Sarah J Catchlove1, Todd B Parrish2, Yufen Chen2, Helen Macpherson3, Matthew E Hughes4,5, Andrew Pipingas1. 1. Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia. 2. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. 4. Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia. 5. Australian National Imaging Facility, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) reflects the response of brain blood vessels to vasoactive stimuli, such as neural activity. The current research assessed age-related changes in regional CVR to 5% CO2 inhalation in younger (n = 30, range: 21-45 years) and older (n = 29, range: 55-75 years) adults, and the contribution of regional CVR to cognitive performance using blood-oxygen-level dependent contrast imaging (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3T field strength. CVR was measured by inducing hypercapnia using a block-design paradigm under physiological monitoring. Memory and attention were assessed with a comprehensive computerized aging battery. MRI data analysis was conducted using MATLAB® and SPM12. Memory and attention performance was positively associated with CVR in the temporal cortices. Temporal lobe CVR influenced memory performance independently of age, gender, and education level. When analyzing age groups separately, CVR in the hippocampus contributed significantly to memory score in the older group and was also related to subjective memory complaints. No associations between CVR and cognition were observed in younger adults. Vascular responsiveness in the brain has consequences for cognition in cognitively healthy people. These findings may inform other areas of research concerned with vaso-protective approaches for prevention or treatment of neurocognitive decline.
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) reflects the response of brain blood vessels to vasoactive stimuli, such as neural activity. The current research assessed age-related changes in regional CVR to 5% CO2 inhalation in younger (n = 30, range: 21-45 years) and older (n = 29, range: 55-75 years) adults, and the contribution of regional CVR to cognitive performance using blood-oxygen-level dependent contrast imaging (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3T field strength. CVR was measured by inducing hypercapnia using a block-design paradigm under physiological monitoring. Memory and attention were assessed with a comprehensive computerized aging battery. MRI data analysis was conducted using MATLAB® and SPM12. Memory and attention performance was positively associated with CVR in the temporal cortices. Temporal lobe CVR influenced memory performance independently of age, gender, and education level. When analyzing age groups separately, CVR in the hippocampus contributed significantly to memory score in the older group and was also related to subjective memory complaints. No associations between CVR and cognition were observed in younger adults. Vascular responsiveness in the brain has consequences for cognition in cognitively healthy people. These findings may inform other areas of research concerned with vaso-protective approaches for prevention or treatment of neurocognitive decline.
Maintaining good cognitive health is of critical importance in a time where there are
increasing numbers of older individuals. Aging is associated with alterations in the
structure and function of the brain and the vascular system that supports it. There
is growing evidence that age-related declines in cardiovascular and neurocognitive
function are intrinsically linked.[1-4] Arterial health has emerged as a
significant predictor of cognitive performance, and both arterial health and
cognitive performance have been shown to decline with increasing age, an indication
that there is an age-dependent association between the two.[5] Cerebral blood flow (CBF) decreases with advancing age,[6] and this reduction is associated with cognitive decline.[7] Peripheral arterial stiffness has been shown to predict cognitive performance
in a group of healthy middle-aged adults.[8] The connection between brain and vascular health is undoubtedly significant;
however, the intrinsic nature of this connection is unclear.Blood-oxygen-level dependent contrast imaging (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance
imaging (fMRI) studies of cognitive aging have provided an abundance of information
about the brain. Normal physiological aging in the absence of pathology is linked
with various alterations in the vasculature of the brain, both functionally and structurally.[9] Endothelium-dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a main regulatory
mechanism that controls CBR.[10,11] CVR refers to a vasodilatory or vasoconstrictor response of the
blood vessels to a stimulus, and this measure provides a direct assessment of
vascular brain health.[12] Impaired CVR indicates microvascular hemodynamic dysfunction, which is
implicated in many brain disorders, including stroke[13] and Alzheimer’s disease (AD),[14-16] as well as mild cognitive impairment.[17]The CVR index reflects the response of cerebral blood vessels to extrinsic
stimulation by vasodilators such as acetazolamide[18,19] or hypercapnic
challenge.[20,21] Hypercapnia can be induced through inhalation of
CO2-enriched gas, which is a harmless way to investigate the effects of
vascular functioning on the blood flow parameters in the brain.[22-27] Vasodilation in response to
CO2 enhances CBR through diameter enlargement in the small
arterioles, making it possible to evaluate the function of small intra-cerebral
vasomotor vessels.[28]
Age differences in CVR
Increasing evidence shows that the cerebral vessel contractility and dilation
becomes diminished in later life, consequently impacting neurovascular coupling.[29] Multiple biochemical elements have been suggested as responsible for this
loss of function, including reduced production and release of vasodilatory
substances such as nitric oxide (NO), and increasing production of
vasoconstrictive factors by the cerebral endothelium.[9] The vascular wall is also affected structurally in the normal aging
process; thickening of the basement membrane by augmented collagen and losses of
smooth muscle and elastin occurs frequently.[30] Atherosclerosis is also common, even in healthy aging, and further
reduces the capacity for control of vascular diameter and tone. These
alterations lead to the progressive stiffening of the cerebral blood vessels,
resulting in a reduced capacity for dynamic control of blood flow in response to
neural demand.[31,32] These differences in vascular responsiveness between
younger and older adults have implications for the interpretation of BOLD fMRI
data in aging research.[33]Age-related differences in CVR have been studied widely, though evidence is
mixed. While most reports indicate that blood vessel reactivity in the brain
decreases with age,[32,34-39] other studies have found
that vasomotor reactivity increases,[40] or remains the same across the lifespan.[41,42]Discrepancies between the type of vasodilatory stimuli, brain regions studied,
age ranges, methodologies, and data analysis cloud the interpretation of studies
of CVR in aging. While it is likely that vasomotor responsiveness in the brain
diminishes due to the known physiological changes that occur in the vasculature
with age, age-related alterations in CVR remain to be elucidated.
Regional differences in CVR
Reactivity in the brain is temporally dynamic, differs between vascular
territories, and is heterogeneous across regions,[43,44] though the findings are
inconsistent. Research has shown that regional CVR is higher in the parietal and
occipital areas when compared to frontal, temporal and insula cortices[43] yet others have found the greatest reactivity in the cerebellum and
visual cortex, with the least in the frontal lobes.[45] Grey matter has up to three times greater reactivity than white
matter.[21,23] Furthermore, the effects of normal aging on regional CVR
remain inconclusive, and the question of whether some areas are more affected
than others remains. The known heterogeneity of age-related changes in regional CBF[12] would indicate that CVR also varies between brain regions, and that
vascular responsiveness may alter over time differently in differing areas.One study[15] reported that the posterior regions of the brain were more predominantly
dysfunctional than other areas in a study of ADpatients versus healthy
controls, and CVR in these areas was correlated with cognitive performance,
suggesting that the relationship between reactivity and cognitive impairment may
be region-dependent. Evidently further research is necessary to clarify the
regional distribution of vasoreactivity changes in the aging brain, as regions
with a lower vasodilatory capacity could be more affected by reduced perfusion
than areas that have greater reactivity, potentially contributing to cognitive
losses in the elderly.[46]
Cognition and CVR
Given the predictive relationship of vascular health and cognitive
performance,[47,48] CVR has been examined for its relationship to cognition.
Changes to the integrity of the cerebrovascular system can bring about cognitive
change due to dysfunctional neurovascular coupling.[43] Vascular disorders have been shown to contribute to neurodegenerative and
cognitive illnesses.[2,4,49,50] Associations between impaired CVR and severity of dementia
have been established.[51,52] CVR assessed by the breath-holding index (BHI) was found to
be the best predictor of cognitive performance in AD over and above gender, age,
education, and vascular risk factors,[51] and pathological BHI is also predictive of conversion from MCI to AD.[53] One study in cognitively healthy patients with peripheral artery disease
reported that CVR was linked to executive function, memory, global cognition,
and attention scores.[54] While the vessel reactivity-cognition link has often been investigated in
cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, particularly AD, the association
between cerebrovascular function and cognition in healthy aging is yet to be
clarified. If impaired vascular reactivity is found to be implicated in
cognitive performance, vaso-protective therapies may be a target for prevention
of age-related cognitive decline.The goal of the present study was to further this research by using MRI to
measure the BOLD signal during CO2 inhalation in healthy, normally
aging adults to assess differences in CVR across the lifespan. A cognitive
assessment was performed to ascertain the relationships between cognition and
cerebrovascular function in healthy aging. Second, it was of interest to
investigate whether reactivity was the same across different brain regions, that
is, was the age-related change in CVR heterogeneous throughout the brain, or are
some regions more affected than others. Additionally, the relationships of
regional CVR to cognitive performance on measures of memory and attention were
examined to explore whether these cognitive domains are differentially affected
by CVR in distinct brain regions.Based on previous research, it was expected that CVR values would vary across
regions and CVR would decline with age.[7,21,45] Also expected was a
positive association between CVR and cognition, such that greater reactivity
would be correlated with better performance.[15,54]
Results
Characteristics of sample are shown in Table 1 below. The younger group was
significantly more educated, with lower body mass index (BMI) and larger grey matter
volumes than the older group. Reaction times on the memory and attention tasks were
significantly faster in the younger group.
Table 1.
Means, standard deviations for characteristics of the study population.
Whole sampleAge range 21-75 (M: 47.22,
SD: 18.59)n = 59
YoungerAge range 21-44(M: 30.03,
SD: 6.22)n = 30
OlderAge range 55-75(M: 65, SD:
5.57)n = 29
Years of education
17.18 (3.69)*
18.37 (3.22)
15.81 (3.77)
TICS-m
29.36 (2.40)
MAC-Q
23.83 (3.57)
BMI
23.98 (4.03)*
22.61 (3.21)
25.45 (4.35)
Heart rate
66.98 (9.87)
67.46 (9.63)
66.50 (10.26)
Systolic pressure, mmHg
127.11 (16.31)
124.11 (16.32)
129.90 (16.09)
Diastolic pressure, mmHg
75.82 (10.76)
73.56 (10.69)
77.93 (10.57)
gmCBF, mL/100 g/min
45.04 (9.05)
45.54 (9.01)
44.52 (9.21)
GMV, cm3
703.99 (85.42) **
753.44 (73.77)
652.83 (64.40)
WMV, cm3
481.68 (56.46)
487.34 (60.66)
475.83 (52.18)
Baseline etCO2, mmHg
38.27 (4.55)
39.06 (4.18)
37.42 (4.85)
Hypercapnia etCO2, mmHg
46.09 (4.33)
46.88 (4.03)
45.24 (4.55)
ΔetCO2, mmHg
7.82 (2.26)
7.81 (2.32)
7.82 (2.26)
Memory mean RT, ms
908.19 (113.16) **
839.05 (87.08)
982.10 (88.92)
Attention mean RT, ms
529.65 (84.30)**
472.78 (62.32)
586.51 (62.31)
TICS-m: modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status; MAC-Q: Memory
Complaint Questionnaire; BMI: body mass index; gmCBF: grey matter
cerebral blood flow; GMV: grey matter volume; WMV: white matter volume;
etCO2: end-tidal CO2.
Values displayed are M (SD).
P < .01, **P < .001, significant
differences between younger and older groups.
Means, standard deviations for characteristics of the study population.TICS-m: modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status; MAC-Q: Memory
Complaint Questionnaire; BMI: body mass index; gmCBF: grey matter
cerebral blood flow; GMV: grey matter volume; WMV: white matter volume;
etCO2: end-tidal CO2.Values displayed are M (SD).P < .01, **P < .001, significant
differences between younger and older groups.
CVR is reduced in some regions with age
When using age as a continuous variable, CVR in the temporal lobe was found to
significantly decrease with age (r = -0.43,
P = .002). An independent t-test revealed that CVR in the
temporal lobes was higher in the younger compared to the older group, F(1,
50) = 2.58, P = .006. No other regions-of-interest (ROIs) showed significant
change with age in the sample as a whole.After separating the cohort into age groups, it was observed that CVR was
significantly reduced in the cingulum (r = −0.54,
P = .008), grey matter (r = −0.54,
P = .006) and temporal (r = −0.52,
P = .006) areas in the older group. The grey matter and
temporal areas still showed a marginally significant reduction after correction
for multiple comparisons. A graphical representation of the percentage change in
BOLD signal in the temporal lobes plotted with the change in etCO2 is
shown in Figure 1,
separated by age group. CVR did not change significantly with age in any of the
ROI in the younger group. Figure 2 shows the mean regional CVR values for each group. There
were no significant differences between genders in CVR in any region studied
across the lifespan, nor when separated into age groups.
Figure 1.
Percentage change in etCO.
Each marker on the x-axis represents 3 seconds (1 TR). BOLD traces have
been shifted to the right-young by 9 seconds (3 TR), and older by
18 seconds (6 TR), which yielded the maximum cross-correlation between
etCO2 and BOLD signals for this ROI. Lines representing
younger and older adults are displayed in different colors. Shaded area
indicates the hypercapnia period. The etCO2 data points
extracted for CVR analysis are indicated by the black lines below the
x-axis. To calculate CVR, BOLD data points were extracted and averaged
across a 30 second period during hypercapnia and final 30 seconds of the
baseline period preceding gas-inhalation separately by group
(66-96 seconds after the CO2-inhalation began in the younger
group and 72-102 seconds in the older group). After aligning the signals
at the maximum cross-correlation, the time from the gas-inhalation onset
to 50% of the maximum BOLD signal change was calculated for each group
for the temporal lobe ROI, younger 47 seconds, and older 51 seconds,
though an independent-samples t-test showed that these differences were
not significant (P = .52).
Figure 2.
Regional CVR values for younger and older adults. Mean cerebrovascular
reactivity values for ROIs averaged across groups.
GM grey matter.
All ROIS were bilateral, masked with a grey matter mask with a 50%
probability threshold.
**P < .01.
Percentage change in etCO.
Each marker on the x-axis represents 3 seconds (1 TR). BOLD traces have
been shifted to the right-young by 9 seconds (3 TR), and older by
18 seconds (6 TR), which yielded the maximum cross-correlation between
etCO2 and BOLD signals for this ROI. Lines representing
younger and older adults are displayed in different colors. Shaded area
indicates the hypercapnia period. The etCO2 data points
extracted for CVR analysis are indicated by the black lines below the
x-axis. To calculate CVR, BOLD data points were extracted and averaged
across a 30 second period during hypercapnia and final 30 seconds of the
baseline period preceding gas-inhalation separately by group
(66-96 seconds after the CO2-inhalation began in the younger
group and 72-102 seconds in the older group). After aligning the signals
at the maximum cross-correlation, the time from the gas-inhalation onset
to 50% of the maximum BOLD signal change was calculated for each group
for the temporal lobe ROI, younger 47 seconds, and older 51 seconds,
though an independent-samples t-test showed that these differences were
not significant (P = .52).Regional CVR values for younger and older adults. Mean cerebrovascular
reactivity values for ROIs averaged across groups.GM grey matter.All ROIS were bilateral, masked with a grey matter mask with a 50%
probability threshold.**P < .01.
Temporal lobe CVR predicts cognition across the lifespan
In the sample as a whole, correlations between cognitive variables and CVR were
observed. CVR in the temporal lobes was associated with both memory
(r = −0.46, P = .001) and attention
performance (r = −0.41, P = .003). Table 2 displays
results of separate unadjusted linear regressions for temporal lobe CVR and
cognitive score. Greater CVR was associated with faster reaction times. Linear
regression analyses showed that CVR in the temporal lobes significantly
predicted memory score, and this effect was independent of age, gender and years
of education. Figure 3
shows the relationship between temporal lobe CVR and memory task reaction times.
A second linear regression showed that attention was not significantly predicted
by temporal lobe CVR when adjusted for age, gender and education, though the
model itself was significant. Table 3 shows the results of separate
adjusted linear regression analyses.
Table 2.
Showing results of separate unadjusted linear regressions for temporal
lobe CVR contribution to memory and attention scores for the entire
sample.
Memory
Attention
B
SE B
β
B
SE B
β
−979.62
268.93
−0.46
−647.14
207.45
−0.31
R2
0.21
0.17
F
13.27***
9.73**
P < .01, ***P < .001.
Figure 3.
Scatterplot showing the relationship between CVR in the temporal
lobes and memory reaction times for the entire sample. Data
for younger and older groups are shown in different colors. Black line
indicates trend for whole sample data. An adjusted linear regression
analysis showed the temporal lobe CVR predicted memory score independent
of age, gender and education (P < .01).
Table 3.
Showing results of adjusted linear regression for temporal lobe CVR
contribution to memory and attention score for the entire sample.
Memory
Attention
B
SE B
β
B
SE B
β
Age
3.14
0.76
−0.51***
3.02
0.56
−0.67***
Gender
−46.07
25.12
−0.20
−6.31
18.74
−0.04
Education (years)
1.17
3.50
0.04
5.61
2.61
0.24*
Temporal lobe CVR
−626.24
265.20
−0.29**
−331.54
−196.87
−0.20
R2
0.52
0.54
F
11.75***
12.16***
P < .05, **P < .01,
***P < .001.
Showing results of separate unadjusted linear regressions for temporal
lobe CVR contribution to memory and attention scores for the entire
sample.P < .01, ***P < .001.Scatterplot showing the relationship between CVR in the temporal
lobes and memory reaction times for the entire sample. Data
for younger and older groups are shown in different colors. Black line
indicates trend for whole sample data. An adjusted linear regression
analysis showed the temporal lobe CVR predicted memory score independent
of age, gender and education (P < .01).Showing results of adjusted linear regression for temporal lobe CVR
contribution to memory and attention score for the entire sample.P < .05, **P < .01,
***P < .001.
Hippocampal CVR predicts memory score in older adults
When separated by age group, separate linear regressions showed that in the
younger sample there were no significant associations between CVR in any brain
region and either cognitive measure. In the older group however, CVR in the
hippocampus significantly predicted memory score, F(1, 20) = 5.83,
P = .026, with an R2 of .24.
CVR in the hippocampus was negatively associated with memory score such that
worse CVR reflected longer response times (ie, slower processing). Attention was
not associated with CVR in any brain region in either age group.Scores on the MAC-Q were significantly correlated with hippocampal CVR
(r = −0.439, P = .046), lower CVR was
associated with greater subjective memory complaints in the older group.
Additionally, there was a marginally significant correlation between hippocampal
CVR and TICS-m score in the older group (r = 0.46,
P = .056), suggesting a trend toward a relationship between
global cognitive impairment and regional reactivity in elderly individuals.
Summary of findings
As a whole, (1) CVR declined with age in the temporal lobes across the lifespan,
(2) CVR in the temporal lobes was associated with memory and attention scores,
and (3) when adjusted for age, gender and education, temporal lobe CVR predicted
memory score across the entire sample.When the sample was split into age groups, (1) there were significant declines in
CVR in several regions with age in the older group, but these declines were not
seen in the younger group; (2) there was a significant association between CVR
in the hippocampus and memory score in the older sample, but memory was not
related to CVR in any region in the younger group; (3) CVR was not associated
with attention score in either group; and (4) lower CVR was associated with
greater subjective memory concerns and global cognitive impairment in the older
group.
Discussion
The present study investigated age-related differences in regional CVR to carbon
dioxide in healthy younger and older adults, and the relationships between regional
CVR and cognitive performance. It was expected that an age-related CVR decline would
be observed between the younger and older groups, and that this decline would vary
between brain regions.[55] Also expected was a positive association between CVR and cognition, such that
greater reactivity would be correlated with better performance.[15,54] Temporal lobe
CVR predicted memory score independent of age, gender, and education across the
entire sample. Hippocampal CVR significantly predicted memory score in the older
group and was negatively associated with subjective memory complaints. Consistent
with literature, both measures of cognition declined with increasing age. This is
the first study to examine the differences in regional CVR between younger and older
cognitively healthy individuals in relation to performance on memory and attention
tasks. Findings demonstrate that reactivity is linked to cognition in both
regionally and task-specific ways in older healthy adults.
Age and regional differences in CVR
While CVR was lower in the older group in several regions studied, these declines
were not significant in all areas. The temporal lobes showed significant
reductions in reactivity between the younger and older groups. Reactivity
declined significantly in the cortical grey matter, the cingulum and the
temporal lobes in older adults with age, but no age effects were seen in the
younger adults. These findings are in line with previous research that reported
heterogeneous declines from younger to older age.[12]Mechanisms underlying the decreasing reactivity of cerebral vessels with age can
be explained by well-described age-associated vascular stiffening.[29] The more distensible, elastic properties of blood vessel walls are known
to deteriorate, and regenerate more slowly in aged individuals, while the more
rigid wall components, such as collagen and the basement membrane, may be augmented.[43] This results in the vessel wall becoming stiffer with time, even in the
absence of pathology. Arteriosclerosis can also be prevalent to some degree even
in healthy aging, adding to the rigidity of vessels.[9] A third insult that occurs with aging is the over-production or release
of vasoconstrictive substances such as endothelin-1, and the diminished release
of vasodilatory chemicals such as NO.[30] Underproduction of vasodilators by the endothelium will result in reduced
capacity for dilation or possibly even hyper-constriction, observed as impaired
responsiveness. Most MRI-based reports of regional CVR decline suggest that
diminishing vasomotor responses are widespread and generally will encompass most
areas of the brain, and that the decline in CVR is more abundant and pervasive
both spatially and in percentage than the decline in CBF.[32]CVR was heterogeneous across brain regions. Reactivity was higher in the
parietal, temporal, and frontal areas, and lowest in the hippocampus and
cingulate. This is corroborated by previous research indicating that CVR is
greater in the cortical grey matter when compared to the deeper grey matter structures.[43] Studies investigating the spatial distribution of small vessel reactivity
have observed widely varying values between areas, variation even between
vascular territories supplied by the same major arteries has been observed.[35] Variability between regions is likely due to differences in vascular
structure and density, and occurs due to the spatial inhomogeneity and
temporally dynamic nature of blood flow, in addition to differing neural and
metabolic demands in different parts of the brain.[44] ROIs assessed in the current work were intersected with grey matter
masks, which we expected would reduce any atrophy-related variability between
younger and older adults, thus providing a relative measurement of reactivity
not confounded by age-related volume differences.
CVR in the temporal lobes was associated with both memory and
attention
To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the contribution of CVR in
specific brain regions to attention and memory in cognitively healthy adults
with ages ranging across the adult lifespan. It was observed that better
vascular reactivity in the temporal lobes was associated with faster reaction
times on both memory and attention tasks. These associations were region-, task-
and age-dependent. When the effects of age, gender and education were controlled
for, the relationship between temporal CVR and memory remained significant.
These findings are corroborated by research aligning vascular reactivity with
cognitive scores in patient groups of AD,[15,51] vascular dementia,[56] and mild cognitive impairment.[53] Elucidating the patterns of change in reactivity that occur with
cognitive change is important; one study observed that there was a 33% chance of
conversion from MCI to AD within a year for those MCI patients who had
pathologically low CVR.[53]
CVR in the hippocampus significantly predicted memory score in older
adults
Additionally, we aimed to assess differences between younger and older
individuals, and found that when comparing the groups, there were significantly
different relationships in regional CVR effects on cognition. Vascular
reactivity in the bilateral hippocampus was linked to memory performance in the
older group, yet this relationship was not observed in younger adults. Previous
research found that vasoreactivity in the hippocampus is reduced in cognitively
impaired individuals compared to healthy controls[57]; however, this is the first study to show a direct correlation between
memory function and hippocampal CVR in cognitively healthy individuals. Much
evidence has shown the association of hippocampal volume[58] and perfusion[59,60] to various memory functions, though the impact of integrity
of the small vessels supplying this structure are less well understood. This
novel finding highlights the contribution of vascular integrity to a distinct
cognitive domain both regionally and functionally. This result is not
surprising, given the evidence showing that impaired vessel function can lead to
changes in perfusion, possibly culminating in damage to brain regions that are
strategic for memory functions.[43] The hippocampus is particularly vulnerable to damage from ischemia and is
notably damaged by AD pathology. Dysfunctional reactivity reduces perfusion,
potentially resulting in greater cognitive losses in those at risk.Another notable finding is the significant relationship between subjective memory
complaints and hippocampal CVR. Greater reactivity was associated with less
memory concerns. Previous research has linked smaller hippocampal volume to
subjective memory problems in cognitively healthy people,[61] yet this is the first study to examine this relationship with CVR.
Subjective memory concerns may precede dementia and those with subjective
complaints are more likely to experience cognitive decline.[62,63] Our
findings suggest that vascular regional changes may be a part of the early
pathological process and serve as a first step in disentangling the relationship
between memory deficits and brain atrophy findings.Highly responsive blood vessels are essential for optimum flow-metabolism
coupling. Impaired CVR is an indication of underlying microvascular dysfunction
wherein the metabolically active regions of the brain will not be supplied
adequately to meet demands. This hypoperfusion can lead to chronic ischemia over
time, potentially preceding neurological and cognitive impairments.[64] Indeed, research has shown strong evidence of vascular origins in the
development and progression of AD.[4,49,65]
Limitations
The results of this study should be viewed in light of some limitations. Common
to all neuroscientific aging research, brain atrophy can present some issues
with comparability between age groups. In the present study, CVR values were
calculated such that they are absolute measures; however, care was taken to
ensure that all ROIs from which the data were extracted were masked with the
grey matter probability map to account for individual differences in partial
volume and tissue atrophy. This validated procedure has been utilized previously.[7]Additionally, it should be noted that inhalation of CO2-enriched gas
does not provide a precise standard arterial partial pressure of CO2
(PaCO2) stimulus, due to variability in individual respiratory responses.[66] While more exact methods of increasing PaCO2 exist (eg,
computer-controlled targeting of end-tidal CO2 partial pressures),
these are expensive and require specific equipment and are thus not as
accessible. A recent review of MRI-based CVR studies by the authors[67] found that inhalation of a fixed concentration of CO2-enriched
gas was the most commonly used vasoactive stimuli.The regional CVR values were calculated from the difference in etCO2
signal from the first 30 seconds of room air breathing to the last 30 seconds of
CO2 inhalation, while the BOLD values were calculated on the
basis of age group. BOLD signal traces were shifted backward to account for the
hemodynamic lag, in order to align the expired gas signal with the increase in
BOLD signal. It was found that the younger group had slightly shorter
hemodynamic lag than the older group (9 seconds versus 18 seconds), thus the
data points sampled for the CVR calculation were different based on age group.
While this shifting is valid and has been used in previous research,[7] various other sampling methods are available. Future studies may benefit
from analyzing CVR using other sampled time-points, for example, averaging the
data points from the 30 seconds preceding the maximum BOLD signal value reached
post-CO2 inhalation. This would ensure that the maximum signal
change is captured for estimating CVR.
Conclusions
In this study, we examined the differences in regional CVR between older and younger
healthy adults and investigated the associations of regional CVR to cognitive
performance. The current data highlight the association between brain vascular
reactivity and cognitive function; better performance was associated with greater
blood vessel responsiveness, particularly in regions directly associated with memory
function. The identification of cerebrovascular impairment in aging could help to
distinguish those who would benefit from vascular-specific therapeutic approaches,
and could potentially lead to detection of early dysfunction of the vascular system
in people at risk. These findings could inform other areas of research for
implications of vascular stiffening in the brain, and provide impetus for
vascular-specific therapeutic targets to help maintain cognitive functions over the
lifespan.
Experimental Procedure
Participants
In all, 30 younger (aged 21–44, mean age 30 years, SD: 6.22 years, 12 females)
and 29 older (aged 55-75, mean age 65 years, SD 5.57 years, 18 females) healthy
(ie, active, independently-living, asymptomatic) adults were recruited from the
community. Participants underwent telephone screening and had no
contraindications for MRI scanning (no pacemaker, metallic implants, or
claustrophobia). Participants were of generally good health, with no
self-reported history of neurological, psychiatric, cardiovascular or
inflammatory diseases, and not suffering from asthma or other respiratory
problems. The Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status- (TICS-m[68]) was used to screen for mild cognitive impairment and dementia for
participants aged over 45 years. Participants scoring 23 or below were omitted
from the final analysis (n = 3). The Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q)[69] was used to quantify subjective memory complaints in the older
participants. After receiving an explanation of the study procedure,
participants provided written informed consent. The research protocol was
approved by both the Swinburne University Human Research Ethics Committee and
the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, and was conducted in
accordance with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
Regional CVR was measured in a total of 54 participants; some data were lost due
to motion in the scanner. Table 1 lists the demographic information for the participants.
Experimental design and procedure
Data were acquired in one testing session of approximately 3 hours’ duration.
Participant’s blood pressure was taken before and after an initial 5-minute
gas-breathing procedure conducted outside the scanner. A registered nurse was
present for this familiarization in which each subjects’ SpO2 was
constantly monitored. Participants then underwent magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) scanning during which they inhaled CO2 twice over a period of
10 minutes (see Figure
4). After MRI scanning, participants underwent a 30-minute computerized
cognitive assessment.
Figure 4.
Experimental design of the hypercapnia scans. 5%
CO2 inhalation was used to induce hypercapnia. Blue line
indicates the period where baseline etCO2 data were
collected, orange line indicates the period where hypercapnia
etCO2 data was collected. The BOLD data points were
extracted from the average point of maximum signal change across all
ROIs to the 30 seconds preceding. This equated to the sampled BOLD data
points during the hypercapnia period being selected from 66 to
96 seconds after CO2 switched on in the younger group, and
72-102 seconds after CO2 switched on in the older group.
Experimental design of the hypercapnia scans. 5%
CO2 inhalation was used to induce hypercapnia. Blue line
indicates the period where baseline etCO2 data were
collected, orange line indicates the period where hypercapniaetCO2 data was collected. The BOLD data points were
extracted from the average point of maximum signal change across all
ROIs to the 30 seconds preceding. This equated to the sampled BOLD data
points during the hypercapnia period being selected from 66 to
96 seconds after CO2 switched on in the younger group, and
72-102 seconds after CO2 switched on in the older group.
MRI data acquisition
Data were collected using a 3T Siemens Tim Trio MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany) fitted with a 32 channel head coil at Swinburne University of
Technology (Hawthorn, Australia). Participants were requested to minimize head
movements, and foam padding was inserted around the head to aid this.Data from two hypercapnia scans were sampled and averaged for analysis.
Hypercapnia was induced by inhalation of gas mixture containing 5%
CO2, 21% O2, and 74% N2 that was delivered
from a 100 L non-diffusing Douglas bag through a mouth-piece with nose-clip to
ensure mouth-only breathing. A two-way valve allowed the researcher to manually
switch between CO2-enriched gas and room air for the 2 x 5-minute
scans, as instructed by a visual signal from the MR operator. Gas delivery was
alternated: 1 min room air, 2 min CO2, and 2 min room air. The
breathing apparatus is shown in Figure 5. An MRI-safe patient monitor (Medrad Veris system, Bayer
HealthCare AG, Leverkusen, Germany) continuously recorded a digital output of
participants’ vital signs (heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory
rate), as well as end-tidal CO2 (etCO2).
Figure 5.
Breathing apparatus (a) 100 L Douglas bag, (b) 3-way valve, (c) 2-way
non-rebreathing valve, (d) nose-clip, (e) filter (gas-sampling tube
attaches here, not shown), and (f) mouth-piece.
Breathing apparatus (a) 100 L Douglas bag, (b) 3-way valve, (c) 2-way
non-rebreathing valve, (d) nose-clip, (e) filter (gas-sampling tube
attaches here, not shown), and (f) mouth-piece.In all, 14 axial slices with in-plane resolution of 3.44 x 3.44 x 5 mm, 2.5 mm
apart were acquired oblique to the commissural plane (shown in Figure 6A and B). Hypercapnia scans were
acquired using PASL with a PICORE/Q2TIPS tagging sequence, in accordance with
similar research on vasoreactivity.[70-72] Gradient-echo echoplanar
(EPI) readout, TI1 = 700 ms, TI2 = 1500 ms, tag-size = 20 cm, TR = 3000 ms,
TE = 13 ms, flip-angle = 90°. T1-weighted structural images were obtained using
a high resolution MPRAGE 3D anatomical scan (axial, TR = 2300 ms, TE = 2.52 ms,
voxel-size = 1 x 1 x 1 mm3, FOV = 256 mm, 176 slices).
Figure 6.
MRI slice positioning and brain regions of interest (ROIs) (A) sagittal
view, (B) coronal view, and (C) ROIs included the bilateral parietal,
occipital, frontal, temporal, insula, hippocampus and cingulum.
MRI slice positioning and brain regions of interest (ROIs) (A) sagittal
view, (B) coronal view, and (C) ROIs included the bilateral parietal,
occipital, frontal, temporal, insula, hippocampus and cingulum.
Data analysis
CVR data were processed using SPM12 (SPM12, University College of London, UK) and
associated toolboxes, in addition to in-house tools, all run on MATLAB 2014b
(The MathWorks). All data were motion-corrected, co-registered to individual
T1-weighted images, normalized to the stereotactic space defined by the Montreal
Neurologic Institute (MNI space), and then spatially smoothed with 8 mm FWHM
Gaussian filter. The data were separated into CBF and BOLD time-series using the
surround subtraction and averaging method[70] as per Chen and Parrish.[71] CVR based on BOLD were calculated. CBF-based CVR values are not reported
in this paper.Age-related changes in CVR were explored using ROI analysis. Seven ROIs were
chosen based on previous reports in the literature.[7,21] These regions were the
bilateral superior parietal, mid-occipital, frontal, mid-temporal, insula,
hippocampus and the cingulum (ROIs are shown in Figure 6C) and were applied to the data
to extract BOLD time-courses. Mean whole brain grey matter was also used as an
ROI. These regions were defined from the AAL package in WFU PickAtlas toolbox[73] for SPM12.Grey and white matter volumes were obtained using standard segmentation in VBM8
software from SPM12. Individual grey matter masks from the VBM analysis were
smoothed to the resolution of the BOLD time-series. To account for partial
volume and atrophy effects, the grey matter masks were set with a threshold of
.5 (>50% probability to be grey matter) and the intersection with each ROI
was used for final CVR analysis. CVR in the whole grey matter was also estimated
using the thresholded grey matter mask as the ROI for each individual. This
adjustment corrects for brain tissue volume differences. CBF in the grey matter
at baseline was calculated from the ASL scans, values shown in Table 1.
CVR calculation
The two hypercapnia blocks (Figure 1) were averaged for each subject prior to computing the
percentage change in BOLD relative to baseline for each ROI. Baseline
etCO2 data were calculated from the final 30 seconds of the room
air period at the beginning of each scan, and etCO2 for the
hypercapnia period was calculated from the final 30 seconds of each
CO2 inhalation block. Due to variable hemodynamic delays, each
subject’s BOLD signal for the hypercapnia period were extracted from the point
of average maximum signal change across all ROIS and the 30 seconds preceding,
which equated to time-points 66–96 seconds for younger and 72–102 seconds for
the older group, following the beginning of the CO2-inhalation
period. Baseline BOLD data were calculated from the final 30 seconds of the room
air period at the beginning of each scan. Data were sampled from different
points in order to obtain the maximum CVR change for each group across all ROIs.
Both BOLD and etCO2 data were temporally smoothed by a 5-point moving
average filter using the “smooth” function in MATLAB. CVR was calculated as the
%change in BOLD/ mmHg change in etCO2.To assess differences in hemodynamic delay between the age groups, the time to
50% of the maximum value from beginning of the CO2 mixture inhalation
was computed for each group and each ROI separately.
Cognitive assessment
Screening tool- Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status
(TICS-m)
The TICS-m is a reliable and validated brief 13-item test of cognitive
functioning that is administered over the telephone.[68] The items covered related to questions of orientation, repetition,
naming, calculations and immediate and delayed recall with scores ranging
from 0 to 35. Participants who scored 23 or below were omitted from the
final analysis (n = 3).
Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q)
The MAC-Q[69] is designed to quantify subjective memory complaints associated with
aging. It consists of six questions which ask the participant to compare
their current everyday memory to that of earlier life. Possible score range
is from 7 to 35. Greater scores indicate greater subjective memory
concerns.
Swinburne University Computerized Cognitive Aging Battery
(SUCCAB)
The SUCCAB is described previously in Pipingas et al.[74] Participants were given instructions on how to perform each task and
completed a practice task prior to performing the main task used for
analysis. Tasks were designed to test aspects of spatial and object memory,
executive processes, attention and processing speed using tasks similar to
those used in previous studies examining the effects of aging on
cognition.[74,75] Tasks were presented in the order of simple
reaction time, choice reaction time, immediate recognition, congruent
Stroop, incongruent Stroop, spatial working memory, contextual working
memory, delayed recognition. The SUCCAB took approximately 30 minutes to
complete. The method of composition has been described previously.[76] Response times for the immediate and delayed recognition, spatial
working memory and contextual memory tasks were averaged to give the memory
composite score. Simple and choice reaction time, and the two Stroop task
response times were averaged to give the attention composite score. Higher
scores reflected slower response time.
Statistical analyses
IBM SPSS statistics v.23 (Chicago, IL, USA) was used to conduct analysis.
Pearson’s correlations determined the association between age, CVR in various
brain regions and composite cognitive scores. Linear regressions were performed
to assess the contribution of CVR in different brain regions to the cognition
measures separately. Cognitive score was entered as the dependent variable, age,
gender, and years of education were entered as the independent variables in
model one, and CVR region entered in model 2. P values of .05
or less were considered statistically significant in all analyses; however, a
correction for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni’s correction) was applied to
investigate CVR differences between the age groups for the ROI analysis. The
level of significance was adjusted on eight ROIs (P ⩽
.00625).
Authors: Carissa J Murrell; James D Cotter; Kate N Thomas; Samuel J E Lucas; Michael J A Williams; Philip N Ainslie Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2012-06-06
Authors: Edoardo Vicenzini; Maria Chiara Ricciardi; Marta Altieri; Francesco Puccinelli; Novella Bonaffini; Vittorio Di Piero; Gian Luigi Lenzi Journal: Eur Neurol Date: 2007-06-12 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Alex A Bhogal; Jeroen C W Siero; Joseph A Fisher; Martijn Froeling; Peter Luijten; Marielle Philippens; Hans Hoogduin Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Richard G Wise; Kyle T S Pattinson; Daniel P Bulte; Peter A Chiarelli; Stephen D Mayhew; George M Balanos; David F O'Connor; Timothy R Pragnell; Peter A Robbins; Irene Tracey; Peter Jezzard Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Moss Y Zhao; Amanda Woodward; Audrey P Fan; Kevin T Chen; Yannan Yu; David Y Chen; Michael E Moseley; Greg Zaharchuk Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 6.960
Authors: J N Barnes; R E Harvey; N A Eisenmann; K B Miller; M C Johnson; S M Kruse; B D Lahr; M J Joyner; V M Miller Journal: Climacteric Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Sara G Aguilar-Navarro; Alberto José Mimenza-Alvarado; Isaac Corona-Sevilla; Gilberto A Jiménez-Castillo; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; José Alberto Ávila-Funes; Gustavo C Román Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2019-08-24
Authors: Donghoon Kim; Timothy M Hughes; Megan E Lipford; Suzanne Craft; Laura D Baker; Samuel N Lockhart; Christopher T Whitlow; Stephanie E Okonmah-Obazee; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Matthew Bobinski; Youngkyoo Jung Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Michael S Stringer; Gordon W Blair; Yulu Shi; Iona Hamilton; David A Dickie; Fergus N Doubal; Ian M Marshall; Michael J Thrippleton; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 4.755