Literature DB >> 31650756

[Short-term effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral decompression for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis].

Bin Zhang1, Qingquan Kong2, Jing Yang3, Pin Feng4, Junsong Ma4, Junlin Liu4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral decompression for severe central lumbar spinal stenosis.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 44 patients with single-segment severe central lumbar spinal stenosis with bilateral lower extremity symptoms between October 2015 and December 2017 was performed. Among them, 36 cases underwent bilateral decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach, and 8 cases underwent bilateral decompression through unilateral transforaminal approach. There were 25 males and 19 females, the age ranged from 56 to 89 years with an average of 68.6 years. The disease duration was 5-39 months with an average of 14.5 months. Involved segments: L 3, 4 in 6 cases, L 4, 5 in 33 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 5 cases. The dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) of the MRI was (66.36±8.48) mm 2. Morphological grading (MG) classification: 29 cases of grade C, 15 cases of grade D. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score of preoperative low back pain was 2.3±1.0 and the VAS score of lower extremity pain was 7.8±1.2; the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was 77.8±7.3. Postoperative VAS scores, ODI scores, MG classification, and DSCA were recorded and compared with preoperative ones, and clinical outcomes were assessed by using the modified MacNab criteria.
RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent surgery and the wounds healed by first intention. All 44 patients were followed up 13-46 months with an average of 24.8 months. One patient developed postoperative lower extremity paralysis and 1 patient developed a dural tear. There was no infection, recurrence, or revision surgery during the follow-up. Postoperative imaging showed that the central spinal canal was enlarged and the area of the dural sac was significantly increased compared with preoperative one. The VAS score of low back pain was 2.4±0.6 and 2.5±0.8 at 1 month after operation and at last follow-up, showing no significant difference when compared with preoperative scores ( P>0.05). The VAS of lower limb pain was 2.1±0.6 and 2.0±1.1 at 1 month after operation and at last follow-up, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05); but no significant difference was found between at 1 month after operation and at last follow-up ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the ODI score was 19.7±6.4, and the DSCA was (104.93±12.56) mm 2, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05). The MG classification was also significantly higher than preoperative one ( Z=-5.789, P=0.000). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the results were excellent in 32 cases, good in 9 cases, and fair in 3 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 93.2%.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal bilateral decompression for treating severe central lumbar spinal stenosis has the advantages of less trauma, adequate decompression, and rapid recovery. The short-term effectiveness is good.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar central spinal stenosis; percutaneous endoscopy; spinal decompression; transforaminal approach

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31650756      PMCID: PMC8337441          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  24 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic spine surgery for treatment of lumbar spine disorders with intraspinal ossification].

Authors:  Yin Liu; Peng Cai; Qingquan Kong; Yueming Song
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Assessment of Paraspinal Muscle Cross-sectional Area After Lumbar Decompression: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Approaches.

Authors:  Lacey E Bresnahan; Justin S Smith; Alfred T Ogden; Steven Quinn; George R Cybulski; Narina Simonian; Raghu N Natarajan; Richard D Fessler; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  [Short-term effectiveness of accurate decompression via foraminoplasty in treatment of lumbar lateral recess stenosis].

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qingquan Kong; Yueming Song
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2017-11-15

5.  MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?

Authors:  Greger Lønne; Bent Ødegård; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Tore K Solberg; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Øystein P Nygaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients.

Authors:  I Macnab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Jin Hwa Eum; Dong Hwa Heo; Sang Kyu Son; Choon Keun Park
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-01-01

8.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Spinal Canal Stenosis: Classification of Lateral Region of Lumbar Spinal Canal and Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qingyu Dou; Jin Yang; Lifeng Zhang; Yuqing Yan; Zhiyu Peng; Chuan Guo; Qingquan Kong
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Assessment: use of epidural steroid injections to treat radicular lumbosacral pain: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  Carmel Armon; Charles E Argoff; Jeffrey Samuels; Misha-Miroslav Backonja
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Novel Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Sang-Ha Shin; Jun-Seok Bae; Sang-Ho Lee; Han-Joong Keum; Ho-Jin Kim; Won-Seok Jang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.104

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect].

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Qingquan Kong; Limin Rong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  [Research progress in minimally invasive treatment of cervical nerve root canal stenosis under total endoscope].

Authors:  Zihan Zhang; Jian'an Gao; Wenbo Liao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.