PURPOSE: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second leading neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease. In PD research and its surgical treatment, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), anatomical structural identification and references for spatial normalization are essential, and human brain atlases/templates are proven highly instrumental. However, two shortcomings affect current templates used for PD. First, many templates are derived from a single healthy subject that is not sufficiently representative of the PD-population anatomy. This may result in suboptimal surgical plans for DBS surgery and biased analysis for morphological studies. Second, commonly used mono-contrast templates lack sufficient image contrast for some subcortical structures (i.e., subthalamic nucleus) and biochemical information (i.e., iron content), a valuable feature in current PD research. METHODS: We employed a novel T1-T2* fusion MRI that visualizes both cortical and subcortical structures to drive groupwise registration to create co-registered multi-contrast (T1w, T2*w, T1-T2* fusion, phase, and an R2* map) unbiased templates from 15 PD patients, and a high-resolution histology-derived 3D atlas is co-registered. For validation, these templates are compared against the Colin27 template for landmark registration and midbrain nuclei segmentation. RESULTS: While the T1w, T2*w, and T1-T2* fusion templates provide excellent anatomical details for both cortical and subcortical structures, the phase and R2* map contain the biochemical features. By one-way ANOVA tests, our templates significantly ([Formula: see text]) outperform the Colin27 template in the registration-based tasks. CONCLUSION: The proposed unbiased templates are more representative of the population of interest and can benefit both the surgical planning and research of PD.
PURPOSE:Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second leading neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease. In PD research and its surgical treatment, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), anatomical structural identification and references for spatial normalization are essential, and humanbrain atlases/templates are proven highly instrumental. However, two shortcomings affect current templates used for PD. First, many templates are derived from a single healthy subject that is not sufficiently representative of the PD-population anatomy. This may result in suboptimal surgical plans for DBS surgery and biased analysis for morphological studies. Second, commonly used mono-contrast templates lack sufficient image contrast for some subcortical structures (i.e., subthalamic nucleus) and biochemical information (i.e., iron content), a valuable feature in current PD research. METHODS: We employed a novel T1-T2* fusion MRI that visualizes both cortical and subcortical structures to drive groupwise registration to create co-registered multi-contrast (T1w, T2*w, T1-T2* fusion, phase, and an R2* map) unbiased templates from 15 PDpatients, and a high-resolution histology-derived 3D atlas is co-registered. For validation, these templates are compared against the Colin27 template for landmark registration and midbrain nuclei segmentation. RESULTS: While the T1w, T2*w, and T1-T2* fusion templates provide excellent anatomical details for both cortical and subcortical structures, the phase and R2* map contain the biochemical features. By one-way ANOVA tests, our templates significantly ([Formula: see text]) outperform the Colin27 template in the registration-based tasks. CONCLUSION: The proposed unbiased templates are more representative of the population of interest and can benefit both the surgical planning and research of PD.
Authors: Ruth L O'Gorman; Karin Shmueli; Keyoumars Ashkan; Michael Samuel; David J Lythgoe; Asal Shahidiani; Stephen J Wastling; Michelle Footman; Richard P Selway; Jozef Jarosz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: David W Shattuck; Mubeena Mirza; Vitria Adisetiyo; Cornelius Hojatkashani; Georges Salamon; Katherine L Narr; Russell A Poldrack; Robert M Bilder; Arthur W Toga Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M Miller; A Banerjee; G Christensen; S Joshi; N Khaneja; U Grenander; L Matejic Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Yuki Hori; David J Schaeffer; Atsushi Yoshida; Justine C Cléry; Lauren K Hayrynen; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Stefan Everling Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Yiming Xiao; Vladimir S Fonov; Silvain Beriault; Ian Gerard; Abbas F Sadikot; G Bruce Pike; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Mikhail Milchenko; Scott A Norris; Kathleen Poston; Meghan C Campbell; Mwiza Ushe; Joel S Perlmutter; Abraham Z Snyder Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-08
Authors: Yiming Xiao; Vladimir Fonov; M Mallar Chakravarty; Silvain Beriault; Fahd Al Subaie; Abbas Sadikot; G Bruce Pike; Gilles Bertrand; D Louis Collins Journal: Data Brief Date: 2017-04-15