Yiming Xiao1, Maryse Fortin2, Michele C Battié3,4, Hassan Rivaz2,5. 1. Robarts Research Institute, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street North, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada. yxiao286@uwo.ca. 2. PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. 3. School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Canada. 4. Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Canada. 5. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Growing evidence suggests an association between lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration and low back pain (LBP). Currently, time-consuming and laborious manual segmentations of paraspinal muscles are commonly performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial scans. Automated image analysis algorithms can mitigate these drawbacks, but they often require individual MRIs to be aligned to a standard "reference" atlas. Such atlases are well established in automated neuroimaging analysis. Our aim was to create atlases of similar nature for automated paraspinal muscle measurements. METHODS: Lumbosacral T2-weighted MRIs were acquired from 117 patients who experienced LBP, stratified by gender and age group (30-39, 40-49, and 50-59 years old). Axial MRI slices of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels at mid-disc were obtained and aligned using group-wise linear and nonlinear image registration to produce a set of unbiased population-averaged atlases for lumbar paraspinal muscles. RESULTS: The resulting atlases represent the averaged morphology and MRI intensity features of the corresponding cohorts. Differences in paraspinal muscle shapes and fat infiltration levels with respect to gender and age can be visually identified from the population-averaged data from both linear and nonlinear registrations. CONCLUSION: We constructed a set of population-averaged atlases for developing automated algorithms to help analyze paraspinal muscle morphometry from axial MRI scans. Such an advancement could greatly benefit the fields of paraspinal muscle and LBP research. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: Growing evidence suggests an association between lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration and low back pain (LBP). Currently, time-consuming and laborious manual segmentations of paraspinal muscles are commonly performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) axial scans. Automated image analysis algorithms can mitigate these drawbacks, but they often require individual MRIs to be aligned to a standard "reference" atlas. Such atlases are well established in automated neuroimaging analysis. Our aim was to create atlases of similar nature for automated paraspinal muscle measurements. METHODS: Lumbosacral T2-weighted MRIs were acquired from 117 patients who experienced LBP, stratified by gender and age group (30-39, 40-49, and 50-59 years old). Axial MRI slices of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels at mid-disc were obtained and aligned using group-wise linear and nonlinear image registration to produce a set of unbiased population-averaged atlases for lumbar paraspinal muscles. RESULTS: The resulting atlases represent the averaged morphology and MRI intensity features of the corresponding cohorts. Differences in paraspinal muscle shapes and fat infiltration levels with respect to gender and age can be visually identified from the population-averaged data from both linear and nonlinear registrations. CONCLUSION: We constructed a set of population-averaged atlases for developing automated algorithms to help analyze paraspinal muscle morphometry from axial MRI scans. Such an advancement could greatly benefit the fields of paraspinal muscle and LBP research. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: David W Shattuck; Mubeena Mirza; Vitria Adisetiyo; Cornelius Hojatkashani; Georges Salamon; Katherine L Narr; Russell A Poldrack; Robert M Bilder; Arthur W Toga Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Yiming Xiao; Vladimir Fonov; Silvain Bériault; Fahd Al Subaie; M Mallar Chakravarty; Abbas F Sadikot; G Bruce Pike; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Tom A Ranger; Flavia M Cicuttini; Tue S Jensen; Waruna L Peiris; Sultana Monira Hussain; Jessica Fairley; Donna M Urquhart Journal: Spine J Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Vladimir Fonov; Alan C Evans; Kelly Botteron; C Robert Almli; Robert C McKinstry; D Louis Collins Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anoosha Pai S; Honglin Zhang; Jason R Shewchuk; Bedoor Al Omran; John Street; David Wilson; Majid Doroudi; Stephen H M Brown; Thomas R Oxland Journal: JOR Spine Date: 2020-07-01