Literature DB >> 30913967

Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Rebecca J Crawford, Maryse Fortin, Kenneth A Weber, Andrew Smith, James M Elliott.   

Abstract

SYNOPSIS: Persistent spinal (traumatic and nontraumatic) pain is common and contributes to high societal and personal costs globally. There is an acknowledged urgency for new and interdisciplinary approaches to the condition, and soft tissues, including skeletal muscles, the spinal cord, and the brain, are rightly receiving increased attention as important biological contributors. In reaction to the recent suspicion and questioned value of imaging-based findings, this paper serves to recognize the promise that the technological evolution of imaging techniques, and particularly magnetic resonance imaging, is allowing in characterizing previously less visible morphology. We emphasize the value of quantification and data analysis of several contributors in the biopsychosocial model for understanding spinal pain. Further, we highlight emerging evidence regarding the pathobiology of changes to muscle composition (eg, atrophy, fatty infiltration), as well as advancements in neuroimaging and musculoskeletal imaging techniques (eg, fat-water imaging, functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion imaging, magnetization transfer imaging) for these important soft tissues. These noninvasive and objective data sources may complement known prognostic factors of poor recovery, patient self-report, diagnostic tests, and the "-omics" fields. When combined, advanced "big-data" analyses may assist in identifying associations previously not considered. Our clinical commentary is supported by empirical findings that may orient future efforts toward collaborative conversation, hypothesis generation, interdisciplinary research, and translation across a number of health fields. Our emphasis is that magnetic resonance imaging technologies and research are crucial to the advancement of our understanding of the complexities of spinal conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(5):320-329. Epub 26 Mar 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8793.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; muscle; pain; soft tissues; spinal cord; spine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30913967      PMCID: PMC6608575          DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  136 in total

Review 1.  Computational cardiac atlases: from patient to population and back.

Authors:  Alistair A Young; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.969

2.  A population-based survey of beliefs about neck pain from whiplash injury, work-related neck pain, and work-related upper extremity pain.

Authors:  Geoff P Bostick; Robert Ferrari; Linda J Carroll; Anthony S Russell; Rachelle Buchbinder; Donald Krawciw; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury.

Authors:  J D Cassidy; L J Carroll; P Côté; M Lemstra; A Berglund; A Nygren
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease.

Authors:  A Vania Apkarian; M Catherine Bushnell; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  A prospective cohort study of the outcome of acute whiplash injury in Greece.

Authors:  M Partheni; C Constantoyannis; R Ferrari; G Nikiforidis; S Voulgaris; N Papadakis
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain.

Authors:  Marwan N Baliki; Dante R Chialvo; Paul Y Geha; Robert M Levy; R Norman Harden; Todd B Parrish; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Laypersons' expectation of the sequelae of whiplash injury: a cross-cultural comparative study between Canada and Greece.

Authors:  Robert Ferrari; Constantine Constantoyannis; Nikolas Papadakis
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2003-03

8.  Differences in low back pain behavior are reflected in the cerebral response to tactile stimulation of the lower back.

Authors:  Donna Lloyd; Gordon Findlay; Neil Roberts; Turo Nurmikko
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to evaluate spinal cord axonal injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; Bonnie Freitas; David L McArthur; Noriko Salamon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-03

10.  Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density.

Authors:  A Vania Apkarian; Yamaya Sosa; Sreepadma Sonty; Robert M Levy; R Norman Harden; Todd B Parrish; Darren R Gitelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does Overall Cervical Spine Pathology Relate to the Clinical Heterogeneity of Chronic Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Todd B Parrish; David M Walton; Amy J Vassallo; Joel Fundaun; Marie Wasielewski; D Mark Courtney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Broadening horizons: the case for capturing function and the role of health informatics in its use.

Authors:  Denis Newman-Griffis; Julia Porcino; Ayah Zirikly; Thanh Thieu; Jonathan Camacho Maldonado; Pei-Shu Ho; Min Ding; Leighton Chan; Elizabeth Rasch
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Convolutional neural networks for the automatic segmentation of lumbar paraspinal muscles in people with low back pain.

Authors:  E O Wesselink; J M Elliott; M W Coppieters; M J Hancock; B Cronin; A Pool-Goudzwaard; K A Weber Ii
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  CORR Insights®: Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Fatty Degeneration Is Not Associated with Muscle Cross-sectional Area: Qualitative Assessment Is Preferable for Cervical Sarcopenia.

Authors:  John M Popovich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.