Literature DB >> 34806918

Reproducibility of cerebrovascular reactivity measurements: A systematic review of neuroimaging techniques.

Moss Y Zhao1, Amanda Woodward2, Audrey P Fan3,4, Kevin T Chen1, Yannan Yu1, David Y Chen5,6, Michael E Moseley1, Greg Zaharchuk1.   

Abstract

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), the capacity of the brain to increase cerebral blood flow (CBF) to meet changes in physiological demand, is an important biomarker to evaluate brain health. Typically, this brain "stress test" is performed by using a medical imaging modality to measure the CBF change between two states: at baseline and after vasodilation. However, since there are many imaging modalities and many ways to augment CBF, a wide range of CVR values have been reported. An understanding of CVR reproducibility is critical to determine the most reliable methods to measure CVR as a clinical biomarker. This review focuses on CVR reproducibility studies using neuroimaging techniques in 32 articles comprising 427 total subjects. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We identified 5 factors of the experimental subjects (such as sex, blood characteristics, and smoking) and 9 factors of the measuring technique (such as the imaging modality, the type of the vasodilator, and the quantification method) that have strong effects on CVR reproducibility. Based on this review, we recommend several best practices to improve the reproducibility of CVR quantification in neuroimaging studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrovascular reactivity; brain stress test; cerebrovascular reserve; repeatability; reproducibility; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34806918      PMCID: PMC9254040          DOI: 10.1177/0271678X211056702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.960


  76 in total

1.  MR assessment of cerebral vascular response: a comparison of two methods.

Authors:  Aart Spilt; Rivka Van den Boom; Adriaan M Kamper; Gerard J Blauw; Edward L E M Bollen; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements of cerebral autoregulation with a breath-hold challenge: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Michiel J de Boorder; Jeroen Hendrikse; Jeroen van der Grond
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Christian F Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and other disorders.

Authors:  Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Measuring vascular reactivity with resting-state blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations: A potential alternative to the breath-holding challenge?

Authors:  Hesamoddin Jahanian; Thomas Christen; Michael E Moseley; Nicholas M Pajewski; Clinton B Wright; Manjula K Tamura; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 6.  Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) MRI with CO2 challenge: A technical review.

Authors:  Peiying Liu; Jill B De Vis; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Caffeine and human cerebral blood flow: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  O G Cameron; J G Modell; M Hariharan
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  The effect of daily caffeine use on cerebral blood flow: How much caffeine can we tolerate?

Authors:  Merideth A Addicott; Lucie L Yang; Ann M Peiffer; Luke R Burnett; Jonathan H Burdette; Michael Y Chen; Satoru Hayasaka; Robert A Kraft; Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement in cerebral small vessel disease: Rationale and reproducibility of a protocol for MRI acquisition and image processing.

Authors:  Michael J Thrippleton; Yulu Shi; Gordon Blair; Iona Hamilton; Gordon Waiter; Christian Schwarzbauer; Cyril Pernet; Peter Jd Andrews; Ian Marshall; Fergus Doubal; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.266

10.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasound to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: reliability, reproducibility and effect of posture.

Authors:  Michelle N McDonnell; Narelle M Berry; Mark A Cutting; Hannah A Keage; Jonathan D Buckley; Peter R C Howe
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.