Literature DB >> 32030218

An investigation of the classification accuracy of a deep learning framework-based computer-aided diagnosis system in different pathological types of breast lesions.

Mengsu Xiao1, Chenyang Zhao1, Qingli Zhu1, Jing Zhang1, He Liu1, Jianchu Li1, Yuxin Jiang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is an important method in aiding diagnosis for radiologists. We investigated the accuracy of a deep learning-based CAD in classifying breast lesions with different histological types.
METHODS: A total of 448 breast lesions were detected on ultrasound (US) and classified by an experienced radiologist, a resident and deep learning-based CAD respectively. The pathological results of the lesions were chosen as the golden standard. The diagnostic performances of the three raters in different pathological types were analyzed.
RESULTS: For the overall diagnostic performance, deep learning-based CAD presented a significantly higher specificity (76.96%) compared with the two radiologists. The area under ROC of CAD was almost equal with the experienced radiologist (0.81 vs. 0.81), while significantly higher than the resident (0.81 vs. 0.70, P<0.0001). In the benign lesions, deep learning-based CAD had a higher accuracy than both the two radiologists, which correctly classified as benign lesions in 119/135 of fibroadenomas (88.1%), 25/35 of adenosis (71.4%), 14/27 of intraductal papillary tumors (51.9%), 5/10 of inflammation (50%), and 4/8 of sclerosing adenosis (50%). But only the differences between CAD and the two radiologists in fibroadenomas had statistical significance (P=0.0011 and P=0.0313), and the differences between CAD and the resident in adenosis had statistical significance (P=0.012). In the malignant lesions, 151/168 of invasive ductal carcinomas (89.9%), 21/29 of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (72.4%) and 6/7 of invasive lobular carcinomas (85.7%) were diagnosed as malignancies by deep learning-based CAD, with no significant differences between CAD and the two radiologists.
CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnosis of these common types of breast lesions, deep learning-based CAD had a satisfying performance. Deep learning-based CAD had a better performance in the breast benign lesions, especially in fibroadenomas and adenosis. Therefore, deep learning-based CAD is a promising supplemental tool to US to increase the specificity and avoid unnecessary benign biopsies. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; breast; diagnosis, computer-aided; pathology; ultrasound (US)

Year:  2019        PMID: 32030218      PMCID: PMC6988000          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  26 in total

1.  Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Jin You Kim; Won Hwa Kim; Min Sun Bae; Ann Yi; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Ultrasound molecular imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant tumors in patients.

Authors:  Fei Yan; Zhuqing Song; Meng Du; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-12

3.  A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images.

Authors:  Seokmin Han; Ho-Kyung Kang; Ja-Yeon Jeong; Moon-Ho Park; Wonsik Kim; Won-Chul Bang; Yeong-Kyeong Seong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Automated classification of focal breast lesions according to S-detect: validation and role as a clinical and teaching tool.

Authors:  Mattia Di Segni; Valeria de Soccio; Vito Cantisani; Giacomo Bonito; Antonello Rubini; Gabriele Di Segni; Sveva Lamorte; Valentina Magri; Corrado De Vito; Giuseppe Migliara; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Alessio Metere; Laura Giacomelli; Carlo de Felice; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-04-21

Review 5.  Review of radiological screening programmes for breast, lung and pancreatic malignancy.

Authors:  Helena Barton; David Shatti; Charlotte Anne Jones; Mathuri Sakthithasan; Will W Loughborough
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-06

6.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.

Authors:  Vittorio Corsetti; Nehmat Houssami; Aurora Ferrari; Marco Ghirardi; Sergio Bellarosa; Osvaldo Angelini; Claudio Bani; Pasquale Sardo; Giuseppe Remida; Enzo Galligioni; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Radiomic analysis using contrast-enhanced CT: predict treatment response to pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy in gastric carcinoma with abdominal cavity metastasis.

Authors:  Zhen Hou; Yang Yang; Shuangshuang Li; Jing Yan; Wei Ren; Juan Liu; Kangxin Wang; Baorui Liu; Suiren Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-05

9.  Feasibility of computer-assisted diagnosis for breast ultrasound: the results of the diagnostic performance of S-detect from a single center in China.

Authors:  Chenyang Zhao; Mengsu Xiao; Yuxin Jiang; He Liu; Ming Wang; Hongyan Wang; Qiang Sun; Qingli Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in breast radiology: current progress and future directions.

Authors:  William C Ou; Dogan Polat; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Yu-Jing Yan; Ge-Ge Wu; Xi-Rong Ye; Fan Jiang; Jie Liu; Gang Wang; Yi Wang; Juan Song; Zhi-Ping Pan; Jin-Hua Hu; Chao-Ying Jin; Xiang Wang; Christoph F Dietrich; Xin-Wu Cui
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of the Quadri-Planes Method in Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Lesions by Ultrasonography: Prospective Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Liang Yongping; Zhang Juan; Ping Zhou; Zhao Yongfeng; Wengang Liu; Yifan Shi
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-05-05

4.  Diagnostic Value of Breast Lesions Between Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System and Experienced Radiologists: Comparison the Performance Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.

Authors:  Mengsu Xiao; Chenyang Zhao; Jianchu Li; Jing Zhang; He Liu; Ming Wang; Yunshu Ouyang; Yixiu Zhang; Yuxin Jiang; Qingli Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.