Literature DB >> 30014271

Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device "ICON" in trauma patients: a feasibility study.

Matthias Kuster1, Tobias Haltmeier1, Aristomenis Exadaktylos2, Beat Schnüriger3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Assessment of hemodynamics is crucial for the evaluation of major trauma patients. Cardiac output (CO) monitoring provides additional information and may improve volume resuscitation. The goal of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new non-invasive CO monitoring (NICOM) device in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: Single-center prospective observational pilot study including 20 trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center. CO was continuously monitored for 60 min after ED admission using the new NICOM device ICON®. This device measures changes of the thoracic bioimpedance to calculate CO. Conventional vital signs were recorded simultaneously. Feasibility, safety, reliability, user-friendliness, and impact of the device on standard ED procedures were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirteen (65%) patients were male, median age was 57.5 (IQR 25), and median ISS was 10.5 (IQR 14.8). Median CO over time was 9.8 l/min (IQR 4.6). No adverse effects were recorded. The device proved to be user-friendly with no negative impact on routine ED care. In four patients, detachment of electrodes was observed, and in four patients, the CO recording was temporary discontinued. Short-term changes of the CO were observed 44 times after the placement of electrodes and during patient transfers.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive CO monitoring proved to be feasible and safe for the initial hemodynamic evaluation of trauma patients. Problems with the NICOM device were detachment of electrodes and temporary signal loss. Due to the small sample size and relatively low injury burden of the patients included in this study, further prospective investigation is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Emergency department; Initial care; Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30014271     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-0984-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  24 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiologic principles and theory of stroke volume determination by thoracic electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  M J Osypka; D P Bernstein
Journal:  AACN Clin Issues       Date:  1999-08

2.  Emergency department noninvasive (NICOM) cardiac outputs are associated with trauma activation, patient injury severity and host conditions and mortality.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Thomas J Chirichella; Brian S Gruber; Jonathan P Ferrari; Joseph A Martin; Brenda A Luchs; Barbara M Hileman; Renee Merrell
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 3.  Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  David S Kauvar; Rolf Lefering; Charles E Wade
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-06

4.  Outcome prediction of emergency patients by noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  W C Shoemaker; C C Wo; L Chan; E Ramicone; E S Kamel; G C Velmahos; H Belzberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Is noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring appropriate for the elderly critically injured patient?

Authors:  Carlos V R Brown; William C Shoemaker; Charles C J Wo; Linda Chan; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-01

6.  Noninvasive cardiac index monitoring in gunshot wound victims.

Authors:  M H Bishop; W C Shoemaker; J Shuleshko; C C Wo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Multicenter study of noninvasive monitoring systems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients.

Authors:  W C Shoemaker; H Belzberg; C C Wo; D P Milzman; M D Pasquale; L Baga; M A Fuss; G J Fulda; K Yarbrough; J P Van DeWater; P J Ferraro; D Thangathurai; P Roffey; G Velmahos; J A Murray; J A Asensio; K ElTawil; W R Dougherty; M J Sullivan; R S Patil; J Adibi; C B James; D Demetriades
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  N Zoremba; J Bickenbach; B Krauss; R Rossaint; R Kuhlen; G Schälte
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.105

9.  Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in obese children and adolescents: comparison of electrical cardiometry and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Ralf Rauch; Eva Welisch; Nathan Lansdell; Elizabeth Burrill; Judy Jones; Tracy Robinson; Dirk Bock; Cheril Clarson; Guido Filler; Kambiz Norozi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization.

Authors:  Christos Chamos; Liana Vele; Mark Hamilton; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring and Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Children With Shock in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Pranali Awadhare; Radha Patel; Tracy McCallin; Kiran Mainali; Kelly Jackson; Hannah Starke; Utpal Bhalala
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  Non-invasive electrical cardiometry cardiac output monitoring during prehospital helicopter emergency medical care: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Cornelis Slagt; Sjoerd Servaas; Rein Ketelaars; Geert-Jan van Geffen; Marijn Cornelia Theresia Tacken; Corien Alexandra Verrips; Lonneke Ankie Marcel Baggen; Gert Jan Scheffer; Lucas Theodorus van Eijk
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.