| Literature DB >> 23847458 |
C O Eleazu1, M Iroaganachi, P N Okafor, I I Ijeh, K C Eleazu.
Abstract
The ameliorating potentials of ginger incorporated feed (10%) on the relative organ weights of Streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats was investigated. The experiment lasted for three weeks. Results show that administration of 10% ginger feed to the diabetic rats of group 3, resulted in a 29.81% decrease in their resulting hyperglycemia with a corresponding amelioration of elevated urinary protein, sugars, specific gravity as well as renal growth. In addition, administration of the ginger incorporated feeds to the diabetic rats of group 3, resulted in 9.88% increase in body weight with a corresponding 60.24% increase in growth compared with the non-diabetic rats administered standard rat pellets that had 6.21% increase in weight with a corresponding 60.14% increase in growth unlike the diabetic control rats that recorded 28.62% decrease in body weight with a corresponding 239.9% decrease in growth rates. Analysis of the chemical composition of the flour of the ginger incorporated feed indicated that it contained moderate amounts of moisture, crude fibre, alkaloids, saponins, tannins, Fe and Zn but considerable amounts of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, ash, flavonoids, calcium, magnesium, potassium, phosphorous and energy value. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the liver and relative liver weights of the diabetic control rats and the diabetic -ginger treated rats. In addition, there were no significant differences in the kidney weights of the non-diabetic, diabetic control and diabetic treated rats (P>0.05) while there were significant differences in the relative kidney weights of the non-diabetic rats and the diabetic rats treated with ginger feeds (P<0.05). Results show that the use of ginger in the dietary management of diabetes mellitus could be a breakthrough in the search for novel plants that could prevent the development of diabetic glomerular hypertrophy.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; experimentation; incorporated feeds; rats; streptozotocin
Year: 2013 PMID: 23847458 PMCID: PMC3708272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1550-9702
Fasting blood glucose of diabetic and non-diabetic rats (mg/dl)
| WeeK 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | PC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 70.67 ± 10.60 | 87.00 ± 7.55 | 92.00 ± 8.00 | 93.67 ± 8.50 | -7.67 (increase) |
| Group 2 | 104.00 ± 13.28 | 352.67 ± 150.88 | 355.00 ± 150.95 | 308.00 ± 54.88 | 12.67 (decrease) |
| Group 3 | 87.00 ± 7.94 | 312.00 ± 48.08 | 168.50 ± 58.69 | 219.50 ± 111.01 | 29.81 (decrease) |
Values are presented as means ± SD. n=6; PC, Percentage change in fasting blood glucose calculated from week 1;
P>0.05 in comparison with diabetic control within the group;
P<0.05 in comparison with normal control within the group;
P<0.05 in comparison with diabetic control within the group.
Biochemical parameters in the urine of diabetic and non-diabetic rats
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Glucose: -ve | -ve | -ve | -ve |
| Protein: Nil | Trace | Trace | Trace | |
| SPGR: 1.015 to 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 to 1.025 | 1.02 to 1.025 | |
| Group 2 | Glucose: -ve | Trace to 2+ | Trace to 2+ | 2+ |
| Protein: Nil | 100 mg/dl | 100 to 300 mg/dl | 100 to 300 mg/dl | |
| SPGR: 1.03 | 1.06 to 1.07 | 1.03 to 1.04 | 1.025 to 1.03 | |
| Group 3 | Glucose: Nil | Trace to + | -ve to 2+ | -ve to trace |
| Protein: Trace | 30 to 100 mg/dl | 30 to 100 mg/dl | Nil to 30 mg/dl | |
| SRGR: 1.02 to 1.025 | 1.05 to 1.07 | 1.04 to 1.07 | 1.02 to 1.06 | |
-ve, negative or absent; +, positive or present.
Organ weights and relative organ weights of diabetic and non-diabetic rats
| Liver weight (g) | Kidney weight (g) | Relative liver weight (g/100 g) | Relative kidney weight (g/100 g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Control) | 5.83 ± 0.30 | 1.33 ± 0.33 | 2.72 ± 0.16 | 0.61 ± 0.11 |
| Group 2 | 4.57 ± 0.32 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 3.70 ± 0.4 | 1.02 ± 0.06 |
| Group 3 | 4.95 ± 0.21 | 1.30 ± 0.28 | 3.52 ± 0.02 | 0.92 ± 0.18 |
Values are presented as means ± SD. n=6;
P<0.05 in comparison with normal control within the groups (column);
P<0.05 in comparison with diabetic control;
P>0.05 in comparison with normal control within the group.
Body weights of non-diabetic and diabetic rats (g)
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | PC (%) | PG (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 208.37 ± 20.74 | 203.47 ± 19146 | 205.30 ± 20.19 | 216.10 ± 21.86 | -6.21 (increase) | 60.14 (i/c) |
| Group 2 | 194.67 ± 9.40 | 175.97 ± 5.35 | 144.90 ± 10.57 | 125.60 ± 20.69 | 28.62 (decrease) | -239.9 (d/c) |
| Group 3 | 140.35 ± 10.54 | 128.10 ± 7.35 | 124.50 ± 1.56 | 140.75 ± 6.58 | -9.88 (increase) | 60.24 (i/c) |
Values are presented as means ± SD. n=6; PC, Percentage change in weight calculated from week 1; PG, Percentage Growth Rate; i/c, Increase; d/c, decrease.
P<0.05 versus normal control within the column;
P>0.05 vs diabetic control within the groups (column).
Feed intake of rats (g/week)
| Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 112.50 ± 2.59 | 108.13 ± 6.91 | 117.73 ± 9.45 | 118.33 ± 7.36 |
| Group 2 | 115.78 ± 1.41 | 95.37 ± 2.44 | 108.70 ± 3.20 | 116.22 ± 2.88 |
| Group 3 | 86.05 ± 4.60 | 85.15 ± 0.21 | 65.15 ± 2.62 | 86.85 ± 0.35 |
Values are presented as means ± SD. n = 6;
P<0.05 in comparison with diabetic control;
P>0.05 in comparison with normal control within the groups (column);
P<0.05 in comparison with normal control;
P<0.05 in comparison with normal control within the groups (column).
Proximate composition of ginger incorporated feed (%)
| Parameter | MC | Ash | CF | Lipid | Crude protein | Carbohydrate | Energy value (Kcal/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginger | 3.48 ± 0.10 | 21.67 ± 0.05 | 1.52 ± 0.20 | 21.48 ± 0.00 | 10.25 ± 0.01 | 43.13 ± 0.06 | 406.82 ± 0.20 |
MC, Moisture content; CF, Crude fibre.
Free radical scavenging activities of the methanolic/ethanolic extracts of ginger incorporated feed using Rapid DPPH TLC screening
| Plant | Antioxidant activity | Intensity of spots |
|---|---|---|
| Ginger | Strong | +++ |
| Quercetin | Strong | +++ |
The degree of activity, determined qualitatively from the observation of the yellow colour intensity: strong (+++).
Figure 1Mineral composition of ginger incorporated feed.
Figure 2Phytochemical composition of ginger incorporated feed.