.39 | 1.57 ± 0.15 | ||||
| IL-4, pg/ml | 30 | 7.40 ± 4.23 | 6.46 ± 1.86 | 0.490 | 0.778 | 0.476 |
| 62 | 7.35 ± 2.19 | 9.44 ± 6.01 | ||||
| IL-6, pg/ml | 30 | 122.3 ± 20.3 | 144.1 ± 29.7 | 0.064 | 0.172 | 0.287 |
| 62 | 100.4 ± 14.6 | 99.8 ± 19.8 | ||||
| TNF-α, pg/ml | 30 | 62.92 ± 10.07 | 50.18 ± 7.38 | 0.090 | 0.227 | 0.076 |
| 62 | 50.77 ± 5.23 | 47.75 ± 5.40 | ||||
| COR, ng/ml | 30 | 76.08 ± 9.15 | 75.73 ± 8.56 | 0.234 | 0.528 | 0.735 |
| 62 | 67.67 ± 20.76 | 61.13 ± 15.17 | ||||
| T3, ng/ml | 30 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 1.11 ± 0.19 | 0.136 | 0.064 | 0.229 |
| 62 | 0.89 ± 0.18 | 0.85 ± 0.13 | ||||
| T4, ng/ml | 30 | 53.90 ± 4.65 | 68.74 ± 9.04 | 0.245 | 0.015 | 0.738 |
| 62 | 52.15 ± 5.41 | 65.67 ± 5.99 | ||||
| SOD, U/L | 30 | 17.17 ± 2.8 | 17.06 ± 2.10 | 0.799 | 0.990 | 0.815 |
| 62 | 16.99 ± 2.96 | 17.05 ± 2.50 | ||||
| MDA, mmol/L | 30 | 4.34 ± 0.27 | 3.60 ± 0.49 | 0.005 | 0.017 | 0.324 |
| 62 | 4.77 ± 0.34 | 4.23 ± 0.09 | ||||
| GSH, U/L | 30 | 27.86 ± 6.66 | 41.20 ± 9.85 | 0.128 | 0.005 | 0.935 |
| 62 | 35.90 ± 5.56 | 48.50 ± 6.94 | ||||
| T-AOC, mmol/L | 30 | 2.82 ± 0.25 | 3.01 ± 0.40 | 0.297 | 0.045 | 0.211 |
| 62 | 2.45 ± 0.22 | 3.05 ± 0.31 | ||||
The result is presented as the mean values ± SEM.
SEM, standard error of mean; YC, yeast culture; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity.