Literature DB >> 20009753

Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006.

Y Richard Wang1, Joel E Richter, Daniel T Dempsey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite progress in diagnosis and treatment, peptic ulcer disease (PUD) remains a common reason for hospitalization and operation. The purpose of this study was to quantify the time trends of hospitalizations and operations for PUD in the United States (US) since 1993. DATA AND METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample is a 20% stratified sample of all hospitalizations in the United States. It was used to study hospitalizations with PUD as the principal diagnosis during 1993 to 2006, including details on ulcer site, complications, procedures, and mortality. Statistical methods included the chi test and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: The national estimate of hospitalizations for PUD decreased significantly from 222,601 in 1993 to 156,108 in 2006 (-29.9%), with a larger reduction in duodenal ulcers (95,552 in 1993 vs. 60,029 in 2006, -37.2%) than gastric ulcers (106,987 in 1993 vs. 86,064 in 2006, -19.6%). The inpatient mortality rate of PUD decreased from 3.8% to 2.7% during 1993 to 2006 (P < 0.001). Hemorrhage remained the most common complication (71.6% in 1993; 73.3% in 2006) but perforation had the highest mortality (15.1% in 1993; 10.6% in 2006). In comparison to 1993, patients hospitalized for PUD in 2006 more frequently had endoscopic treatment to control bleeding (12.9% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001), similar use of surgical oversewing of ulcer (7.6% vs. 7.4%), less use of gastrectomy (4.4% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001), and less use of vagotomy (5.7% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regressions, the determinants of mortality were similar in 1993 and 2006.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for PUD decreased in the United States from 1993 to 2006, suggesting a decrease in the prevalence and/or severity of ulcer complications over this recent time period. Despite increased patient age and comorbidities, there has been a significant decrease in PUD mortality, a significant increase in the use of therapeutic endoscopy for bleeding ulcer, and a significant decrease in the use of definitive surgery (vagotomy or resection) for ulcer complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20009753     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b975b8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  53 in total

1.  Trends in Major Gastrectomy for Cancer: Frequency and Outcomes.

Authors:  Eric M Groh; Noorie Hyun; David Check; Theo Heller; R Taylor Ripley; Jonathan M Hernandez; Barry I Graubard; Jeremy L Davis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Chronic subclinical perforation of a duodenal ulcer presenting with an abdominal abscess in a patient with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Awais Ashfaq; Alyssa B Chapital
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-06

Review 3.  Emergency ulcer surgery.

Authors:  Constance W Lee; George A Sarosi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  The natural history of perforated foregut ulcers after repair by omental patching or primary closure.

Authors:  D Smith; M Roeser; J Naranjo; J A Carr
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Laparoscopic approach in gastrointestinal emergencies.

Authors:  Rosa M Jimenez Rodriguez; Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Mercedes Flores-Cortés; Francisco López-Bernal; Cristobalina Martín; Verónica Pino Diaz; Felipe Pareja Ciuro; Javier Padillo Ruiz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Upper Gastrointestinal Perforations: A Possible Danger of Antibiotic Overuse.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Stephanie Francalancia; Nili S Amir; M Didem Ayturk; Stacy B Sanders; Jonathan R Wisler; Courtney E Collins; Doyle V Ward; Catarina I Kiefe; Beth A McCormick; Heena P Santry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Community-based evaluation of laparoscopic versus open simple closure of perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Surgery for Peptic Ulcer Disease in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review of Published Data.

Authors:  Jennifer Rickard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Comorbidity in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Peter Jepsen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.