Literature DB >> 33446166

Short-term effectiveness of precise safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.

Yu Wang1, Mingyan Deng2, Hao Wu1, Ye Wu1, Chuan Guo1, Dongfeng Zhang1, Qingquan Kong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective cohort study reports on a modified technique, namely precise safety decompression via double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty (DPLF) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) for lateral lumbar spinal canal (LLSC) stenosis, and its short-term clinical outcomes.
METHODS: The study analyzed 69 patients with single-level LLSC stenosis simultaneously occurring in both zones 1 and 2 (defined as retrodiscal space and upper bony lateral recess respectively by new LLSC classification) who underwent DPLF-PELD from November 2018 to April 2019. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to preoperative, 3 months postoperatively, and last follow-up, via leg pain/low back pain (LBP) visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and the Macnab criteria. The postoperative MRI and CT were used to confirm the complete decompression, and flexion-extension x-rays at the last follow-up were used to observe lumbar stability.
RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent DPLF-PELD, and the stenosis was completely decompressed, confirmed by postoperative MRI and CT. The mean follow-up duration was 13 months (range: 8-17 months). The mean preoperative leg pain VAS score is 7.05 ± 1.04 (range 5-9), which decreased to 1.03 ± 0.79(range: 0-3) at 3 months postoperatively and to 0.75 ± 0.63 (range: 0-2) by the last follow-up visit (p < 0.05). The mean preoperative ODI was 69.8 ± 9.05 (range: 52-85), which decreased to 20.3 ± 5.52 (range: 10-35) at the third month postoperatively and to 19.6 ± 5.21 (range: 10-34) by the final follow-up visit (p < 0.05). The satisfactory (excellent or good) results were 94.2%. There was one patient with aggravated symptoms, which were relieved after an open surgery. Two patients had a dural tear, and two patients suffered postoperative LBP. No recurrence or segmental instability was observed at the final follow-up.
CONCLUSION: DPLF-PELD could be a good alternative for the treatment of LLSC stenosis patients whose stenosis occurred in both zones 1 and 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR1800019551 ). Registered 18 November 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty; Lumbar lateral spinal canal; Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33446166      PMCID: PMC7807700          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03956-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  30 in total

1.  Arthroscopic microdiscectomy.

Authors:  P Kambin
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies.

Authors:  K Abumi; M M Panjabi; K M Kramer; J Duranceau; T Oxland; J J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yong Ahn
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 4.  Surgical and nonsurgical treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-25

5.  Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression.

Authors:  C K Lee; W Rauschning; W Glenn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients.

Authors:  I Macnab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  TO THE EDITOR.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qingquan Kong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniations in children.

Authors:  Changkun Zheng; Fei Wu; Lin Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

10.  Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Thomas Hoogland; Michael Schubert; Boris Miklitz; Agnes Ramirez
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xingping Xu; Changwei Chen; Yong Tang; Fusheng Wang; Yangsheng Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.682

2.  Associations between Patient Report of Pain and Intervertebral Foramina Changes Visible on Axial-Loaded Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tomasz Lorenc; Marek Gołębiowski; Dariusz Syganiec; Wojciech M Glinkowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.