Literature DB >> 16226957

Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think.

George A Sarosi1, Kshama R Jaiswal, Fiemu E Nwariaku, Massiamo Asolati, Jason B Fleming, Thomas Anthony.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency of surgery for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has decreased dramatically during the last 3 decades. The purpose of this study was to characterize the Veteran patients undergoing surgery for peptic ulcer disease in a modern series and to examine the effect of H. pylori status on surgical outcome and recurrence of PUD.
METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing operations for peptic ulcer disease during a 66-month period at a single Veterans Administration medical center was performed. Patient records were examined for demographics, medication use, Helicobacter pylori status, operative details, and surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: From January 1999 to July 2004, 43 of 128 upper gastrointestinal operations were performed for PUD. Thirty-five operations (81%) were performed for bleeding or perforated ulcers, and 26 (60%) patients had no history of PUD. The mean age was 60 years, and 66% of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or 4; 47% were Helicobacter pylori positive, and 54% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medication. Hospital mortality was 23%. By univariate analysis, emergent surgery, higher ASA status, H. pylori status, and absence of a history of ulcer disease were risk factors for mortality (P <.05). Only 36% underwent definitive ulcer surgery. With a median follow-up of 18 months, there has been only 1 single recurrence (3%).
CONCLUSIONS: PUD still accounts for 33% of all gastroduodenal surgery performed in a Veterans Administration medical center. The majority of these operations are emergent operations in high-risk patients. In this era of effective acid suppression and H. pylori treatment, definitive ulcer surgery in the emergent setting may not be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226957     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  17 in total

1.  Trends in Major Gastrectomy for Cancer: Frequency and Outcomes.

Authors:  Eric M Groh; Noorie Hyun; David Check; Theo Heller; R Taylor Ripley; Jonathan M Hernandez; Barry I Graubard; Jeremy L Davis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Risk factors for gastrointestinal complications in aspirin users: review of clinical and experimental data.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Emergency ulcer surgery.

Authors:  Constance W Lee; George A Sarosi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Predicting the amount of intraperitoneal fluid accumulation by computed tomography and its clinical use in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Toru Ishiguro; Youichi Kumagai; Hiroyuki Baba; Yusuke Tajima; Hideko Imaizumi; Okihide Suzuki; Koki Kuwabara; Takeaki Matsuzawa; Jun Sobajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

5.  Upper Gastrointestinal Perforations: A Possible Danger of Antibiotic Overuse.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Stephanie Francalancia; Nili S Amir; M Didem Ayturk; Stacy B Sanders; Jonathan R Wisler; Courtney E Collins; Doyle V Ward; Catarina I Kiefe; Beth A McCormick; Heena P Santry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Is perforated marginal ulcer after the surgery of gastroduodenal ulcer associated with inadequate treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication?

Authors:  Bulent Aydinli; Omer Yilmaz; Gurkan Ozturk; M Ilhan Yildigan; Nesrin Gursan; Mahmut Basoglu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

8.  Predictors of mortality in the elderly after open repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Jason T Wiseman; Julie Flahive; Heena P Santry
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Eduardo A Bonin; Erica Moran; Christopher J Gostout; Andrea L McConico; Martin Zielinski; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The influence of payor status on outcomes associated with surgical repair of upper gastrointestinal perforations due to peptic ulcer disease in the United States.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Didem Ayturk; Doyle V Ward; Beth A McCormick; Heena P Santry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.