| Literature DB >> 30046139 |
Shambhabi Chatterjee1, David de Gonzalo-Calvo1,2,3,4, Anselm A Derda1,5, Katharina Schimmel1, Kristina Sonnenschein1,5, Udo Bavendiek5, Johann Bauersachs5,6, Christian Bär7, Thomas Thum8,9,10.
Abstract
Telomere length is a marker of biological aging. Short leukocyte telomere length has been associated with various conditions including cardiovascular disorders. Here, we evaluated if patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have altered leukocyte telomere length and whether this is associated with disease severity. A quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based method was used to measure peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length in 59 healthy control subjects and a well-characterized cohort of 88 patients diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 32 patients with non-obstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM) and 56 patients with obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We observed shorter leukocyte telomeres in both HNCM and HOCM patients compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, leukocyte telomere length was inversely associated with HCM even after adjusting for age and sex. Telomere length of HOCM patients was also inversely correlated with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Therefore, HOCM patients were categorized by tertiles of telomere length. Patients in the first tertile (shortest telomeres) had a significantly increased left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end-diastole and higher left ventricular outflow tract gradients, whereas the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was lower compared with patients in the second and third tertile. In summary, telomere length is associated with the severity of the disease in the HOCM subtype.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30046139 PMCID: PMC6060137 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29072-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the study population.
| Variable | HCM | HNCM | HOCM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 88 | N = 32 | N = 56 | ||
| Age (years) | 54.5 ± 16.6 | 52.0 ± 18.2 | 55.9 ± 15.5 | 0.425 |
| Male N (%) | 43 (49) | 23 (72) | 20 (36) | 0.002 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.1 ± 11.6 | 21.6 ± 11.6 | 22.4 ± 11.7 | 0.651 |
|
| ||||
| IVS (mm) | 20.8 ± 8.1 | 19.3 ± 6.9 | 21.6 ± 8.6 | 0.153 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 43.0 ± 6.0 | 44.3 ± 5.8 | 42.2 ± 6.1 | 0.136 |
| Aortic root (mm) | 31.5 ± 4.6 | 31.4 ± 4.6 | 31.5 ± 4.7 | 0.826 |
| LVPWD (mm) | 11.7 ± 3.5 | 11.1 ± 2.8 | 12.2 ± 3.9 | 0.256 |
| LVOT-gr.max. (mmHg) | 73.1 ± 61.2 | 12.5 ± 10.1 | 90.4 ± 58.6 | <0.001 |
| LVEF reduced N (%) | 9 (10) | 9 (28) | 0 (0) | <0.001 |
| RVEF reduced N (%) | 8 (9) | 7 (22) | 1 (2) | 0.004 |
| Mitral insufficiency N (%) | ||||
| minor | 47 (53) | 22 (69) | 25 (45) | 0.067 |
| medium | 29 (33) | 7 (22) | 22 (39) | 0.095 |
| major | 5 (6) | 1 (3) | 4 (7) | 0.645 |
| missing | 7 (8) | 2 (6) | 5 (9) | |
|
| ||||
| Syncope N (%) | 14 (16) | 3 (9) | 11 (20) | 0.230 |
| Positive family history N (%) | 25 (28) | 6 (19) | 19 (34) | 0.134 |
| Dyspnoea N (%) | 46 (52) | 14 (44) | 32 (57) | 0.163 |
| NYHA N (%) | 0.223 | |||
| 1 | 21 (24) | 11 (34) | 10 (18) | |
| 2 | 37 (42) | 10 (31) | 27 (48) | |
| 3 | 18 (21) | 6 (20) | 12 (21) | |
| 4 | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
| missing | 11 (12) | 5 (15) | 6 (11) | |
| Angina pectoris N (%) | 13 (15) | 2 (6) | 11 (20) | 0.116 |
| Palpitations N (%) | 26 (30) | 9 (28) | 17 (30) | 0.808 |
| Peripheral edema N (%) | 10 (11) | 4 (13) | 6 (11) | 1.000 |
| Hypertension N (%) | 30 (34) | 12 (38) | 18 (32) | 0.640 |
| Diabetes mellitus N (%) | 8 (9) | 3 (9) | 5 (9) | 1.000 |
| Coronary artery disease N (%) | 13 (15) | 4 (13) | 9 (16) | 0.759 |
|
| ||||
| Beta blockers N (%) | 65 (74) | 24 (75) | 41 (73) | 1.000 |
| ACE inhibitors N (%) | 27 (31) | 9 (28) | 18 (32) | 0.806 |
| AT1 antagonists (%) | 7 (8) | 6 (19) | 1 (2) | 0.009 |
| Diuretics N (%) | 29 (33) | 10 (31) | 19 (34) | 0.812 |
| Calcium antagonists N (%) | 17 (19) | 6 (19) | 11 (20) | 1.000 |
| Anticoagulation drugs N (%) | 38 (43) | 13 (41) | 25 (45) | 0.816 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables.
IVS = interventricular septum size; LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVPWD = left ventricular posterior wall thickness end diastole; LVOT-gr. max. = left ventricular outflow tract gradient maximum; LVEF = left ventricle ejection fraction; RVEF = right ventricle ejection fraction; ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; AT1 = angiotensin I.
Figure 1Telomere length distribution in control, HNCM and HOCM. (A) Relative leukocyte telomere length expressed as the log-transformed ratio of the telomeric sequence to single reference gene (T/S), plotted as a function of age. The negative slopes of the linear regression lines indicate age-related telomere shortening. (B) Average log-transformed T/S ratio in control subjects versus HNCM and HOCM patients. The results are shown as mean ± SD. Between-group differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. **P < 0.010.
Association between leukocyte telomere length and HCM.
| OR (95% IC) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | ||
| T/S | 0.004 (0.001, 0.060) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | ||
| T/S | 0.019 (0.001, 0.260) | 0.003 |
| Age | 1.066 (1.037, 1.096) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | ||
| T/S | 0.030 (0.002, 0.496) | 0.014 |
| Age | 1.068 (1.039, 1.098) | <0.001 |
| Sex | 0.687 (0.313, 1.501) | 0.351 |
OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval.
Correlation between leukocyte telomere length and echocardiographic parameter.
| IVSED | LVEDD | LVPWD | LVOT-gr.max | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNCM | r | 0.084 | −0.087 | 0.042 | −0.101 |
| 0.654 | 0.641 | 0.824 | 0.731 | ||
| HOCM | r | 0.165 | 0.281 | −0.170 | −0.291 |
| 0.238 | 0.044 | 0.265 | 0.043 | ||
Figure 2LTL is negatively associated with HOCM severity. HOCM patients were stratified by tertiles of telomere length. (A) Patients in the first tertile demonstrated significantly higher LVOT grad. max (D) and LVPWD (C) values, while LVEDD (B) was significantly lower in comparison to patients in tertile 2 & 3. The results are shown as mean ± SD. Between-group differences were analyzed using Student’s t-test for independent samples. *P < 0.050, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
| Human TL FW | GGTTTTTGAGGGTGAGGGTGAGGGTGAGGGTGAGGGT |
| Human TL RV | TCCCGACTATCCCTATCCCTATCCCTATCCCTACCCTA |
| Human | CAGCAAGTGGGAAGGTGTAATCC |
| Human | CCCATTCTATCATCAACGGGTACAA |