Literature DB >> 18174074

Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers.

Frederick A Booth1, Justin M Edelman, William R Proffit.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many orthodontists believe permanent retention is the only way to maintain ideal tooth alignment after treatment. Fixed bonded retainers are now routinely left in place for many years, even decades. The purpose of this study was to examine the health effects and effectiveness of very long-term retention.
METHODS: Sixty patients who had had bonded canine-to-canine retainers placed a minimum of 20 years previously were recalled.
RESULTS: Forty-five still had the retainers still in place, and, of these, only 1 had an irregularity index score >2 mm. In this group, the retainers of 28 patients had never broken, and the retainers were repaired once for 8 patients and more than once for 9. The other 15 patients had had their retainers removed outside the orthodontic practice 5 to 25 years previously. In 13 of these patients, the irregularity index score was >3 mm, and 5 of them had scores >4 mm. Gingival index scores for all teeth from first molar to first molar in both arches demonstrated no detrimental effects to the mandibular anterior gingiva from leaving these retainers in place, and the mean score for the maxillary incisor area was better in the patients with a retained mandibular retainer, suggesting better hygiene in the group with retainers.
CONCLUSION: Long-term retention of mandibular incisor alignment is acceptable to most patients and quite compatible with periodontal health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174074     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  30 in total

1.  Factors influencing fixed retention practices in German-speaking Switzerland: A survey.

Authors:  Sina N Arnold; Nikolaos Pandis; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Survival of post-treatment canine-to-canine lingual retainers with fiber-reinforced composite resin: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Roberto Briguglio; Francesco Mangano; Lorenzo Azzi; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Francesco Briguglio
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Myths and realities in orthodontics.

Authors:  P S Fleming; S D Springate; R A C Chate
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.

Authors:  M Wolf; P Schumacher; F Jäger; J Wego; U Fritz; H Korbmacher-Steiner; A Jäger; M Schauseil
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  How standard deviation contributes to the validity of a LDF signal: a cohort study of 8 years of dental trauma.

Authors:  Herman J J Roeykens; Peter De Coster; Wolfgang Jacquet; Roeland J G De Moor
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Correlation between parodontal indexes and orthodontic retainers: prospective study in a group of 16 patients.

Authors:  D DI Venere; F Pettini; G M Nardi; A Laforgia; G Stefanachi; V Notaro; B Rapone; F R Grassi; M Corsalini
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10

7.  A discerning approach to simple aesthetic orthodontics.

Authors:  J H Noar; S Sharma; D Roberts-Harry; T Qureshi
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Lower fixed retainers: bonded on all teeth or only on canines? A systematic review.

Authors:  Larissa Barbosa Moda; Ana Luiza Correa da Silva Barros; Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes; David Normando; Lucianne Cople Maia; Sissy Maria Dos Anjos Mendes
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Long-term effects of Class II orthodontic treatment on oral health.

Authors:  N C Bock; M Saffar; H Hudel; M Evälahti; K Heikinheimo; D P C Rice; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Post-treatment changes in permanent retention.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; U Schulte; K Küpper; C Bourauel; L Keilig; S N Papageorgiou; C Dirk; C Kirschneck; N Daratsianos; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.