Literature DB >> 28438666

How to choose the right MR sequence for your research question at 7T and above?

José P Marques1, David G Norris2.   

Abstract

The choice of a pulse sequence at ultra-high field can be influenced by a number of considerations and constraints that are not always the same as those at lower fields. Foremost amongst these is of course the information required and the time available, but considerations of static main field- and transmit field- inhomogeneities as well as power deposition can also play an important role. In this review we first briefly examine the characteristics of high field MRI, and then describe the performance and constraints relevant to the major imaging readouts, and their implementation with parallel imaging techniques. In the main body of the text we review the main current applications of neuro imaging at 7T: functional brain imaging; diffusion weighted imaging; structural imaging; and conclude with a brief summary of time of flight angiography. FMRI is explored in the context both of whole brain coverage, and for high resolution imaging of cortical layers and columns. The major pulse sequences considered include 3D and 2D EPI multi-echo EPI and spin echo EPI. Diffusion weighted single shot EPI is the sequence of choice with segmented approaches having some niche applications. In structural imaging a distinction is made between qualitative and quantitative approaches, with both T1 and T2*-based approaches considered. The application of these techniques to important brain pathologies is shown, in addition to their capability for high resolution imaging of cortical and sub-cortical anatomy. The advantages of 7T for time of flight angiography at 7T are elucidated and exemplary applications given.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28438666     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Structure tensor informed fibre tractography at 3T.

Authors:  Kwok-Shing Chan; David G Norris; José P Marques
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Realistic head-shaped phantom with brain-mimicking metabolites for 7 T spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Ghil Jona; Edna Furman-Haran; Rita Schmidt
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  New acquisition techniques and their prospects for the achievable resolution of fMRI.

Authors:  Saskia Bollmann; Markus Barth
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 4.  Imaging human engrams using 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tom Willems; Katharina Henke
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.753

Review 5.  Visualizing the Human Subcortex Using Ultra-high Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  M C Keuken; B R Isaacs; R Trampel; W van der Zwaag; B U Forstmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  MP2RAGEME: T1 , T2 * , and QSM mapping in one sequence at 7 tesla.

Authors:  Matthan W A Caan; Pierre-Louis Bazin; José P Marques; Gilles de Hollander; Serge O Dumoulin; Wietske van der Zwaag
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: A realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures.

Authors:  José P Marques; Jakob Meineke; Carlos Milovic; Berkin Bilgic; Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hedouin; Wietske van der Zwaag; Christian Langkammer; Ferdinand Schweser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  The impact of B1+ correction on MP2RAGE cortical T1 and apparent cortical thickness at 7T.

Authors:  Roy A M Haast; Dimo Ivanov; Kâmil Uludağ
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Direct visualization and characterization of the human zona incerta and surrounding structures.

Authors:  Jonathan C Lau; Yiming Xiao; Roy A M Haast; Greydon Gilmore; Kâmil Uludağ; Keith W MacDougall; Ravi S Menon; Andrew G Parrent; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  A plug-and-play, lightweight, single-axis gradient insert design for increasing spatiotemporal resolution in echo planar imaging-based brain imaging.

Authors:  Edwin Versteeg; Tijl A van der Velden; Carel C van Leeuwen; Martino Borgo; Erik R Huijing; Arjan D Hendriks; Jeroen Hendrikse; Dennis W J Klomp; Jeroen C W Siero
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.