Celeste A de Jager1, Marc M Budge, Robert Clarke. 1. Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing and University Department of Pharmacology, Oxford, UK. celest.de-jager@pharm.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routine screening of high-risk elderly people for early cognitive impairment is constrained by the limitations of currently available cognitive function tests. The Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status is a novel instrument for assessment of cognitive function that can be administered in person or by telephone. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the determinants and utility of TICS-M (13-item modified version) for assessment of cognitive function in healthy elderly people. METHODS: The utility of TICS-M was compared with more widely used MMSE and CAMCOG in a cross-sectional survey of 120 older (62 to 89 years) UK adults. RESULTS: The TICS-M cognitive test scores (27.97, SD 4.15) were normally distributed in contrast with those for MMSE and CAMCOG that had a negatively skewed distribution. TICS-M scores were inversely correlated with age (r = -0.21) and with the NART fullscale IQ (r = -0.35), but were independent of years of education in this cohort. TICS-M was highly correlated with MMSE (r = 0.57) and with CAMCOG (r = 0.62) scores. The time required to complete the test is comparable to MMSE and substantially less than CAMCOG. CONCLUSIONS: The normal distribution of TICS-M test scores suggest that this test is less constrained by the ceiling effect which limits the utility of MMSE and CAMCOG test scores in detecting early cognitive impairment. TICS-M is an appropriate instrument to assess cognitive function in both research and in clinical practice. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Routine screening of high-risk elderly people for early cognitive impairment is constrained by the limitations of currently available cognitive function tests. The Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status is a novel instrument for assessment of cognitive function that can be administered in person or by telephone. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the determinants and utility of TICS-M (13-item modified version) for assessment of cognitive function in healthy elderly people. METHODS: The utility of TICS-M was compared with more widely used MMSE and CAMCOG in a cross-sectional survey of 120 older (62 to 89 years) UK adults. RESULTS: The TICS-M cognitive test scores (27.97, SD 4.15) were normally distributed in contrast with those for MMSE and CAMCOG that had a negatively skewed distribution. TICS-M scores were inversely correlated with age (r = -0.21) and with the NART fullscale IQ (r = -0.35), but were independent of years of education in this cohort. TICS-M was highly correlated with MMSE (r = 0.57) and with CAMCOG (r = 0.62) scores. The time required to complete the test is comparable to MMSE and substantially less than CAMCOG. CONCLUSIONS: The normal distribution of TICS-M test scores suggest that this test is less constrained by the ceiling effect which limits the utility of MMSE and CAMCOG test scores in detecting early cognitive impairment. TICS-M is an appropriate instrument to assess cognitive function in both research and in clinical practice. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Averria Sirkin Martin; Barton W Palmer; David Rock; Camille V Gelston; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Brian J Kelly; Terry J Lewin; Helen J Stain; Clare Coleman; Michael Fitzgerald; David Perkins; Vaughan J Carr; Lyn Fragar; Jeffrey Fuller; David Lyle; John R Beard Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: David T Liebers; Mehdi Pirooznia; Fayaz Seiffudin; Katherine L Musliner; Peter P Zandi; Fernando S Goes Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Tanya R Gure; Ryan J McCammon; Christine T Cigolle; Todd M Koelling; Caroline S Blaum; Kenneth M Langa Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-05
Authors: Joshua Z Willey; Yeseon Park Moon; Rachel Ruder; Yuen K Cheung; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind; Clinton B Wright Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Lesley A Ross; Christina E Webb; Christine Whitaker; Jarrod M Hicks; Erica L Schmidt; Shaadee Samimy; Nancy A Dennis; Kristina M Visscher Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Dilip V Jeste; Gauri N Savla; Wesley K Thompson; Ipsit V Vahia; Danielle K Glorioso; A'verria Sirkin Martin; Barton W Palmer; David Rock; Shahrokh Golshan; Helena C Kraemer; Colin A Depp Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: D H Salat; D S Tuch; A J W van der Kouwe; D N Greve; V Pappu; S Y Lee; N D Hevelone; A K Zaleta; J H Growdon; S Corkin; B Fischl; H D Rosas Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.673