| Literature DB >> 35465118 |
Abstract
Tannins, water-soluble phenolic compounds, have been reported to have the ability to form complexes with nutritionally important nutrients such as protein and mineral elements thereby making them unavailable for absorption and utilization. Toxicity of tannin has been demonstrated in experimental animals although no deleterious effect of ingestion of legume tannin on human physiology has been reported. This report highlights the processing effects of soaking and hydrothermal techniques on some underutilised hard-to-cook legume crops and the importance of tannin in legume nutrition. Soaking and hydrothermal processing reduce the tannin content of processed legume seeds and hence improve the availability of protein and mineral elements. In view of the recent findings of the health benefits, classification of tannin which is traditionally regarded as an antinutrient should be reconsidered. Provision of these information will enhance knowledge of legume nutrition and economic utility. Increasing consumption of underutilized nutritionally important legume seeds, it is hoped, will alleviate the problem of protein energy malnutrition in many developing nations.Entities:
Keywords: hydrothermal techniques; legume seeds; nutritional implication; tannin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35465118 PMCID: PMC9007702 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2022.27.1.14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Concentration of tannins in legume seeds before and after soaking at various hydration levels (unit: mg/g)
| Legume sample | Hydration level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 0 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
| 28.10±1.22f | 27.03±0.10e | 26.07±0.14d | 25.32±0.21c | 24.28±0.07b | 24.02±0.11a | |
| (3.81) | (7.22) | (9.89) | (13.59) | (14.52) | ||
|
| 62.31±0.37f | 61.93±0.51e | 61.37±0.42d | 60.17±0.22c | 59.48±0.60b | 56.87±0.50a |
| (0.61) | (1.51) | (3.43) | (4.54) | (8.73) | ||
|
| 27.47±0.44f | 26.50±0.12e | 26.37±0.21d | 26.12±0.03c | 24.70±0.10b | 23.68±0.11a |
| (3.53) | (4.00) | (4.91) | (10.08) | (13.79) | ||
| 31.58±0.31f | 30.20±0.13e | 28.88±0.24d | 26.72±0.17c | 25.87±0.25b | 25.41±0.10a | |
| (4.36) | (8.55) | (15.39) | (18.08) | (19.54) | ||
|
| 28.97±0.32e | 28.04±0.10d | 27.16±0.02c | 26.55±0.13b | 24.47±0.24a | 24.47±0.24a |
| (3.21) | (6.25) | (8.35) | (15.53) | (15.53) | ||
| 38.87±0.41f | 36.42±0.21e | 35.26±0.32d | 34.87±0.24c | 34.23±0.10b | 33.08±0.12a | |
| (6.30) | (9.29) | (10.29) | (11.94) | (14.89) | ||
| 42.59±0.53e | 40.08±0.12d | 38.14±0.10c | 37.52±0.30b | 37.34±0.21a | 37.34±0.21a | |
| (5.89) | (10.45) | (11.90) | (12.33) | (12.33) | ||
|
| 39.88±0.24e | 38.24±0.21d | 37.06±0.10c | 34.35±0.22b | 34.18±0.30a | 34.18±0.20a |
| (4.11) | (7.07) | (13.87) | (14.29) | (14.29) | ||
Values are presented as mean±SD (n=3) on dry basis and values in parentheses represent the percentage loss.
Different letters (a-f) in the same row indicate significant differences (P<0.05).
Data from the article of Ojo (2015), Ojo et al. (2017a), and Ojo et al. (2018).
Tannin content of legume seeds as influenced by hydrothermal processing techniques (unit: mg/g)
| Legume sample | Processing condition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Raw dried sample | Atmospheric boiling | Atmospheric steaming | Pressure boiling | Pressure steaming | |
| 28.10±0.22e | 6.85±0.32a | 7.84±0.40c | 7.57±0.05b | 8.15±0.13c | |
| (75.62) | (72.10) | (73.06) | (70.99) | ||
|
| 62.31±0.37d | 13.42±0.33a | 15.38±0.32b | 13.42±0.61a | 16.67±0.80c |
| (78.46) | (75.32) | (78.46) | (73.25) | ||
|
| 27.47±0.44d | 9.70±0.41a | 10.60±0.34c | 10.03±0.20b | 10.64±0.32c |
| (64.69) | (61.41) | (63.49) | (61.27) | ||
| 31.58±0.31d | 11.49±0.24a | 12.82±0.31b | 12.31±0.57b | 13.19±0.60c | |
| (63.62) | (59.40) | (61.02) | (58.23) | ||
|
| 28.97±0.32c | 9.02±0.13a | 10.15±0.21b | 9.38±0.34a | 10.13±0.42c |
| (68.86) | (64.96) | (67.62) | (65.03) | ||
| 38.87±0.41c | 9.20±0.18a | 10.74±0.52b | 9.61±0.29a | 10.77±0.61b | |
| (76.33) | (72.37) | (75.28) | (72.29) | ||
| 42.59±0.53 | 14.57±0.57a | 16.13±0.60b | 15.20±0.70a | 16.16±0.42b | |
| (65.79) | (62.13) | (64.34) | (62.06) | ||
|
| 39.88±0.24d | 10.07±0.15a | 11.76±0.23b | 11.01±0.40b | 11.93±0.37c |
| (74.75) | (70.51) | (72.39) | (70.09) | ||
Values are the mean±standard deviation (n=3) on dry basis and values in parentheses represent the percentage loss.
Different letters (a-e) in the same row represent significant differences (P<0.05).
Data from the article of Ojo (2015), Ojo et al. (2017a), and Ojo et al. (2018).