Literature DB >> 20647910

Primary payer status affects mortality for major surgical operations.

Damien J LaPar1, Castigliano M Bhamidipati, Carlos M Mery, George J Stukenborg, David R Jones, Bruce D Schirmer, Irving L Kron, Gorav Ailawadi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Medicaid and Uninsured populations are a significant focus of current healthcare reform. We hypothesized that outcomes following major surgical operations in the United States is dependent on primary payer status.
METHODS: From 2003 to 2007, 893,658 major surgical operations were evaluated using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database: lung resection, esophagectomy, colectomy, pancreatectomy, gastrectomy, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass. Patients were stratified by primary payer status: Medicare (n = 491,829), Medicaid (n = 40,259), Private Insurance (n = 337,535), and Uninsured (n = 24,035). Multivariate regression models were applied to assess outcomes.
RESULTS: Unadjusted mortality for Medicare (4.4%; odds ratio [OR], 3.51), Medicaid (3.7%; OR, 2.86), and Uninsured (3.2%; OR, 2.51) patient groups were higher compared to Private Insurance groups (1.3%, P < 0.001). Mortality was lowest for Private Insurance patients independent of operation. After controlling for age, gender, income, geographic region, operation, and 30 comorbid conditions, Medicaid payer status was associated with the longest length of stay and highest total costs (P < 0.001). Medicaid (P < 0.001) and Uninsured (P < 0.001) payer status independently conferred the highest adjusted risks of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid and Uninsured payer status confers increased risk-adjusted mortality. Medicaid was further associated with the greatest adjusted length of stay and total costs despite risk factors or operation. These differences serve as an important proxy for larger socioeconomic and health system-related issues that could be targeted to improve surgical outcomes for US Patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647910      PMCID: PMC3071622          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e8fd75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

Review 1.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Medicaid policy and the substitution of hospital outpatient care for physician care.

Authors:  J W Cohen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalizations.

Authors:  G J Stukenborg; D P Wagner; A F Connors
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; N Pal; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Racial, socioeconomic, and rural-urban disparities in obesity-related bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Amy E Wallace; Yinong Young-Xu; David Hartley; William B Weeks
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Payer status is related to differences in access and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States.

Authors:  Leslie K Boxer; Justin B Dimick; Reid M Wainess; John A Cowan; Peter K Henke; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Lack of insurance negatively affects trauma mortality in US children.

Authors:  Heather Rosen; Fady Saleh; Stuart R Lipsitz; John G Meara; Selwyn O Rogers
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Does insurance status matter at a public, level I trauma center?

Authors:  Ali Salim; Marcus Ottochian; Joseph DuBose; Kenji Inaba; Pedro Teixeira; Linda S Chan; Daniel R Margulies
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-01
View more
  84 in total

1.  Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.

Authors:  John S Mayo; Miriam L Brazer; Kenneth J Bogenberger; Kelli B Tavares; Robert J Conrad; Michael B Lustik; Suzanne M Gillern; Chan W Park; Carly R Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Jay Jhaveri; Maxine Sun; Khurshid R Ghani; Jan Schmitges; Wooju Jeong; James O Peabody; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mani Menon
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04

3.  Differences in the rates of patient safety events by payer: implications for providers and policymakers.

Authors:  Christine S Spencer; Eric T Roberts; Darrell J Gaskin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Correlation Between the Increased Hospital Volume and Decreased Overall Perioperative Mortality in One Universal Health Care System.

Authors:  Jin-Ming Wu; Te-Wei Ho; Yu-Wen Tien
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  National Incidence of Patient Safety Indicators in the Total Hip Arthroplasty Population.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Derrick M Knapik; Glenn D Wera; Steven J Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Disparities in reportable quality metrics by insurance status in the primary spine neoplasm population.

Authors:  Syed K Mehdi; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Vincent J Alentado; Jacob A Miller; Daniel Lubelski; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Characterizing Short-Term Outcomes Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer: the Role of Race and Insurance Status.

Authors:  Sook Y Chan; Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Rachelle N Damle; Jennifer S Davids; Paul R Sturrock; W Brian Sweeney; Justin A Maykel; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Anticipating the effects of Medicaid expansion on surgical care.

Authors:  Seth A Waits; Bradley N Reames; Kyle H Sheetz; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  The effect of insurance status on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samantha J Neureuther; Kamal Nagpal; Arieh Greenbaum; John M Cosgrove; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Surgical site infection in hand surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Na Lu; Sebastian Unizony; Hyon K Choi; David Ring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.