Literature DB >> 30053559

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Spinal Canal Stenosis: Classification of Lateral Region of Lumbar Spinal Canal and Surgical Approaches.

Yu Wang1, Qingyu Dou2, Jin Yang1, Lifeng Zhang1, Yuqing Yan1, Zhiyu Peng1, Chuan Guo1, Qingquan Kong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to provide a new classification of the lateral region of the lumbar spinal canal (LLSC) and evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of LLSC stenosis guided by the classification.
METHODS: We developed a new functional classification of the LLSC by dividing the region into 5 zones. Thirty random lumbar imaging studies from patients with single-level LLSC stenosis in our department from January 2015 to June 2015 were evaluated by 3 examiners to validate its reliability. Subsequently, a prospective clinical outcome study of 76 patients with single-level LLSC stenosis from July 2015 to July 2016 with 2-year follow-up available was undertaken. All the patients had undergone either percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression with foraminoplasty or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar decompression, according to the classification. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using MacNab criteria, and pre- and postoperative leg pain were evaluated using the visual analog scale.
RESULTS: We observed a 93.3% agreement among examiners. The mean follow-up duration was 15.6 months (range, 3-24). We found good and excellent outcomes in 93.4% of the patients at the last follow-up examination. The mean preoperative visual analog scale score was 5.72 ± 1.18 (range, 4-9), which had decreased to 1.26 ± 0.81 (range, 0-3) at the third month postoperatively and to 0.78 ± 0.62 (range, 0-1) by the last follow-up visit. Dural tears appeared in 2 patients, and migrated bone had moved into the spinal canal after the surgery in 1 patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The new classification of LLSC can provide objective criteria for full-endoscopic surgery that could lead to better clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional classification; Lateral lumbar spinal canal; Lumbar spinal stenosis; PELD; Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30053559     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  10 in total

1.  Learning curve and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Chuan Guo; Qingquan Kong; Bin Zhang; Yu Wang; Lifeng Zhang; Hao Wu; Zhiyu Peng; Yuqing Yan; Dongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparative study between full-endoscopic laminectomy and microendoscopic laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroki Iwai; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

3.  [Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal unilateral decompression for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and observational study of non-surgical lower extremity symptoms].

Authors:  Ziquan Li; Keyi Yu; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

4.  Comparison Between Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Hengjie Zhu; Zheng Zhou; Jixiang Wu; Yinming Sun; Xiang Shen; Chengcun Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-10-09

5.  Short-term effectiveness of precise safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Mingyan Deng; Hao Wu; Ye Wu; Chuan Guo; Dongfeng Zhang; Qingquan Kong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  [Short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral decompression for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Qingquan Kong; Jing Yang; Pin Feng; Junsong Ma; Junlin Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-15

7.  [The application of classification of lateral region of lumbar spinal canal for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients using full endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery].

Authors:  Jin Yang; Yu Wang; Qingquan Kong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15

8.  Outcome of lumbar lateral recess stenosis with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in patients 65 years of age or older and in younger patients.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Li; Tao Liu; Junjun Fan; Hongtao Zhang; Chunbao Yang; Xin Yin; Haoran Gao; Jixian Qian; Siguo Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Comparison of Effects of PELD and Fenestration in the Treatment of Geriatric Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis.

Authors:  Zhendong Lv; Linyu Jin; Kun Wang; Zhi Chen; Fengning Li; Yuhui Zhang; Lifeng Lao; Chun Zhou; Xinfeng Li; Hongxing Shen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Qingquan Kong; Yuqing Yan; Pin Feng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.