| Literature DB >> 30023322 |
Behnoush Hossein-Nia1, Sirous Khorram2, Hassan Rezazadeh3, Abdolrasol Safaiyan4, Rafigheh Ghiasi5, Ali Tarighat-Esfanjani6.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effect of natural clinoptilolite (CLN) and nano-sized clinoptilolite (NCLN) on lipid profile, food intakes (FI) and weight changes in streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Body weight; Diabetes Mellitus; Lipoproteins; Rats; Zeolites
Year: 2018 PMID: 30023322 PMCID: PMC6046415 DOI: 10.15171/apb.2018.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharm Bull ISSN: 2228-5881
Elemental composition of clinoptilolite and nano-sized clinoptilolite
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3.58 | 7.07 | 60.33 | 0.72 | 8.28 | 1.25 | 0.15 |
|
| 8.86 | 4.81 | 44.27 | 10.94 | 8.88 | 4.52 | 3.23 |
CLN= clinoptilolite; NCLN= nano-sized clinoptilolite; Na=Sodium; Al=Aluminium; Si= Silicon; K=Potassium
Adapted with permission from Table 2 in "Khataee, A., Bozorg, S., Khorram, S., Fathinia, M., Hanifehpour, Y., & Joo, S. W. (2013). Conversion of natural clinoptilolite microparticles to nanorods by glow discharge plasma: a novel Fe-impregnated nanocatalyst for the heterogeneous Fenton process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(51), 18225-18233."
Effect of CLN and NCLN on body weight in STZ-treated Diabetic Rats
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Control | 316.2±10.56 | 315.2±89.00 | 316.2±11.17 | 308.3±14.12 | 330.2±93.92 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| CLN | 324.3±12.42 | 322.5±12.75 | 337.8±11.58 | 347.6±11.48 | 349.8±10.86 | |||||
| NCLN | 332.6±12.29 | 308.5±11.31 | 339.8±15.07 | 335.8±14.17 | 340.0±14.50 | |||||
|
| Control | 302.6±10.05* | 306.3±15.97 | 247.0±80.82 | 239.0±40.41* | 238.5±95.26 | ||||
| CLN | 323.3±11.72 | 299.8±12.31* | 280.1±14.70* | 260.0±14.88 | 270.0±94.81 | |||||
| NCLN | 312.1±13.18 | 325.0±76.68 | 268.3±13.15* | 265.0±13.99* | 270.8±14.88* | |||||
Data are expressed in terms of means ±SEM.; CLN= Clinoptilolite; NCLN= Nano-sized clinoptilolite, *Sidak tests p<0.05 compared to group 2 and time 28
Figure 1Effects of CLN and NCLN on lipid profile in STZ-treated Diabetic Rats
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TG (mg/dL) | 46.8±8.66 | 54.1±3.40 | 66.8±4.26 | 51.6±11.51 | 49.3±11.08 | 58.0±4.78 | 0.656 | 0.232 | 0.681 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 67.2±3.61 | 65.6±1.28 | 66.6±4.82 | 53.3±4.75 | 62.1±7.21 | 69.3±2.64 | 0.189 | 0.239 | 0.191 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 27.6±4.09 | 27.5±2.12 | 22.5±4.51 | 17±1.86 | 22.9±2.79 | 27.9±1.66* | 0.199 | 0.552 | 0.042 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 30.2±1.19 | 27.3±0.84 | 28.8±0.91 | 26±3.12 | 28.5±2.39 | 29.8±1.62 | 0.661 | 0.715 | 0.28 |
Data are expressed in terms of means ±SEM; TG: Triglyceride; TC: Total cholesterol; LDL: Low density lipoprotein; HDL: High density lipoprotein; N:Normal rats, CLN: Clinoptilolite; NCLN: Nano-sized clinoptilolite, ANOVA followed by Post-Hoc and Sidak tests. * p<0.05 compared to group 4; Pα: diabetes, Pβ: group, Pθ: interactio