Literature DB >> 30026514

The effects of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation on blood glucose and oxidative stress in subjects with prediabetes or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Hyeon Yeong Ahn1, Minjoo Kim1, Cho Rong Seo2, Hye Jin Yoo3, Sang-Hyun Lee4, Jong Ho Lee5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture on blood glucose and oxidative stress levels. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 60 subjects with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. The subjects were randomly assigned to either a group that ingested 40 g of a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture (19.45 g each) daily or a group that received a placebo for 12 weeks. Paired t-test and independent t-test were performed for comparisons within groups and between groups, respectively.
RESULTS: Supplementation with the Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture reduced the levels of fasting glucose (p < 0.001) and FFAs (p = 0.034), glucose at 60 min (p = 0.004), glucose (p = 0.006) areas under the response curve (AUC), homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (p = 0.018), and the urinary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α (8-epi-PGF2α) level (p = 0.028). The changes (Δ) in urinary 8-epi-PGF2α, glucose at 60 min, 120 min, and AUC, FFAs at 0 min and AUC were significantly different between the two groups. In addition, Δ glucose at 120 min (r = 0.472, p = 0.027) and the Δ glucose AUC (r = 0.572, p = 0.005) were positively correlated with △ plasma malondialdehyde in the test group.
CONCLUSIONS: The consumption of a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture for 12 weeks was effective for reducing postprandial glucose and oxidative stress level, particularly 8-epi-PGF2α, in subjects with IFG, IGT, or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30026514      PMCID: PMC6053428          DOI: 10.1038/s41387-018-0052-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Diabetes        ISSN: 2044-4052            Impact factor:   5.097


Introduction

Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease that is common worldwide and is caused by reduced organ function, which results in insulin resistance (IR) or lack of insulin[1]. According to the World Health Organization, 347 million people worldwide had diabetes in 2013, and diabetes will be the 7th most common cause of death by 2030[2]. The prevalence of diabetes worldwide was 6.4% in 2010 and will increase to 7.7% by 2030[3]. According to the 2013 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the incidence of diabetes has increased 2% since 2012[4]. People with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or both are at high risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes, which is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease[5,6]. The progression of IFG or IGT to type 2 diabetes can be delayed or prevented by lifestyle changes and pharmacological interventions[7]. According to the American Diabetes Association, medical nutrition therapy is an effective method for the management of diabetes[8]. Jerusalem artichoke is a root vegetable, and the main components include fructans (fructose molecules connected by β-2,1 bonds), specifically inulin and fructooligosaccharides[9]. Additionally, chicory is a main source of inulin-type fructans, which are commonly extracted from the Compositae family and are known as prebiotic dietary fibers. Inulin-type fructans resist hydrolysis by human small intestinal digestive enzymes due to the β-configuration of the anomeric C2 in its fructose monomer; thus, inulin-type fructans have been classified as non-digestible oligosaccharides[10,11]. The enhancement of gastrointestinal functions is a primary endpoint that benefits from inulin-type fructans and reduces gastrointestinal-related disease risks, such as intestinal infections, colon cancer, and obesity[12,13]. Moreover, inulin and fructooligosaccharides stimulate the immune system, reduce the synthesis of triglycerides and fatty acids in the liver, and decrease blood glucose levels[14]. Several studies revealed that inulin-type fructans supplementation modulate glycemic indices, lipid profile, antioxidant status[15], and some inflammatory, immunologic markers[16], and calcium homeostasis[17] in type 2 diabetes patients. Fermented soybeans have antidiabetic effects in diabetic animals and humans[18-20]. A previous study reported that the combination of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soy had complementary antidiabetic effects through the potentiation of insulinotropic action and the reduction of IR in diabetic rats[21]. Therefore, we hypothesized that these findings might be extrapolated to humans, and the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation on blood glucose and oxidative stress levels.

Subjects and methods

Study subjects

The study subjects were recruited from the outpatient clinics and the Health Service Center at the National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital (Goyang, Korea) from June 2013 to December 2014. According to the glucose test results, 60 subjects with IFG (100 mg/dL ≤ fasting blood glucose ≤ 125 mg/dL), IGT [140 mg/dL ≤ 2 h blood glucose in the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ≤ 199 mg/dL], or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this study. The aim of the study was carefully explained to all participants who provided written informed consent. Subjects were excluded if they had any diagnosis of cancer, renal disease, liver disease, chronic gastrointestinal disorder, or chronic alcoholism; were pregnant or breastfeeding; or had taken insulin agents or glucose-lowering medications for the past month. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University and National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital and registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02506582). Study subjects were randomly assigned to the test or placebo group. A computer-generated block randomization program assigned the groups (test group:placebo group = 1:1). The study sample size was determined using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). In an exploratory clinical trial, the postprandial glucose (PPG) level at 30 min decreased by 10.0 mg/dL in the test group compared with a reduction of 2.5 mg/dL in the placebo group. The sample size for this study was determined using the following parameters: Superiority test Level of significance, α = 0.05 β = 0.2, power=80% Rates for participants in the test group and placebo group, λ = 1, n (participant number of the test group) = λn (participant number of the placebo group). We hypothesized that the changes in PPG levels at 30 min for the test group (μ) would be 10.0 mg/dL, and those changes for the placebo group (μ) would be 2.5 mg/dL. We assumed a standard deviation of 9.63 mg/dL for both the test group (σ) and the placebo group (σ). The sample size was 21 subjects per group. Assuming a dropout rate of 30%, we determined that 30 subjects should be recruited per group. Sixty subjects were enrolled, of whom eight dropped out after randomization due to personal reasons. Among 52 subjects who completed participation in the 12-week intervention study, five subjects who had less than 80% compliance were excluded from final analysis; the compliance was calculated as follows: Compliance (%) = Actual number of consumed supplements/Expected number of consumed supplements × 100. Finally, 47 subjects [placebo group (n = 25), test group (n = 22)] were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow diagram demonstrating the process for inclusion and analysis of randomized clinical trials

Flow diagram demonstrating the process for inclusion and analysis of randomized clinical trials

Study design and materials

After recruiting the study subjects, the entire study process was conducted at the Clinical Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics Lab in Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. The study was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were divided into two groups. The test group consumed 40 g of a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture (3 times/day for 12 weeks) before each meal at home, and the placebo group consumed powdered rice flour (3 times/day for 12 weeks) before each meal at home; both the test and placebo products (powder) had low solubility, thus, we recommended the study subjects to take the powder first and then swallow it with water. The randomization list was blinded until the statistical analysis. The Jerusalem artichokes were sliced and steamed at 90–100 °C for 30 min, hot-air dried at 80 °C for 24 h and powdered. The soybeans were fermented with Bacillus spp. at 42 °C for 46 h, freeze-dried, and powdered. The 40 g Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture (19.45 g each) contained 150 mg/g of inulin, which consisted of 29% fructooligosaccharides. The test product contained the following components: 97.27% Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder, 2.65% cornstarch, 0.07% caramel coloring, and 0.01% L-menthol. The placebo product contained the following components: 84.71% rice flour, 2.32% cornstarch, 0.003% caramel coloring, 0.01% L-menthol, and 12.957% water. The products were provided by Midari Farm (Yeongwol, Kangwon-Do, Korea).

Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, and blood and urine collection

All parameters were measured twice: at baseline (week 0) and follow-up (week 12). The body weight, height, and waist circumference were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) was determined as units of kilograms per square meter (kg/m2). Waist and hip circumferences were measured using a flexible measuring tape. Blood pressure (BP) was measured in the left arm with an automatic BP monitor (FT-200S, Jawon Medical, Gyeongsan, Korea). Blood and urine samples were also obtained at baseline and follow-up. After a 12-h fasting period, venous blood specimens were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA)-treated tubes and plain tubes that were centrifuged to obtain plasma and serum. Urine was collected in polyethylene bottles containing 1% butylated hydroxytoluene. The collected samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis.

OGTT and glucose-related biomarkers

To conduct the OGTT (at baseline and follow-up, respectively), we prepared a glucosewater solution. Briefly, 75 g of anhydrous glucose was dissolved in 300 mL of room temperature water. The solution was consumed by the study participants after a 12-h overnight fast, and a fasting venous blood specimen was collected (0 min). Venous blood samples were also collected at 30-min or 60-min intervals for 2 h (30, 60, and 120 min) in EDTA-treated tubes and plain tubes. Then, aliquots of the samples were stored at −80 °C prior to further analysis. Serum fasting glucose and blood glucose concentrations during the OGTT were measured using a hexokinase method with a Hitachi 7600 Autoanalyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Serum insulin was measured by an immunoradiometric assay kit from DIAsource ImmunoAssays S.A. (Louvain, Belgium). IR was calculated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) method using the following equation: HOMA-IR = [Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) × Fasting glucose (mmol/L)]/22.5. Serum C-peptide was measured by an immunoradiometric assay with a C-peptide IRMA kit (Immunotech, Czech). Hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured by an immunoturbidimetric analyzer with a turbidimeter.

Serum lipid profile

Free fatty acids (FFAs) were measured using an enzymatic assay using the acyl-CoA synthetase-acyl-CoA oxidase method with a Hitachi 7600 Autoanalyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Triglycerides (TGs) and total cholesterol were measured with a Hitachi 7600 Autoanalyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was measured using an enzymatic method. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated by the Friedewald formula: LDL cholesterol = total cholesterol−[HDL cholesterol  + (TG/5)].

Urinary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α and plasma malondialdehyde

The urinary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α (8-epi-PGF2a) level was measured with a urinary isoprostane ELISA kit (Oxford Biomedical Research Inc., Rochester Hills, MI, USA). Urinary creatinine levels were determined using an alkaline picrate (Jaffe) reaction. Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured by determining the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) with a TBARS Assay Kit (ZeptoMetrix Co., Buffalo, NY, USA).

Dietary intake and total energy expenditure

The subjects were instructed to maintain their eating habits and a normal level of physical activity during the study period to ensure that any changes that were observed were not due to diet or physical activity. Nutrient intake was mainly calculated based on the 3-day dietary records (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day) using the Computer Aided Nutritional Analysis Program (CAN-pro 3.0, Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea). This record was completed at home after the study subjects received detailed explanations from well-trained dietitians. This measurement was repeated at weeks 0 and 12. In addition, the subjects completed a 24-h recall and a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire with the assistance of a dietitian at weeks 0 and 12 to confirm the accuracy of the dietary record. Total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated based on the basal metabolic rate (BMR), 24-h physical activity, and food-specific dynamic action, and the physical activity record was also completed at home on the same days that the dietary record was completed. The BMR was calculated using the Harris–Benedict equation. The 24-h physical activity was assessed by a physical activity questionnaire, developed based on the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) and translated into Korean, at weeks 0 and 12; and all questions from the physical activity questionnaire were answered under the administration of interviewers to improve the accuracy of the survey.

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary outcome of this study was an improvement in the 30 min PPG level during the OGTT. The secondary outcomes were an improvement in the fasting glucose level at the 12-week follow-up compared to baseline levels; differences in the blood glucose levels (subtract baseline values from follow-up values) between groups at each time point during the OGTT; and other glucose-related biomarkers, including insulin, HOMA-IR, C-peptide, and HbA1c levels.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 21.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). A paired t-test was conducted to compare the effect of supplementation within each group both before and after intervention. An independent t-test was conducted to compare the net change (Δ, difference from baseline) between the test and placebo groups. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to examine relationships between variables. A logarithmic transformation was performed on skewed variables. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error (SE), and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical and biochemical characteristics at baseline and changes of dietary intake

The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the placebo and test groups are presented in Table 1. No significant differences in baseline characteristics [i.e., age, sex distribution, height, weight, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), BPs, serum lipid profiles, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, C-peptide, 8-epi-PGF2α, or MDA] were observed between the groups. The urinary 8-epi-PGF2α level was significantly different between the two groups at baseline (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences observed in estimated total caloric intake (TCI), TEE, BMR, % carbohydrate intake, % protein intake, and % fat intake, and cholesterol intake at baseline and 12-week follow-up period between the test and placebo group (Table S1). In addition, the changed values of dietary intake and TEE did not show any significances between the two groups.
Table 1

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the placebo and test groups at baseline

Total (n = 47) p a p b p c p d
Placebo group (n = 25)Test group (n = 22)
BaselineFollow-upBaselineFollow-up
Age (years)56.0 ± 1.2854.4 ± 1.310.390
Males/females, n (%)10 (40.0)/15 (60.0)4 (18.2)/18 (81.8)0.102
Height (cm)161.6 ± 1.24158.9 ± 1.380.154
Weight (kg)64.3 ± 1.7264.2 ± 1.7960.4 ± 2.3560.2 ± 2.270.1880.170
 Change−0.03 ± 0.38−0.19 ± 0.300.7480.655
Body mass index (kg/m2)24.6 ± 0.5024.5 ± 0.5023.8 ± 0.6323.7 ± 0.600.3360.300
 Change−0.03 ± 0.14−0.07 ± 0.120.8380.672
Waist-to-hip ratio0.90 ± 0.010.89 ± 0.010.88 ± 0.010.88 ± 0.010.3870.466
 Change0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.5050.613
Systolic BP (mmHg)128.5 ± 2.69119.6 ± 2.21**127.4 ± 3.17119.6 ± 3.26*0.8010.998
 Change−8.88 ± 2.40−7.84 ± 2.770.7770.859
Diastolic BP (mmHg)79.5 ± 1.7275.8 ± 1.43*82.2 ± 1.8379.3 ± 2.470.2910.214
 Change−3.66 ± 1.36−2.84 ± 1.830.7170.469
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)e193.7 ± 5.29188.7 ± 6.28201.6 ± 6.03190.1 ± 6.170.3200.846
 Change−4.96 ± 4.56−11.6 ± 5.450.3550.535
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)e51.6 ± 1.9151.6 ± 2.3458.0 ± 2.7756.1 ± 2.850.0760.242
 Change0.00 ± 1.79−1.91 ± 1.370.4110.677
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)e119.9 ± 4.90114.9 ± 5.06120.9 ± 6.38112.4 ± 5.250.9930.733
 Change−4.95 ± 4.12−8.45 ± 4.990.5880.529
Triglycerides (mg/dL)e110.9 ± 10.1110.9 ± 11.5114.0 ± 13.1108.1 ± 10.60.9760.967
 Change−0.04 ± 12.5−5.91 ± 13.20.7480.732
Malondialdehyde (nmol/mL)e8.68 ± 0.358.10 ± 0.338.33 ± 0.277.92 ± 0.420.6850.634
 Change−0.58 ± 0.35−0.41 ± 0.430.7580.976

Mean ± SE

*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 derived from the paired t-test

ap-Values derived from the independent t-test for baseline values

bp-Values derived from the independent t-test for follow-up values

cp-Values derived from the independent t-test for change values

dp-Values adjusting for baseline

eTested by logarithmic transformation

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the placebo and test groups at baseline Mean ± SE *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 derived from the paired t-test ap-Values derived from the independent t-test for baseline values bp-Values derived from the independent t-test for follow-up values cp-Values derived from the independent t-test for change values dp-Values adjusting for baseline eTested by logarithmic transformation

The effects of 12 weeks of supplementation with a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture on blood glucose levels and blood glucose-related biomarkers

With the exception of BPs (Table 1), urinary 8-epi-PGF2α levels (Fig. 2), blood glucose, and FFAs (Table 2), no significant mean changes in any of the tested clinical or biochemical characteristics were noted between the placebo and test groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, the test group exhibited significant reductions in blood glucose at 0 min (p = 0.001) and 60 min (p = 0.004) and glucose areas under the response curve (AUC) (p = 0.007) (Table 2). The Δ serum level of blood glucose at 60 min (p = 0.013) and 120 min (p = 0.021) and the glucose AUC (p = 0.012) in the test group significantly differed from the placebo group, furthermore, these significances were maintained after adjusting for baseline values.
Fig. 2

HOMA-IR and urinary 8-epi-PGF2α levels at the initial visit (□) and the 12-week follow-up (■) and mean changes according to treatment.

Mean ± SE. Tested by logarithmic transformation. p-Values were determined using the independent t-test. p < 0.05 compared with baseline values in each group as determined by the paired t-test

Table 2

Blood glucose levels and glucose-related biomarkers of study participants

Total (n = 47) p a p b p c p d
Placebo group (n = 25)Test group (n = 22)
BaselineFollow-upBaselineFollow-up
Glucose 0 min (mg/dL)e107.6 ± 1.48101.3 ± 1.73**107.2 ± 1.6897.7 ± 2.63***0.8390.193
 Change−6.28 ± 1.78−9.45 ± 1.900.2300.210
Glucose 30 min (mg/dL)e189.2 ± 6.36185.6 ± 6.56189.7 ± 9.73186.8 ± 8.170.8490.956
 Change−3.56 ± 4.84−2.91 ± 8.860.9470.963
Glucose 60 min (mg/dL)e192.3 ± 9.88195.8 ± 9.51205.2 ± 11.8181.3 ± 12.0**0.4020.243
 Change3.56 ± 7.28−23.9 ± 7.74 0.013 0.021
Glucose 120 min (mg/dL)e153.4 ± 8.71166.5 ± 11.5167.7 ± 11.2154.0 ± 11.80.3670.463
 Change13.1 ± 8.22−13.7 ± 7.51 0.021 0.031
Glucose AUC (mg/dL×h)e342.4 ± 13.1348.3 ± 14.5359.4 ± 17.3330.8 ± 16.3**0.4700.378
 Change5.86 ± 9.05−28.6 ± 9.45 0.012 0.017
FFAs 0 min (μEq/L)e572.4 ± 42.0647.6 ± 43.6663.2 ± 50.5563.7 ± 26.2*0.1320.175
 Change75.2 ± 45.9−99.5 ± 41.6 0.008 0.027
FFAs 30 min (μEq/L)e304.6 ± 23.5350.2 ± 30.3334.8 ± 41.4327.1 ± 32.60.9860.652
 Change45.6 ± 23.6−7.77 ± 38.80.2340.163
FFAs 60 min (μEq/L)e251.2 ± 27.5281.8 ± 30.6251.6 ± 33.3254.5 ± 40.30.9350.268
 Change30.6 ± 20.82.86 ± 27.70.4210.400
FFAs 120 min (μEq/L)e92.4 ± 4.4084.5 ± 5.48104.2 ± 13.988.1 ± 9.800.9610.794
 Change−7.92 ± 5.18−16.1 ± 13.20.5690.429
FFAs AUC (μEq/L×h)e530.0 ± 29.2590.6 ± 30.4574.0 ± 39.2539.3 ± 34.50.4010.237
 Change60.6 ± 33.5−34.7 ± 30.8 0.044 0.066
Insulin 0 min (μIU/dL)e9.92 ± 0.559.52 ± 0.4210.1 ± 0.849.43 ± 0.800.9690.558
 Change−0.40 ± 0.50−0.71 ± 0.510.6620.592
Insulin 30 min (μIU/dL)e44.0 ± 5.0141.4 ± 3.8851.6 ± 5.8760.0 ± 9.250.3300.116
 Change−2.60 ± 3.738.42 ± 6.100.1200.086
Insulin 60 min (μIU/dL)e52.6 ± 5.3849.8 ± 5.6064.6 ± 6.1659.4 ± 6.510.1560.268
 Change−2.76 ± 4.34−5.24 ± 5.960.7340.777
Insulin 120 min (μIU/dL)e64.5 ± 8.0758.3 ± 6.4968.7 ± 11.664.7 ± 9.050.9120.661
 Change−6.16 ± 7.48−4.02 ± 7.530.8420.869
Insulin AUC (μIU/dL×h)e96.2 ± 7.6289.6 ± 6.46111.1 ± 10.6109.2 ± 10.70.3490.143
 Change−6.55 ± 5.30−1.91 ± 7.140.5990.290
Hemoglobin A1c (%)e5.96 ± 0.075.99 ± 0.075.99 ± 0.145.98 ± 0.130.9090.852
 Change0.03 ± 0.03−0.01 ± 0.050.4540.459
C-peptide (μEq/L)e2.16 ± 0.122.10 ± 0.092.21 ± 0.162.22 ± 0.160.9770.764
 Change−0.06 ± 0.080.01 ± 0.090.5500.493

Mean ± SE; AUC area under the curve, FFA free fatty acid

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 derived from the paired t-test

ap-Values derived from the independent t-test for baseline values

bp-Values derived from the independent t-test for follow-up values

cp-Values derived from the independent t-test for change values

dp-Values adjusting for baseline

eTested by logarithmic transformation

HOMA-IR and urinary 8-epi-PGF2α levels at the initial visit (□) and the 12-week follow-up (■) and mean changes according to treatment.

Mean ± SE. Tested by logarithmic transformation. p-Values were determined using the independent t-test. p < 0.05 compared with baseline values in each group as determined by the paired t-test Blood glucose levels and glucose-related biomarkers of study participants Mean ± SE; AUC area under the curve, FFA free fatty acid *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 derived from the paired t-test ap-Values derived from the independent t-test for baseline values bp-Values derived from the independent t-test for follow-up values cp-Values derived from the independent t-test for change values dp-Values adjusting for baseline eTested by logarithmic transformation The 12-week intervention with Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in the HOMA-IR (p = 0.018) (Fig. 2). FFA serum levels at 0 min in the test group exhibited a significant decrease after the 12-week intervention (p = 0.034) (Table 2). The Δ serum level of FFAs at 0 min (p = 0.008) and the FFA AUC (p = 0.044) in the test group significantly differed from the placebo group, furthermore, these significances were maintained after adjusting for baseline values. However, no significant differences in insulin levels at any time point and insulin AUC were noted between the placebo and test groups (Table 2).

The effects of 12 weeks of supplementation with a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture on oxidative stress markers

After 12 weeks of treatment, the test group exhibited a significant decrease in urinary 8-epi-PGF2α levels (p = 0.028), and the placebo group exhibited a significant increase in the urinary 8-epi-PGF2α level (p = 0.040) (Fig. 2). The Δ urinary 8-epi-PGF2α was significantly different between the two groups before (p = 0.003) and after adjusting for baseline value (p = 0.022). In the test group, the Δ glucose at 120 min was positively correlated with the Δ MDA (r = 0.472, p = 0.027), and the Δ glucose AUC was positively correlated with the Δ MDA (r = 0.572, p = 0.005) (Fig. 3). However, no significant associations were observed between Δ MDA and Δ glucose 120 min or between Δ MDA and Δ glucose AUC in the placebo group.
Fig. 3

Correlation between changes (Δ, difference from baseline) in blood glucose levels and plasma MDA in the placebo and test groups. r Pearson’s correlation coefficients

Correlation between changes (Δ, difference from baseline) in blood glucose levels and plasma MDA in the placebo and test groups. r Pearson’s correlation coefficients

Discussion

The antidiabetic effects of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybeans have raised interest in recent years; a previous study demonstrated that the combination of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean had complementary antidiabetic effects through the potentiation of insulinotropic action and the reduction of IR in diabetic rats[21]. Therefore, we hypothesized that these findings might be extrapolated to humans. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effect of supplementation with a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture on glucose control in subjects with IFG, IGT, or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. As a result, the primary outcome (PPG level at 30 min; a time point when blood glucose levels increased promptly and rapidly in response to food intake) did not show any significant changes. However, changes in the PPG level at 60 and 120 min showed greater decrease in the test group than in the placebo group; finally, the glucose AUC was significantly reduced in the test group. Thus, overall glucose metabolism was improved, although the test product was not effective at slowing the prompt glucose absorption. Moreover, decreased blood glucose and HOMA-IR levels in the test group revealed the antidiabetic effects of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybeans in human subjects. In addition, diminished FFA levels and 8-epi-PGF2α in the test group and the positive correlation between glucose and MDA levels suggested possible mechanisms related to the antidiabetic effects of Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybeans. The main component of Jerusalem artichoke is fructans, specifically inulin and fructooligosaccharides, which are dietary fiber that slow down absorption of blood glucose[22] and are not absorbed in the intestines[23]. Therefore, consumption of Jerusalem artichoke did not affect insulin levels, and the present study revealed that supplementation with the Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture did not affect insulin levels. Because of this absorption inhibition effect, we set a PPG level at 30 min, a time point that blood glucose increases rapidly, as a primary outcome rather than fasting glucose levels or PPG level at 120 min. Indeed, Chamukuttan et al.[24] demonstrated that elevated PPG level at 30 min during OGTT was independently associated with incident diabetes in Asian Indians population; and Kabaroğlu et al.[25] indicated that increased PPG level at 30 min (>140 mg/dL) during OGTT was related to higher systemic inflammatory levels in obese adolescents with normal glucose intolerance (fasting glucose < 100 mg/dL and PPG level at 120 min < 140 mg/dL). Thus, not only fasting glucose or PPG level at 120 min but also PPG level at 30 min becomes an important factor for regulating the risk of diabetes or diabetic-related disease. Moreover, in Korea, inulin is approved as an official functional material by Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; it stipulates that inulin has a function on improvement of PPG level. Based on the evidences, we assessed 30 min glucose in OGTT as a primary outcome. In the present study, although significant changes were not observed in 30 min glucose, changes in the PPG level at 60 and 120 min were significantly decreased in the test group than in the placebo group. Furthermore, the glucose AUC showed significant reduction in the test group. Thus, overall glucose metabolism was improved. Several studies also reported a beneficial effect of inulin on fasting glycemic control. A previous study demonstrated that fructooligosaccharide supplementation reduced fasting plasma glucose levels after 2 weeks in type 2 diabetes patients[26]. Another clinical trial demonstrated an antidiabetic effect of inulin-enriched pasta in humans, which reduced fasting glucose, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR levels[27]. In vivo studies have reported that Jerusalem artichoke supplementation improved IR and decreased the results of the OGTT. In addition, plasma glucose levels decreased with increasing levels of supplemented Jerusalem artichoke[28,29]. Inulin and fructooligosaccharides might affect glucose levels by changing the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1, which increases insulin secretion, delays gastric emptying, promotes β-cell proliferation, and reduces β-cell apoptosis[30-34]. The mechanism of the hypoglycemic effect of Jerusalem artichoke remains largely unknown. In clinical trials, the consumption of an inulin-rich product reduced HbA1c levels over 5 weeks[27], and the consumption of a fermented soybean product decreased fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels after 3 months in subjects with borderline and mild type 2 diabetes[35]. However, in the present study, HbA1c levels did not change during the study period. According to several studies, HbA1c levels show a poor correlation with the prediabetes status[36-38]. Since most of our study subjects displayed IFG levels or IGT and only a few individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were included in the study, HbA1c levels might not be a proper tool to evaluate the improvement in glucose control in the present study. Previous studies have demonstrated that long-term consumption of fermented soybean attenuated IR and improved glucose homeostasis in a type 2 diabetic animal model[18,39]. The biologically active components of fermented soybean include isoflavonoids and small peptides that are associated with IR and glycemic control[40,41]. These findings suggest potential mechanisms to explain the antidiabetic effect of fermented soybeans. According to a previous study, isoflavonoids might have an antidiabetic effect through estrogen-like action. Estrogen reduces IR through inhibition of intestinal glucose uptake and prevention of glucose-induced lipid peroxidation by inhibiting the sodium-dependent glucose transporter[42]. In addition, estrogen is associated with the stimulation of liver fatty acid metabolism and suppression of hepatic glucose production[43]. FFAs cause IR by inhibiting insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. High levels of plasma FFAs are associated with an increase in diacylglycerol and activation of protein kinase C, leading to increased tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 and resulting in increased insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity and IR[44,45]. The present study demonstrated that supplementation with a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture decreased FFAs and IR, and both of these effects are explained by the presence of isoflavonoids in fermented soybeans. Type 2 diabetes is associated with oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation is the main marker of oxidative stress that plays a major role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes[46-48]. In addition, 8-epi-PGF2α is a secondary end product of peroxidation that can impair β-cell function and lead to apoptosis[49]. Improved metabolic control reduced 8-epi-PGF2α by 32% in type 2 diabetes patients, and a clinical trial reported that 8-epi-PGF2α was three-fold higher in type 2 diabetes patients than in healthy individuals[50,51]. Several investigators reported that 8-epi-PGF2α is a predictor of glycemic control and oxidation status in patients with type 2 diabetes[52] and a reliable marker of IGT[53]. In the present study, we observed that 8-epi-PGF2α levels were significantly decreased in the test group. Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation reduced oxidative stress in subjects with IFG, IGT, or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Close interrelationships between changes of glucose and MDA were demonstrated in the present study despite the lack of differences in MDA levels between the placebo and test groups as well as no significant changes after the 12-week intervention. MDA is a primary biomarker of free radical-mediated lipid damage and oxidative stress and is elevated in type 2 diabetes patients[54-56]. This previous finding could explain the positive correlation between Δ glucose and Δ MDA in the test group of this study, indicating that lipid peroxidation was related to glycemic control and was affected by Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation. The present results indicate that inulin in Jerusalem artichoke and isoflavonoids in fermented soybeans might complementarily affect glucose control, and Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation could ameliorate existing oxidative stress in subjects with IFG, IGT, or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. There are several limitations of our study design. First, we specifically focused on Korean subjects with IFG, IGT, or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Therefore, our data cannot be generalized to other ethnic groups or to severe type 2 diabetes patients. Second, the sample size is relatively small; thus, the results should be interpreted with caution. Third, the levels of any inflammatory, antioxidant, or HDL markers that may affect or be associated with the results of this study were not measured. Finally, we did not assess the dose-dependent effects of the test product; thus, the effects of various doses of the test product should be verified through further studies. Despite these limitations, Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture supplementation exhibited antidiabetic and antioxidant effects. In conclusion, the consumption of a Jerusalem artichoke and fermented soybean powder mixture for 12 weeks was effective for reducing PPG and oxidative stress level, particularly 8-epi-PGF2α, in subjects with IFG, IGT, or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Table S1
  53 in total

1.  Antioxidant action and potential antidiabetic properties of an isoflavonoid-containing soyabean phytochemical extract (SPE).

Authors:  K Vedavanam; S Srijayanta; J O'Reilly; A Raman; H Wiseman
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.878

2.  Prebiotic potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in Wistar rats: effects of levels of supplementation on hindgut fermentation, intestinal morphology, blood metabolites and immune response.

Authors:  Lipismita Samal; Vishwa Bandhu Chaturvedi; Guttula Saikumar; Ramesh Somvanshi; Ashok Kumar Pattanaik
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.638

3.  Mechanism by which fatty acids inhibit insulin activation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1)-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in muscle.

Authors:  Chunli Yu; Yan Chen; Gary W Cline; Dongyan Zhang; Haihong Zong; Yanlin Wang; Raynald Bergeron; Jason K Kim; Samuel W Cushman; Gregory J Cooney; Bronwyn Atcheson; Morris F White; Edward W Kraegen; Gerald I Shulman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The effect of enriched chicory inulin on liver enzymes, calcium homeostasis and hematological parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Ahmad Zare Javid; Parvin Dehghan
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  Antidiabetic effects of fermented soybean products on type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Dae Young Kwon; James W Daily; Hyun Jin Kim; Sunmin Park
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Oxidative stress and stress-activated signaling pathways: a unifying hypothesis of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joseph L Evans; Ira D Goldfine; Betty A Maddux; Gerold M Grodsky
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Mechanism of Generation of Oxidative Stress and Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: How Are They Interlinked?

Authors:  Kanwal Rehman; Muhammad Sajid Hamid Akash
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.429

8.  Beneficial effects of soluble dietary Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) in the prevention of the onset of type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in high-fructose diet-fed rats.

Authors:  Wan-Ching Chang; Huijuan Jia; Wanping Aw; Kenji Saito; Sumio Hasegawa; Hisanori Kato
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Impaired fasting glucose, blood pressure and cardiovascular disease mortality.

Authors:  Patrick Henry; Frédérique Thomas; Athanase Benetos; Louis Guize
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Natto and viscous vegetables in a Japanese style meal suppress postprandial glucose and insulin responses.

Authors:  Akiko Taniguchi; Hisami Yamanaka-Okumura; Yuka Nishida; Hironori Yamamoto; Yutaka Taketani; Eiji Takeda
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.662

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Medicinal Plants and Phytochemicals Regulating Insulin Resistance and Glucose Homeostasis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Atena Mahdavi; Mohammad Bagherniya; Mohammad Sadegh Mirenayat; Stephen L Atkin; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  The Promising Role of Microbiome Therapy on Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic and Narrative Review.

Authors:  Pradipta Paul; Ridhima Kaul; Basma Abdellatif; Maryam Arabi; Rohit Upadhyay; Reya Saliba; Majda Sebah; Ali Chaari
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Helianthus tuberosus L. Induces Anti-Diabetic, and Wound-Healing Activities in Insulin-Resistant Human Liver Cancer and Mouse Fibroblast Cells.

Authors:  Arokia Vijaya Anand Mariadoss; SeonJu Park; Kandasamy Saravanakumar; Anbazhagan Sathiyaseelan; Myeong-Hyeon Wang
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-12

4.  Administration of Jerusalem artichoke reduces the postprandial plasma glucose and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) concentrations in humans.

Authors:  Hirokazu Takahashi; Akane Nakajima; Yuichi Matsumoto; Hitoe Mori; Kanako Inoue; Hiroko Yamanouchi; Kenichi Tanaka; Yuki Tomiga; Maki Miyahara; Tomomi Yada; Yumiko Iba; Yayoi Matsuda; Keiichi Watanabe; Keizo Anzai
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Anti-hypertensive Effects of Artichoke Supplementation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Amini; Fatemeh Sheikhhossein; Mohsen Alvani; Seyyed Morteza Seyyed Shoura; Asma Sohrabnavi; Ehsan Heidarian; Azita Hekmatdoost
Journal:  Clin Nutr Res       Date:  2022-07-26

6.  Effect of Dietary Supplementation with a Natural Extract of Sclerocarya birrea on Glycemic Metabolism in Subjects with Prediabetes: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Desirée Victoria-Montesinos; Maravillas Sánchez-Macarro; José Antonio Gabaldón-Hernández; María Salud Abellán-Ruiz; María Querol-Calderón; Antonio J Luque-Rubia; Enrique Bernal-Morell; Vicente Ávila-Gandía; Francisco Javier López-Román
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Heliangin from Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) Leaves Might Prevent Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Papawee Saiki; Mizuki Yoshihara; Yasuhiro Kawano; Hitoshi Miyazaki; Koyomi Miyazaki
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Adiponectin and 8-epi-PGF as intermediate influencing factors in weight reduction after legume consumption: a 12-week randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Youngmin Han; A Ram Kim; Jong Ho Lee; Minjoo Kim
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.718

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.