| Literature DB >> 30042345 |
Dawit Beyene1, Michael Chae2, Jing Dai3, Christophe Danumah4, Frank Tosto5, Abayneh Getachew Demesa6, David C Bressler7.
Abstract
Integrating enzymatic treatment and acid hydrolysis potentially improves the economics of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) production and demonstrates a sustainable cellulosic ethanol co-generation strategy. In this study, the effect of enzymatic treatment on filter paper and wood pulp fibers, and CNCs generated via subsequent acid hydrolysis were assessed. Characterization was performed using a pulp quality monitoring system, scanning and transmission electron microscopies, dynamic light scattering, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. Enzymatic treatment partially reduced fiber length, but caused swelling, indicating simultaneous fragmentation and layer erosion. Preferential hydrolysis of less ordered cellulose by cellulases slightly improved the crystallinity index of filter paper fiber from 86% to 88%, though no change was observed for wood pulp fibre. All CNC colloids were stable with zeta potential values below -39 mV and hydrodynamic diameters ranging from 205 to 294 nm. Furthermore, the temperature for the peak rate of CNC thermal degradation was generally not affected by enzymatic treatment. These findings demonstrate that CNCs of comparable quality can be produced from an enzymatically-mediated acid hydrolysis biorefining strategy that co-generates fermentable sugars for biofuel production.Entities:
Keywords: acid hydrolysis; cellulase; cellulose hydrolysis; cellulose nanocrystals; crystallinity; enzymatic treatment; particle size; zeta potential
Year: 2018 PMID: 30042345 PMCID: PMC6117684 DOI: 10.3390/ma11081272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Length and width of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) from different sources.
| Feedstock | Length (nm) | Width (nm) | Aspect Ratio | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood | 105–147 | 4.5–5 | 23–31 | [ |
| Cotton | 130–180 | 10–14 | NR | [ |
| Coconut fiber | 177–218 | 5–7 | 35–44 | [ |
| Rice straw | 117–270 | 11–30 | 9–11 | [ |
| Bagasse | 250–480 | 20–60 | NR | [ |
| Bacteria | 1103 | 14 | 94 | [ |
| Tunicate | 1187 | 9 | 148 | [ |
NR—not reported.
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of untreated (0 h) and enzyme-treated (10 h) filter paper.
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph of filter paper fiber, treated with cellulase for (a) 0 h, (b) 2 h, and (c) 10 h and wood pulp fiber treated with cellulase for (d) 0 h, (e) 2 h, and (f) 10 h.
Average length and width of enzyme-treated filter paper and wood pulp based on pulp quality monitoring analysis.
| Enzymatic Treatment (h) | Filter Paper | Wood Pulp | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | Width (μm) | Length (mm) | Width (μm) | |
| 0 | 1.21 ± 0.10 A | 29 ± 1 a | 1.10 ± 0.01 P | 32 ± 0 p |
| 2 | 0.90 ± 0.11 B | 33 ± 1 b | 0.88 ± 0.07 Q | 37 ± 1 q |
| 6 | 0.71 ± 0.01 B,C | 36 ± 1 b | 0.75 ± 0.07 Q | 42 ± 1 r |
| 10 | 0.68 ± 0.03 C | 35 ± 2 b | 0.75 ± 0.06 Q,* | 41 ± 1 r |
Means with non-identical letters (in superscripts) within each column are significantly different (p < 0.05). * Calculated from duplicates after removing an outlier.
Figure 3Length distribution of enzyme-treated (a) filter paper and (b) wood pulp fibers. Means with non-identical letters (in superscripts) are significantly different (p < 0.05) from comparisons within a given fiber length size as a function of time for each chart.
Degree of crystallinity of enzyme-treated cellulose chains and cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) isolated from filter paper and wood pulp via acid hydrolysis.
| Enzymatic Treatment (hrs) | Crystallinity Index (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzyme-Treated Fiber | CNC Isolated via Acid Hydrolysis | |||
| Filter Paper | Wood Pulp | Filter Paper | Wood Pulp | |
| 0 | 85.9 ± 0.7 A | 76.6 ± 0.8 P | 88.2 ± 0.5 A | 80.2 ± 0.9 P |
| 2 | 87.3 ± 1.0 A,B | 75.9 ± 1.8 P | 87.6 ± 0.9 A,B | 80.7 ± 3.5 P |
| 6 | 88.6 ± 0.6 B | 76.0 ± 1.4 P | 86.0 ± 0.6 B | 78.5 ± 2.2 P |
| 10 | 88.4 ± 0.4 B,* | 78.0 ± 1.8 P | 88.9 ± 0.3 A,* | 80.9 ± 0.8 P |
Means with non-identical letters (in superscripts) within each column are significantly different (p < 0.05). * Calculated from duplicates.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of CNC isolated from: filter paper enzyme-treated for (a) 0 h, (b) 2 h, and (c) 10 h and wood pulp enzyme-treated for (d) 0 h, (e) 2 h, and (f) 10 h.
Particle size and colloidal stability of CNCs isolated from enzyme-treated filter paper and wood pulp based on dynamic light scattering and zeta potential analyses.
| Enzymatic Treatment (h) | Filter Paper | Wood Pulp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) † | Intensity Abundance (%) | Zeta Potential (mV) | Average Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) | Intensity Abundance (%) | Zeta Potential (mV) | |
| 0 | 294 ± 51 A | 81 ± 12 | –40.5 ± 2.5 a | 245 ± 63 P | 80 ± 8 | –39.8 ± 3.6 p |
| 2 | 229 ± 53 B | 87 ± 11 | –41.9 ± 1.5 a,b | 225 ± 12 P | 96 ± 4 | –42.6 ± 1.4 p |
| 6 | 213 ± 9 B | 94 ± 4 | –43.8 ± 0.8 b | 243 ± 45 P | 83 ± 12 | –42.6 ± 3.5 p |
| 10 | 209 ± 14 B,* | 99 ± 2* | –43.8 ± 0.6 b,* | 205 ± 16 P | 90 ± 5 | –38.9 ± 2.7 p |
Means with non-identical letters (in superscripts) within each column are significantly different (p < 0.05). † Average diameter of the peak showing the highest abundance intensity. * Calculated from duplicates. The conductivity, pH, and temperature of the colloid were 0.7 to 0.9 mS/cm, 4.6 to 4.8, and 25 °C, respectively. The polydispersity indices ranged from 0.3 to 0.6, which measures the broadness of the size distribution. Colloid with an index value below 0.05 is monodisperse, below 0.08 is nearly monodisperse, 0.08–0.7 is midrange value, and above 0.7 is a broad distribution [48]. Data represent mean ± standard deviation of analytical triplicates (processed by the instrument) of treatment triplicates.
Particle size of CNC isolated from enzyme-treated filter paper and wood pulp based on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrograph analysis.
| Enzymatic Treatment (h) | Filter Paper | Wood Pulp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (nm) | Width (nm) | Aspect Ratio * | Length (nm) | Width (nm) | Aspect Ratio | |
| 0 | 116 ± 30 A | 8.8 ± 2.5 a | 13.2 ± 3.6 E,F | 113 ± 30 P,Q | 9.2 ± 3.3 p | 13.4 ± 5.1 W |
| 2 | 138 ± 44 B | 10.2 ± 3.0 b | 13.5 ± 3.8 E,F | 126 ± 42 P | 6.8 ± 2.1 r | 18.8 ± 5.4 X |
| 6 | 123 ± 45 A,B | 9.8 ± 3.0 a,b | 12.0 ± 3.7 E | 109 ± 33 Q | 7.9 ± 1.9 q | 14.0 ± 4.4 W |
| 10 | 134 ± 40 A,B,* | 9.5 ± 3.1 a,b,* | 15.1 ± 7.0 F,* | 123 ± 32 P | 7.6 ± 2.3 q,r | 17.5 ± 7.3 X |
Means with non-identical letters (in superscripts) within each column are significantly different (p < 0.05). * Calculated from duplicates.
Rate of CNC weight loss as a function of temperature.
| Enzymatic Treatment (h) | Temperature for Maximum Rate of Weight Loss %/°C | |
|---|---|---|
| Filter Paper (°C) | Wood Pulp (°C) | |
| 0 | 290 ± 32 A | 301 ± 2 P |
| 2 | 310 ± 1 A | 303 ± 0 P,Q |
| 6 | 311 ± 1 A | 302 ± 1 P,Q |
| 10 | 310 ± 2 A | 305 ± 1 Q |
Means with non-identical letters (in superscripts) within each column are significantly different (p < 0.05).