Literature DB >> 30017307

The influence of payor status on outcomes associated with surgical repair of upper gastrointestinal perforations due to peptic ulcer disease in the United States.

Vijaya T Daniel1, Didem Ayturk2, Doyle V Ward3, Beth A McCormick3, Heena P Santry4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An association between lack of insurance and inferior outcomes has been well described for a number of surgical emergencies, yet little is known about the relationship of payor status and outcomes of patients undergoing emergent surgical repair for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) perforations. We evaluated the association of payor status and in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing emergency surgery for UGI perforations in the United States.
METHODS: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients between 18 and 64 years of age who underwent emergent (open or laparoscopic) repair for UGI perforations secondary to peptic ulcer disease (2010-2014). Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major and minor postoperative complications. The main predictor outcome was insurance status (Private, Medicaid, Uninsured). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Data were weighted to provide national estimates.
RESULTS: 21,005 patients underwent surgical repair for UGI perforations. Patients with private insurance represented the largest payor group (47%). After adjustment of other factors, payor status was not a statistically significant predictor of in-hospital mortality (Medicaid vs. Private: [OR] 1.1; 95% [CI] 0.67-1.81; Uninsured vs. Private: OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.52-1.61). However, payor status remained a statistically significant predictor of major postoperative complications (Medicaid vs. Private [OR] 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.8; Uninsured vs. Private [OR]1.2, 95% CI 0.9, 1.5) and minor postoperative complications (Medicaid vs. Private [OR] 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.9; Uninsured vs. Private [OR]1.2, 95% CI 0.9, 1.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for UGI perforations is associated with high mortality and morbidity across all payor classes; however, Medicaid is a predictor for both major and minor postoperative complications. Preventing perforation through preventative measures will be key to reducing the burden of peptic ulcer disease across all populations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency general surgery; Insurance; Outcomes; Peptic ulcer disease; Upper gastrointestinal perforations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30017307      PMCID: PMC6889867          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Primary payer status affects mortality for major surgical operations.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Carlos M Mery; George J Stukenborg; David R Jones; Bruce D Schirmer; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Worse outcomes among uninsured general surgery patients: does the need for an emergency operation explain these disparities?

Authors:  Diane A Schwartz; Xuan Hui; Eric B Schneider; Mays T Ali; Joseph K Canner; William R Leeper; David T Efron; Elliot Haut; Elliot R Haut; Catherine G Velopulos; Timothy M Pawlik; Adil H Haider
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Impact of Type of Health Insurance on Infection Rates among Young Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Jaswin S Sawhney; Andrew H Stephen; Hector Nunez; Stephanie N Lueckel; Tareq Kheirbek; Charles A Adams; William G Cioffi; Daithi S Heffernan
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think.

Authors:  George A Sarosi; Kshama R Jaiswal; Fiemu E Nwariaku; Massiamo Asolati; Jason B Fleming; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006.

Authors:  Y Richard Wang; Joel E Richter; Daniel T Dempsey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The effect of insurance status on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samantha J Neureuther; Kamal Nagpal; Arieh Greenbaum; John M Cosgrove; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Payer status is related to differences in access and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States.

Authors:  Leslie K Boxer; Justin B Dimick; Reid M Wainess; John A Cowan; Peter K Henke; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Disparities in mortality after blunt injury: does insurance type matter?

Authors:  Paul Logan Weygandt; Lia I Losonczy; Eric B Schneider; Mehreen T Kisat; Lauren K Licatino; Edward E Cornwell; Elliot R Haut; David T Efron; Adil H Haider
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Perforated appendix with abscess: Immediate or interval appendectomy? Some examples to explain our choice.

Authors:  Edoardo Guida; Federica Pederiva; Massimo Di Grazia; Daniela Codrich; Maria Antonietta Lembo; Maria Grazia Scarpa; Waifro Rigamonti
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Payer type does not impact patient-reported outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James E Feng; Jonathan A Gabor; Afshin A Anoushiravani; William J Long; Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Patrick A Meere; Richard Iorio; Ran Schwarzkopf; William Macaulay
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-01-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.