| Literature DB >> 30018894 |
Abstract
The seed of Cassia hirsutta was subjected to aqueous soaking and four hydrothermal processing techniques (atmospheric boiling, atmospheric steaming, pressure boiling, and pressure steaming). Soaking of the seed to varying hydration levels before hydrothermal treatments induced the reduction in the concentration of the antinutritional components. The lowest concentration of each of the antinutritional components was observed at 100% hydration level. The effects of hydrothermal techniques on the antinutritional components and protein digestibility were investigated. All the hydrothermal techniques caused significant reduction (P<0.05) in the antinutritional components. Boiling at elevated pressure resulted in greater reduction of antinutrients. The hydrothermal techniques caused total elimination of trypsin inhibitor activity. Reduction in the concentration of the antinutritional components after hydrothermal processing led to the increase in in vitro protein digestibility. The highest in vitro protein digestibility of 86.82% was observed after the legume seed was boiled at elevated pressure. Adoption of this underutilised legume will strengthen dietary diversity, improve feeding patterns, and prevent protein energy malnutrition especially in developing countries since the seed is a good source of nutritionally important nutrients.Entities:
Keywords: Cassia hirsutta; antinutrients; hydrothermal techniques; underutilised legume
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018894 PMCID: PMC6047873 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2018.23.2.152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Fig. 1Cassia hirsutta (Sese omode).
Fig. 2Water absorption curve for Cassia hirsutta.
Concentration of antinutritional components in Cassia hirsutta before and after soaking at varying hydration levels (mg/g)
| Antinutritional components | Hydration levels (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 0 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
| Phytic acid | 56.26±0.18f | 55.85±0.20e | 55.07±0.15d | 54.81±0.31c | 52.89±0.05b | 52.77±0.08a |
| (0.73) | (2.12) | (2.58) | (5.99) | (6.20) | ||
| Saponin | 5.11±0.21d | 5.11±0.66d | 5.06±0.00c | 4.98±0.42b | 4.89±0.71a | 4.89±0.80a |
| (0.00) | (0.98) | (2.54) | (4.30) | (4.30) | ||
| Trypsin inhibitor activity | 10.88±0.14e | 10.88±0.30e | 10.21±0.10d | 10.08±0.10c | 9.67±0.04b | 9.35±0.02a |
| (0.00) | (6.16) | (7.35) | (11.12) | (14.06) | ||
| Tanin | 27.47±0.44f | 26.50±0.12e | 26.37±0.21d | 26.12±0.03c | 24.70±0.10b | 23.68±0.11a |
| (3.53) | (4.00) | (4.91) | (10.08) | (13.79) | ||
Data are mean±standard deviation (n=3) on dry basis.
Means with different letters (a–f) in the same row are significantly different (P<0.05).
Values in parenthesis represent the percentage loss.
Antinutritional components of Cassia hirsutta as influenced by hydrothermal processing techniques (mg/g)
| Antinutritional components | Processing conditions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| RS | BAP | SAP | BEP | SEP | |
| Phytic acid | 56.26±0.18d | 21.30±0.23a | 24.75±0.44b | 24.06±0.11b | 25.81±0.26c |
| (62.14) | (56.01) | (57.23) | (54.12) | ||
| Saponin | 5.11±0.28c | 0.87±0.01a | 0.97±0.00b | 0.97±0.00b | 0.97±0.08b |
| (82.97) | (81.02) | (81.02) | (81.02) | ||
| Trypsin inhibitor activity | 10.88±0.14b | 0.00±0.00a | 0.00±0.00a | 0.00±0.00a | 0.00±0.00a |
| (100.00) | (100.00) | (100.00) | (100.00) | ||
| Tanin | 62.31±0.37d | 13.42±0.33a | 15.38±0.32b | 13.42±0.61a | 16.67±0.80c |
| (78.46) | (75.32) | (78.46) | (73.25) | ||
Data are means±standard deviation (n=3) on dry basis.
Means with different letters (a–d) in the same row are significantly different (P<0.05).
Values in parenthesis represent % decrease.
RS, raw dried sample; BAP, boiling at normal atmospheric pressure; SAP, steaming at normal atmospheric pressure; BEP, boiling at elevated pressure; SEP, steaming at elevated pressure.
In vitro multienzyme protein digestibility of Cassia hirsutta before and after hydrothermal processing
| Processing method | 10 min | 15 min | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| pH | % Digestibility | pH | % Digestibility | |
| RS | 9.23 | 43.37±0.09a | 9.17 | 44.46±0.03a |
| BAP | 6.85 | 86.46±0.11d | 6.83 | 86.82±0.03e |
| (99.35) | (95.28) | |||
| SAP | 6.94 | 84.83±0.09c | 6.93 | 85.01±0.03c |
| (95.60) | (91.21) | |||
| BEP | 6.93 | 85.01±0.01c | 6.91 | 85.37±0.06d |
| (96.01) | (92.02) | |||
| SEP | 6.97 | 84.29±0.13b | 6.95 | 84.65±0.42b |
| (94.35) | (90.40) | |||
Data are means±standard deviation (n=3) on dry basis.
Means with different letters (a–e) in the same column are significantly different (P<0.05).
Values in parenthesis represent % increase in digestibility.
RS, raw dried sample; BAP, boiling at normal atmospheric pressure; SAP, steaming at normal atmospheric pressure; BEP, boiling at elevated pressure; SEP, steaming at elevated pressure.