E P Buell1, K W Loerwald2, C T Engineer2, M S Borland2, J M Buell3, C A Kelly4, I I Khan4, S A Hays5, M P Kilgard2. 1. Texas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA; The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, 800 West Campbell Road, GR 41, Richardson, TX, 75080-3021, USA. Electronic address: ebuell@utdallas.edu. 2. Texas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA; The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, 800 West Campbell Road, GR 41, Richardson, TX, 75080-3021, USA. 3. Texas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA. 4. The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, 800 West Campbell Road, GR 41, Richardson, TX, 75080-3021, USA. 5. Texas Biomedical Device Center, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA; The University of Texas at Dallas, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, BSB 11, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Repeatedly pairing a brief train of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with an external event can reorganize the sensory or motor cortex. A 30 Hz train of sixteen VNS pulses paired with a tone significantly increases the number of neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) that respond to tones near the paired tone frequency. The effective range of VNS pulse rates for driving cortical map plasticity has not been defined. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This project investigated the effects of VNS rate on cortical plasticity. We expected that VNS pulse rate would affect the degree of plasticity caused by VNS-tone pairing. METHODS: Rats received sixteen pulses of VNS delivered at a low (7.5 Hz), moderate (30 Hz), or high (120 Hz) rate paired with 9 kHz tones 300 times per day over a 20 day period. RESULTS: More A1 neurons responded to the paired tone frequency in rats from the moderate rate VNS group compared to naïve controls. The response strength was also increased in these rats. In contrast, rats that received high or low rate VNS failed to exhibit a significant increase in the number of neurons tuned to sounds near 9 kHz. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the degree of cortical plasticity caused by VNS-tone pairing is an inverted-U function of VNS pulse rate. The apparent high temporal precision of VNS-tone pairing helps identify optimal VNS parameters to achieve the beneficial effects from restoration of sensory or motor function.
BACKGROUND: Repeatedly pairing a brief train of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with an external event can reorganize the sensory or motor cortex. A 30 Hz train of sixteen VNS pulses paired with a tone significantly increases the number of neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) that respond to tones near the paired tone frequency. The effective range of VNS pulse rates for driving cortical map plasticity has not been defined. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This project investigated the effects of VNS rate on cortical plasticity. We expected that VNS pulse rate would affect the degree of plasticity caused by VNS-tone pairing. METHODS:Rats received sixteen pulses of VNS delivered at a low (7.5 Hz), moderate (30 Hz), or high (120 Hz) rate paired with 9 kHz tones 300 times per day over a 20 day period. RESULTS: More A1 neurons responded to the paired tone frequency in rats from the moderate rate VNS group compared to naïve controls. The response strength was also increased in these rats. In contrast, rats that received high or low rate VNS failed to exhibit a significant increase in the number of neurons tuned to sounds near 9 kHz. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the degree of cortical plasticity caused by VNS-tone pairing is an inverted-U function of VNS pulse rate. The apparent high temporal precision of VNS-tone pairing helps identify optimal VNS parameters to achieve the beneficial effects from restoration of sensory or motor function.
Authors: Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi Journal: NPJ Sci Learn Date: 2020-08-06
Authors: Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; David T Pruitt; Katherine S Adcock; Jobin K Mathew; Stephanie T Abe; Dina M Abdulla; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Kristofer W Loerwald; Collin Chandler; Seth A Hays; Crystal T Engineer; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Michael S Borland; Will A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Elizabeth P Buell; Sven Vanneste; Michael P Kilgard; Crystal T Engineer Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Michael J Darrow; Tabarak M Mian; Miranda Torres; Zainab Haider; Tanya Danaphongse; Armin Seyedahmadi; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Eric C Meyers; Nimit Kasliwal; Bleyda R Solorzano; Elaine Lai; Geetanjali Bendale; Abigail Berry; Patrick D Ganzer; Mario Romero-Ortega; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 17.694