Literature DB >> 30030945

Structure tensor informed fibre tractography at 3T.

Kwok-Shing Chan1, David G Norris1,2,3, José P Marques1.   

Abstract

Structure tensor informed fibre tractography (STIFT) based on informing tractography for diffusion-weighted images at 3T and by utilising the structure tensor obtained from gradient-recalled echo (GRE) images at 7T is able to delineate fibres when seed voxels are placed close to the fibre boundaries. However, incorporating data from two different field strengths limits the applicability of STIFT. In this study, STIFT was implemented with both diffusion-weighted images and GRE images acquired at 3T. Instead of using the magnitude GRE data directly for STIFT as in the previous work, the utility of T2 * maps and quantitative susceptibility maps derived from complex-valued GRE data to improve fibre delineation was explored. Single-seed tractography was performed and the results show that the optic radiation reconstructed with STIFT is more distinguishable from the inferior longitudinal fasciculus/inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus complex when compared to standard diffusion-weighted imaging tractography. We further investigated the quantitative effects of STIFT in a group of five healthy volunteers and evaluated its impact on measures of structural connectivity. The framework was extended to evaluate implementations of STIFT based on T2 *-weighted and quantitative susceptibility-weighted images in a whole-brain connectivity study. In terms of connectivity, no systematic differences were found between STIFT and diffusion-weighted imaging tractography, suggesting that local improvements in tractography are not translated to the atlas-based structural connectivity analysis. Nevertheless, the reduction in the number of statistically significant connections in the STIFT connectivity matrix suggests that STIFT can potentially reduce the false-positive connections in fibre tractography.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion weighted imaging; optic radiation, quantitative susceptibility mapping; structural connectivity; tractography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030945      PMCID: PMC6866445          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  50 in total

1.  Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor MRI.

Authors:  A L Alexander; K M Hasan; M Lazar; J S Tsuruda; D L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  L R Frank
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Tian Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Yi Wang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Pushing the limits of in vivo diffusion MRI for the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels.

Authors:  José V Manjón; Pierrick Coupé; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; D Louis Collins; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  How to choose the right MR sequence for your research question at 7T and above?

Authors:  José P Marques; David G Norris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging.

Authors:  K Setsompop; J Cohen-Adad; B A Gagoski; T Raij; A Yendiki; B Keil; V J Wedeen; L L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM: combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping.

Authors:  Simon Daniel Robinson; Kristian Bredies; Diana Khabipova; Barbara Dymerska; José P Marques; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  2 in total

1.  Structure tensor informed fibre tractography at 3T.

Authors:  Kwok-Shing Chan; David G Norris; José P Marques
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: A realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures.

Authors:  José P Marques; Jakob Meineke; Carlos Milovic; Berkin Bilgic; Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hedouin; Wietske van der Zwaag; Christian Langkammer; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.668

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.