Literature DB >> 30904665

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Rate and Duration Determine whether Sensory Pairing Produces Neural Plasticity.

Elizabeth P Buell1, Michael S Borland2, Kristofer W Loerwald2, Collin Chandler3, Seth A Hays4, Crystal T Engineer2, Michael P Kilgard2.   

Abstract

Repeatedly pairing a brief train of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with an auditory stimulus drives reorganization of primary auditory cortex (A1), and the magnitude of this VNS-dependent plasticity is dependent on the stimulation parameters, including intensity and pulse rate. However, there is currently little data to guide the selection of VNS train durations, an easily adjusted parameter that could influence the effect of VNS-based therapies. Here, we tested the effect of varying the duration of the VNS train on the extent of VNS-dependent cortical plasticity. Rats were exposed to a 9 kHz tone 300 times per day for 20 days. Coincident with tone presentation, groups received trains of 4, 16, or 64 pulses of VNS delivered at 30 Hz, corresponding to train durations of 0.125 s, 0.5 s, and 2.0 s, respectively. High-density microelectrode mapping of A1 revealed that 0.5 s duration VNS trains significantly increased the number of neurons in A1 that responded to tones near the paired tone frequency. Trains lasting 0.125 or 2.0 s failed to alter A1 responses, indicating that both shorter and longer stimulation durations are less effective at enhancing plasticity. A second set of experiments evaluating the effect of delivering 4 or 64 pulses in a fixed 0.5 s VNS train duration paired with tone presentation reveal that both slower and faster stimulation rates are less effective at enhancing plasticity. We incorporated these results with previous findings describing the effect of stimulation parameters on VNS-dependent plasticity and activation of neuromodulatory networks to generate a model of synaptic activation by VNS.
Copyright © 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; duration; plasticity; pulses; vagal nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30904665      PMCID: PMC6511481          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  38 in total

1.  Increased extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine in cortex and hippocampus following vagus nerve stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  Rodney W Roosevelt; Douglas C Smith; Richard W Clough; Robert A Jensen; Ronald A Browning
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Enhancement of the function of rat serotonin and norepinephrine neurons by sustained vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Stella Manta; Jianming Dong; Guy Debonnel; Pierre Blier
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  The interaction of pulse width and current intensity on the extent of cortical plasticity evoked by vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Kristofer W Loerwald; Michael S Borland; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity.

Authors:  Navzer D Engineer; Jonathan R Riley; Jonathan D Seale; Will A Vrana; Jai A Shetake; Sindhu P Sudanagunta; Michael S Borland; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cortical map plasticity as a function of vagus nerve stimulation rate.

Authors:  E P Buell; K W Loerwald; C T Engineer; M S Borland; J M Buell; C A Kelly; I I Khan; S A Hays; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke.

Authors:  Navid Khodaparast; Seth A Hays; Andrew M Sloan; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a case series.

Authors:  Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste; Navzer D Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2013-11-20

8.  Locus coeruleus and dopaminergic consolidation of everyday memory.

Authors:  Tomonori Takeuchi; Adrian J Duszkiewicz; Alex Sonneborn; Patrick A Spooner; Miwako Yamasaki; Masahiko Watanabe; Caroline C Smith; Guillén Fernández; Karl Deisseroth; Robert W Greene; Richard G M Morris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Vagus nerve stimulation as a potential adjuvant to behavioral therapy for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Jesse Dawson; David Pierce; Anand Dixit; Teresa J Kimberley; Michele Robertson; Brent Tarver; Omar Hilmi; John McLean; Kirsten Forbes; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Steven C Cramer; Matthew Walters; Navzer Engineer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  8 in total

1.  Parametric characterization of the rat Hering-Breuer reflex evoked with implanted and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse E Bucksot; Karen Morales Castelan; Samantha K Skipton; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  A limited range of vagus nerve stimulation intensities produce motor cortex reorganization when delivered during training.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; David T Pruitt; Katherine S Adcock; Jobin K Mathew; Stephanie T Abe; Dina M Abdulla; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Pairing vagus nerve stimulation with tones drives plasticity across the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Michael S Borland; Will A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Elizabeth P Buell; Sven Vanneste; Michael P Kilgard; Crystal T Engineer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Vagus nerve stimulation does not improve recovery of forelimb motor or somatosensory function in a model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Katherine S Adcock; Tanya Danaphongse; Sarah Jacob; Harshini Rallapalli; Miranda Torres; Zainab Haider; Armin Seyedahmadi; Robert A Morrison; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The tactile experience paired with vagus nerve stimulation determines the degree of sensory recovery after chronic nerve damage.

Authors:  Michael J Darrow; Tabarak M Mian; Miranda Torres; Zainab Haider; Tanya Danaphongse; Armin Seyedahmadi; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  High intensity VNS disrupts VNS-mediated plasticity in motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; Stephanie T Abe; Madison E Stevens; Vikram Ezhil; Armin Seyedahmadi; Katherine S Adcock; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Cortical Responses to Vagus Nerve Stimulation Are Modulated by Brain State in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Irene Rembado; Weiguo Song; David K Su; Ariel Levari; Larry E Shupe; Steve Perlmutter; Eberhard Fetz; Stavros Zanos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 8.  A Review of Parameter Settings for Invasive and Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Applied in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Sean L Thompson; Georgia H O'Leary; Christopher W Austelle; Elise Gruber; Alex T Kahn; Andrew J Manett; Baron Short; Bashar W Badran
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.