Literature DB >> 24746103

Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods.

Iulia A Sacui1, Ryan C Nieuwendaal, Daniel J Burnett, Stephan J Stranick, Mehdi Jorfi, Christoph Weder, E Johan Foster, Richard T Olsson, Jeffery W Gilman.   

Abstract

This work describes the measurement and comparison of several important properties of native cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), such as crystallinity, morphology, aspect ratio, and surface chemistry. Measurement of the fundamental properties of seven different CNCs/CNFs, from raw material sources (bacterial, tunicate, and wood) using typical hydrolysis conditions (acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation), was accomplished using a variety of measurement methods. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and 13C cross-polarization magic angle spinning (CPMAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy were used to conclude that CNCs, which are rodlike in appearance, have a higher crystallinity than CNFs, which are fibrillar in appearance. CNC aspect ratio distributions were measured and ranged from 148±147 for tunicate-CNCs to 23±12 for wood-CNCs. Hydrophobic interactions, measured using inverse gas chromatography (IGC), were found to be an important contribution to the total surface energy of both types of cellulose. In all cases, a trace amount of naturally occurring fluorescent compounds was observed after hydrolysis. Confocal and Raman microscopy were used to confirm that the fluorescent species were unique for each cellulose source, and demonstrated that such methods can be useful for monitoring purity during CNC/CNF processing. This study reveals the broad, tunable, multidimensional material space in which CNCs and CNFs exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746103     DOI: 10.1021/am500359f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  40 in total

1.  Recent advances in nanoengineering cellulose for cargo delivery.

Authors:  Amir Sheikhi; Joel Hayashi; James Eichenbaum; Mark Gutin; Nicole Kuntjoro; Danial Khorsandi; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Pectin and Mucin Enhance the Bioadhesion of Drug Loaded Nanofibrillated Cellulose Films.

Authors:  Patrick Laurén; Heli Paukkonen; Tiina Lipiäinen; Yujiao Dong; Timo Oksanen; Heikki Räikkönen; Henrik Ehlers; Päivi Laaksonen; Marjo Yliperttula; Timo Laaksonen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Physical, chemical, and toxicological characterization of fibrillated forms of cellulose using an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and co-culture model.

Authors:  Sahar H Pradhan; Marina R Mulenos; London R Steele; Matthew Gibb; James D Ede; Kimberly J Ong; Jo Anne Shatkin; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.524

4.  Optimization of cellulose nanocrystal length and surface charge density through phosphoric acid hydrolysis.

Authors:  Oriana M Vanderfleet; Daniel A Osorio; Emily D Cranston
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Bioinspired Bouligand cellulose nanocrystal composites: a review of mechanical properties.

Authors:  Bharath Natarajan; Jeffrey W Gilman
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Separation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals by multi-detector asymmetrical-flow field-flow fractionation.

Authors:  Arnab Mukherjee; Vincent A Hackley
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Dielectric Characterization of Confined Water in Chiral Cellulose Nanocrystal Films.

Authors:  Bharath Natarajan; Caglar Emiroglu; Jan Obrzut; Douglas M Fox; Beatriz Pazmino; Jack F Douglas; Jeffrey W Gilman
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 8.  Nanocelluloses - Nanotoxicology, Safety Aspects and 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Gary Chinga-Carrasco; Jennifer Rosendahl; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Particle Size Distributions for Cellulose Nanocrystals Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy: An Interlaboratory Comparison.

Authors:  Juris Meija; Michael Bushell; Martin Couillard; Stephanie Beck; John Bonevich; Kai Cui; Johan Foster; John Will; Douglas Fox; Whirang Cho; Markus Heidelmann; Byong Chon Park; Yun Chang Park; Lingling Ren; Li Xu; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Alycia K Knepp; Ralf Theissmann; Horst Purwin; Ziqiu Wang; Natalia de Val; Linda J Johnston
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Multimodality labeling strategies for the investigation of nanocrystalline cellulose biodistribution in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mirkka Sarparanta; Jacob Pourat; Kathryn E Carnazza; Jun Tang; Navid Paknejad; Thomas Reiner; Mauri A Kostiainen; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.