Literature DB >> 31773186

Learning curve and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Jin Yang1,2, Chuan Guo1, Qingquan Kong3, Bin Zhang1, Yu Wang1, Lifeng Zhang1, Hao Wu1, Zhiyu Peng1, Yuqing Yan1, Dongfeng Zhang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define and analyze the learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression (PETD) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: From July 2015 to September 2016, 78 patients underwent PETD; one of whom was converted to open surgery, two were lost, and 75 were included in this study. Clinical results were assessed by using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS). The learning curve was assessed by a logarithmic curve-fitting regression analysis. Of these 75 patients, 35 were defined as the "early" group, and 40 were defined as the "late" group for comparison.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 25.37 ± 4.71 months. The median operative time gradually decreased from 95 (interquartile range, IQR, 85-110) minutes for the early group to 70 (IQR, 60-80) minutes for the late group (P < .000), and an asymptote was reached after approximately 35 cases. After surgery, the VAS for leg pain (LP) and ODI decreased significantly and remained constant during the follow-up. However, the VAS of low back pain (LBP) increased mildly. The total complication rate was 6.6%. ODI, VAS of LP and of LBP, and complication rate did not significantly differ between two groups. Early ambulation and short hospital stay after surgery were achieved.
CONCLUSION: The learning curve of PETD for LSS was assessed and good clinical results were achieved. The surgeon's experience with this technique correlated with reduced operation time. Proper patient selection, familiarity with pathological anatomy, and manipulation under endoscopic view may shorten the learning curve and decrease complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Non-fusion surgery; Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31773186     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04448-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  34 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review.

Authors:  C R Ramsay; A M Grant; S A Wallace; P H Garthwaite; A F Monk; I T Russell
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at L5-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope.

Authors:  Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee; Pradyumna Pai Raiturker; Seungcheol Lee; Yu-Sik Chae
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Molecular pathogenic factors in symptomatic disc degeneration.

Authors:  D Greg Anderson; Chadi Tannoury
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Hae-Dong Jang; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  An evaluation of the learning curve for a complex surgical technique: the full endoscopic interlaminar approach for lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Guohua Lü; Alpesh A Patel; Peigen Ren; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Yin-gang Zhang; Tuan-mao Guo; Xiong Guo; Shi-xun Wu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 9.  Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nickalus R Khan; Aaron J Clark; Siang Liao Lee; Garrett T Venable; Nicholas B Rossi; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Comparative Effectiveness and Economic Evaluations of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Frank M Phillips; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Learning Curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) Spinal Surgery by CUSUM Analysis.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Bin Zhu; Hua-Zhang Zhong; Yi-Guo Wang; Yi-Song Sun; Qi-Fei Wang; Jian-Jun Liu; Da-Sheng Tian; Jue-Hua Jing
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  Design of a robot-assisted system for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar surgeries: study protocol.

Authors:  Ning Fan; Shuo Yuan; Peng Du; Wenyi Zhu; Liang Li; Yong Hai; Hui Ding; Guangzhi Wang; Lei Zang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Physician-Related Variability in the Outcomes of an Invasive Treatment for Neck and Back Pain: A Multi-Level Analysis of Data Gathered in Routine Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ana Royuela; Francisco M Kovacs; Jesús Seco-Calvo; Borja M Fernández-Félix; Víctor Abraira; Javier Zamora
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy versus Traditional Open Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xingping Xu; Changwei Chen; Yong Tang; Fusheng Wang; Yangsheng Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Surgeons' Perspective, Learning Curve, Motivation, and Obstacles of Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Thailand: Results From A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Vit Kotheeranurak; Wongthawat Liawrungrueang; Verapan Kuansongtham; Pornpavit Sriphirom; Narongsak Bamrungthin; Gun Keorochana; Pritsanai Pruttikul; Worawat Limthongkul; Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Suthipas Pongmanee; Rattalerk Arunakul; Monchai Ruangchainikom; Phanunan Sasiprapha; Roongrath Chitragarn; Saran Pairuchvej; Teerachat Tanasansomboon; Khanathip Jitpakdee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  TELD with limited foraminoplasty has potential biomechanical advantages over TELD with large annuloplasty: an in-silico study.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Chen Xu; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhipeng Xi; Mengnan Liu; Zhongxin Fang; Nan Wang; Lin Xie; Yueming Song
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Kee-Won Rhyu; Hyung-Youl Park; Chang-Hee Cho; Hun-Chul Kim; Hyo-Jin Lee; Sang-Il Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-10-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.