Literature DB >> 25476716

Contrast dissimilarity effects on crowding are not simply another case of target saliency.

Einat Rashal1, Yaffa Yeshurun1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown crowding alleviation when target and flankers similarity is reduced. However, in the case of contrast dissimilarity, the findings were inconsistent. This study examined the effect of stimulus contrast, particularly contrast dissimilarity, on both overall performance under crowded conditions and the critical distance-the spatial extent of crowding. To this end, we measured orientation identification of a rotated T presented with and without flankers. Target contrast was either the same as the flankers or different: higher in Experiment 1 and lower in Experiment 2. Experiment 3 investigated the hypothesis that higher target contrast reduces crowding through attraction of attention to the salient target. Thus, this experiment included orthogonal manipulations of transient attention, via attentional precues, and contrast. The results show reduced crowding effects-better performance and smaller critical distance-when target contrast was higher than its flankers and increased crowding effects when target contrast was lower. In addition, the effects of attention did not interact with those of contrast, suggesting that the effect of high target contrast is not solely due to attraction of attention. Our results suggest that contrast dissimilarity effects reflect a differential contribution of the target and flankers to the faulty integration process underlying crowding.
© 2014 ARVO.

Keywords:  attention; contrast; critical distance; crowding

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25476716     DOI: 10.1167/14.6.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Lenka Musilová; František Pluhácek; Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell; John Siderov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Masking, crowding, and grouping: Connecting low and mid-level vision.

Authors:  Josephine Reuther; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Crowding in the S-cone pathway.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Combining S-cone and luminance signals adversely affects discrimination of objects within backgrounds.

Authors:  Ben J Jennings; Konstantinos Tsattalios; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Interaction between stimulus contrast and pre-saccadic crowding.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  The generality of the critical spacing for crowded optotypes: From Bouma to the 21st century.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Charles J H Ludowici; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.