Literature DB >> 34542672

Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group.

Paul W Hodges1, Jeannie F Bailey2, Maryse Fortin3, Michele C Battié4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding.
METHODS: Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research.
RESULTS: Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research.
CONCLUSION: Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multifidus; Paraspinal muscles; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34542672     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  112 in total

1.  On the reflex effects from the knee joint of the cat.

Authors:  J EKHOLM; G EKLUND; S SKOGLUND
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1960-10-31

2.  Geography of Lumbar Paravertebral Muscle Fatty Infiltration: The Influence of Demographics, Low Back Pain, and Disability.

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Thomas Volken; Áine Ni Mhuiris; Cora C Bow; James M Elliott; Mark A Hoggarth; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Are the size and composition of the paraspinal muscles associated with low back pain? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom A Ranger; Flavia M Cicuttini; Tue S Jensen; Waruna L Peiris; Sultana Monira Hussain; Jessica Fairley; Donna M Urquhart
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Reflex actions of knee joint afferents during contraction of the human quadriceps.

Authors:  J F Iles; M Stokes; A Young
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1990-09

5.  Rapid atrophy of the lumbar multifidus follows experimental disc or nerve root injury.

Authors:  Paul Hodges; Allison Kaigle Holm; Tommy Hansson; Sten Holm
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing for the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Henry C Tong; Karen S J Yamakawa; Douglas J Quint; Julian T Hoff; Anthony Chiodo; Jennifer A Miner; Vaishali R Choksi; Michael E Geisser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Corticomotor excitability of back muscles is affected by intervertebral disc lesion in pigs.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; Mary P Galea; Sten Holm; Allison Kaigle Holm
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 8.  Structural Changes of Lumbar Muscles in Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dorien Goubert; Jessica Van Oosterwijck; Mira Meeus; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  The Association between Imaging Parameters of the Paraspinal Muscles, Spinal Degeneration, and Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; Eli Carmeli; Ella Been
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Relationships between paraspinal muscle morphology and neurocompressive conditions of the lumbar spine: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Cooley; Bruce F Walker; Emad M Ardakani; Per Kjaer; Tue S Jensen; Jeffrey J Hebert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  6 in total

1.  Spatial distribution of fat infiltration within the paraspinal muscles: implications for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Karim Khattab; Lucas K Dziesinski; Rebecca Crawford; Alex Ballatori; Priya Nyayapati; Roland Krug; Aaron Fields; Conor W O'Neill; Jeffrey C Lotz; Jeannie F Bailey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study.

Authors:  Hasan Banitalebi; Jørn Aaen; Kjersti Storheim; Anne Negård; Tor Åge Myklebust; Margreth Grotle; Christian Hellum; Ansgar Espeland; Masoud Anvar; Kari Indrekvam; Clemens Weber; Jens Ivar Brox; Helena Brisby; Erland Hermansen
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-07-20

Review 3.  Restorative Neurostimulation: A Clinical Guide for Therapy Adoption.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; David Lee; Jennifer Tram; Samir Sheth; Robert Heros; Smith Manion; Vikas Patel; Kyle Kiesel; Yousef Ghandour; Christopher Gilligan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Noah B Bonnheim; Gabby B Joseph; Ravi Chachad; Jiamin Zhou; Zehra Akkaya; Amir M Pirmoazen; Jeannie F Bailey; Xiaojie Guo; Ann A Lazar; Thomas M Link; Aaron J Fields; Roland Krug
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.119

5.  Age- and sex-dependent differences in the morphology and composition of paraspinal muscles between subjects with and without lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Rufeng Huang; Fumin Pan; Chao Kong; Shibao Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Using hierarchical unsupervised learning to integrate and reduce multi-level and multi-paraspinal muscle MRI data in relation to low back pain.

Authors:  Abel Torres-Espin; Anastasia Keller; Gabriel T A Johnson; Aaron J Fields; Roland Krug; Adam R Ferguson; Alan R Hargens; Conor W O'Neill; Jeffrey C Lotz; Jeannie F Bailey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.721

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.